Skip to main content

Treating Many-Body Quantum Systems by Means of Classical Mechanics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Emergent Complexity from Nonlinearity, in Physics, Engineering and the Life Sciences

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Physics ((SPPHY,volume 191))

Abstract

Many-body physics of identical particles is commonly believed to be a sovereign territory of Quantum Mechanics. The aim of this contribution is to show that it is actually not the case and one gets useful insights into a quantum many-body system by using the theory of classical dynamical systems. In the contribution we focus on one paradigmatic model of many-body quantum physics - the Bose–Hubbard model which, in particular, describes interacting ultracold Bose atoms in an optical lattice . We show how one can find/deduce the energy spectrum of the Bose–Hubbard model by using a kind of the semiclassical approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This should be opposed to the Fermi–Hubbard model, where the spectrum can be found analytically by using the Betha ansatz.

  2. 2.

    A similar approach is based on the notion of the Wigner function [12,13,14]. The Husimi function , however, has an advantage that it is positively defined.

  3. 3.

    The effective Planck constant \(\hbar _{eff}=1/N\) should not be mismatched with the fundamental Planck constant \(\hbar \) which we set to unity from now on. We also mention that within the discussed formalism \(a_l\) and \(a_l^*\) are the canonical variables, i.e., one does not interpret them as order parameters.

  4. 4.

    Using one more canonical transformation, \(b_1=(a_1+a_2)/\sqrt{2}\) and \(b_2=(a_1-a_2)/\sqrt{2}\), one gets a different form of the effective Hamiltonian, which is similar to (14) in Sect. 5. Naturally, this does not affect the final results.

  5. 5.

    Slight asymmetry of \(\rho (E)\) with respect to \(E=0\) is related to the fact that L is odd. For even L (for example \(L=6\)) the distribution is perfectly symmetric, i.e., \(\rho (E)\) is an even function of E.

  6. 6.

    Regular localized solutions of DNLSE are known as discrete solitons or breathers [4].

  7. 7.

    For the periodic boundary conditions (which are used throughout the paper) the quantum BH model possesses additional, pure quantum integral of motion – the total quasimomentum \(\kappa =2\pi k/L\). Thus the whole spectrum can be decomposed into L independent spectra labeled by \(\kappa \). In Fig. 3 we choose \(\kappa =2\pi /L\) subspace. The results for other \(\kappa \) look similar, except the case \(\kappa =0\) where one should take into account the odd-even symmetry of the eigenstates.

  8. 8.

    Berry–Robnik’s statistics gives level-spacing distribution for a system with mixed phase space and interpolates between Poisson and Wigner–Dyson statistics.

  9. 9.

    Bloch oscillations are dynamical response of the system to an external static field. For non-interacting atoms these would be periodic oscillation of the mean atomic momentum with the Bloch frequency which is proportional to the field strength.

References

  1. Albiez, M., Gati, R., Fölling, J., Hunsmann, S., Cristiani, M., Oberthaler, M.K.: Direct observation of tunneling and nonlinear self-trapping in a single bosonic Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(1), 010,402 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bastidas, V.M., Engelhardt, G., Perez-Fernandez, P., Vogl, M., Brandes, T.: Critical quasi-energy states in driven many-body systems. Phys. Rev. A 90, 063628 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buchleitner, A., Kolovsky, A.R.: Interaction-induced decoherence of atomic Bloch oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 253,002 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell, D.K., Flach, S., Kivshar, Y.S.: Localizing energy through nonlinearity and discreteness. Phys. Today 57(1), 43–49 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Giannoni, M.-J., Voros, A., Zinn-Justin, J.: Chaos and Quantum Physics. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jaksch, D., Zoller, P.: The cold atom Hubbard toolbox. Annals of Phys. 315, 52 (2005)

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Jaksch, D., Bruder, C., Cirac, J., Gardiner, C., Zoller, P.: Cold bosonic atoms in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3108 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolovsky, A.R.: Conductivity with cold atoms in optical lattices. J. of Stat. Mech.: Theory and Exp. 2009, P02,018 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kolovsky, A.R., Korsch, H.J., Graefe, E.M.: Bloch oscillations of Bose-Einstein condensates: Quantum counterpart of dynamical instability. Phys. Rev. A 80, 023,617 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meinert, F., Mark, M.J., Kirilov, E., Lauber, K., Weinmann, P., Gröbner, M., Nägerl, H.C.: Interaction-induced quantum phase revivals and evidence for the transition to the quantum chaotic regime in 1d atomic Bloch oscillations. Phys.Rev. Lett. 112, 193,003 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Perelomov, A.M.: Generalized Coherent States and their Applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo (1986)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Polkovnikov, A.: Phase space representation of quantum dynamics. Annals of Phys. 325, 1790 (2010)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Sinatra, A., Lobo, C., Castin, Y.: The truncated Wigner method for Bose-condensed gases: Limits of validity and applications. J. of Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35, 3599 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Steel, M.J., Olsen, M.K., Plimak, L.I., Drummond, P.D., Tan, S.M., Collett, M.J., Walls, D.F., Graham, R.: Dynamical quantum noise in trapped Bose-Einstein condensates. Phys. Rev. A 58, 4824 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stöckmann, H.J.: Quantum Chaos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Trimborn, F., Witthaut, D., Korsch, H.J.: Exact number conserving phase-space dynamics of the \(M\)-site Bose–Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. A 77, 043,631 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrey R. Kolovsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kolovsky, A.R. (2017). Treating Many-Body Quantum Systems by Means of Classical Mechanics. In: Mantica, G., Stoop, R., Stramaglia, S. (eds) Emergent Complexity from Nonlinearity, in Physics, Engineering and the Life Sciences. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 191. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47810-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics