Abstract
Leibniz influenced the contemporary cosmologists Roger Penrose and Lee Smolin, an influence I trace at the beginning of this chapter, which examines debates over the nature of time in recent centuries. I look at the revision of the concept of time occasioned by 19th c. Thermodynamics, and then Boltzmann’s attempt to reconcile it with Newtonian mechanics: is the arrow of time (so referentially compelling) real, or can it be explained away by an analytic discourse? During the 20th century, in a sense classical General Relativity Theory continued the Newtonian tradition of an analytic, geometrical theory of time, and Quantum Mechanics continued the Leibnizian tradition of a referential theory of time elicited from the dynamical object (molecular, atomic, and subatomic particles); and the dialectic, modified, continues into the current century. I argue that the heterogeneity of the discourses and their complementarity are useful for the advance of science; and that the interesting philosophical question is how the two approaches interact.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ashtekar, A. (2012). Introduction to loop quantum gravity. In arXiv: 1201.4598v1 [gr-qc] 22 Jan. 2012: 1–30.
Ashtekar, A. (2015). Time in fundamental physics. In E. Grosholz (Ed.), Time and Cosmology, Special Issue of Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 52, 69–74.
Butterfield, J. (2015). Assessing the montevideo interpretation of quantum mechanics. In E. Grosholz (Ed.), Time and Cosmology, Special Issue of Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 52, 75–85.
Carroll, S. (2010). From eternity to here: The quest for the ultimate theory of time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cartwright, N. (1999). The dappled world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cercignani, C. (2006). Ludwig Bolzmann: The man who trusted atoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Gandt, F. (1995). Force and geometry in Newton’s Principia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Earman, J. (2002). What time reversal invariance is and why it matters. International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 16(3), 245–264.
Grosholz, E. (Ed.) (2015). Time and Cosmology, Special Issue of Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 52.
Horwich, P. (1987). Asymmetries in time: Problems in the philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jaeger, G. (2009). Entanglement, information, and the interpretation of quantum mechanics. New York: Springer.
Müller, I. (2007). A history of thermodynamics. New York: Springer.
Newton, I. (1934). In A. Motte (Tr.) & F. Cajori (Ed.), Mathematical principles of natural philosophy and his system of the world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ney, A., & Albert, D. (Eds.). (2013). The wave function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Penrose, R. (1979). Singularities and time-asymmetry. In W. Hawking & W. Israel (Eds.), General relativity: An Einstein centenary (pp. 581–638). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Penrose, R. (2004). The road to reality: A complete guide to the laws of the universe. New York: Knopf.
Penrose, R. (2011). Cycles of time: An extraordinary new view of the universe. New York: Vintage.
Sachs, R. G. (1987). The physics of time reversal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schlosshauer, M. (2008). Decoherence and the quantum-to-classical transition. New York: Springer.
Schweber, S. S. (1994). QED and the men who made it: Dyson, Feynman, Schwinger and Tomonaga. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Smolin, L. (2013). Time reborn. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Smolin, L. (2015). Temporal naturalism. In E. Grosholz (Ed.), Time and Cosmology, Special Issue of Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 52, 86–102.
Weinberg, S. (1977/1993). The first three minutes: A modern view of the origin of the universe. New York: Basic Books.
Zeh, H. D. (2007). The physical basis of the direction of time. New York: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grosholz, E.R. (2016). The Representation of Time from 1700 to the Present. In: Starry Reckoning: Reference and Analysis in Mathematics and Cosmology. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46690-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46690-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46689-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46690-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)