Skip to main content

Worldwide Pitch Quality for Prebaked Anodes

  • Chapter
Essential Readings in Light Metals

Abstract

A worldwide survey made on pitches supplied to Al smelters provides valuable information with regards to the typical values and specifications for binders.

The document reviews the effect of coke oven parameters on tar characteristics as well as distillation features on pitch properties. It provides an overview of the ISO analytical standards used for characterizing pitch, and includes guidelines on the specification settings. The link between pitch characteristics and anode performance is also summarized.

Addressing the evolution in the coke oven and tars distillers' industry over the last decades, it further discusses future challenges for the successful production and usage of binders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 319.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. H. Hulse, “Raw materials, Formulation and Processing Parameters”, R&D Carbon Ltd., 2000, ISBN 3–952 1028–5–7

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2. “Outlook for Coal Tar Pitch“, The Pace Consultants Inc., 1995

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3. “The Five Year Outlook for Carbon Products 2001”, CRU International Ltd., 2001

    Google Scholar 

  4. John T. Baron et al., “Plant Evaluation of Coal Tar/Petroleum Pitch Anode Binder”, Light Metals 1999, pp. 477 – 480

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. L. Saint Romain et al., “QI in coal tar pitches, Part 1”, Light Metals 1990, pp. 591 – 595

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. L. Saint Romain et al., “QI in coal tar pitches, Part 2”, Light Metals 1990, pp. 597 – 603

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. R. Romovacek, “The Impact of the Change of Coal Carbonization”, Light Metals 1985, pp. 793 – 803

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. R. Turner, “The Influence of Pitch QI Particle Type and Size on Anode Quality”, Light Metals 1992, pp. 571 – 580

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Lagassie et al., “Improvement of Feedstock Quality for Binder Pitch Preparation”, Light Metals 1992, pp. 593 – 597

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10. A. Alscher et al., “Evaluation of Electrode Binder Pitches”, Light Metals 1987, pp. 483 – 490

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Boenigk et al., “Production of low PAH Pitch for use in Soederberg Smelters”, Light Metals 2002, pp. 519 – 524

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Mirchi et al., “Reduction of the PAH Emissions for Horizontal Stud Soderberg Potrooms”, Light Metals 1995, pp. 601 – 607

    Google Scholar 

  13. H.-G. Franck und G. Collin, “Steinkohlenteer”, Springer-Verlag, 1968. Card Number 68–17539

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Kraay, “Coal Tar Pitch”, CII Carbon Symposium XVIIII, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  15. H.-G. Franck und A. Knop, “Kohleveredlung”, Springer-Verlag, 1979, ISBN 0–387–09627–2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. 16. H. Mallison, “Teer, Pech, Bitumen und Asphalt”, Band 7, Verlag Wihlem Knapp, Halle (Saale)

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Zander et al., “Average Molecular weight and Molecular Weight Distribution of Coal Tar Pitches”, Light Metals 1991, pp. 597 – 602

    Google Scholar 

  18. B.E.A. Thomas, “Elektrodenpech”, Bitumem-Teere-Asphalte-Peche und verwandte Stoffe”, Heft 7 + 8, 1961

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. W. Stadelhofer et al., “The Characterization of Binder Pitches (III)”, Light Metals 1983, pp. 1211 – 1221

    Google Scholar 

  20. W. Gemmecke et al., “The Characteristics of Binder Pitches (II)”, Light Metals 1974, Carbon, pp. 17 – 27

    Google Scholar 

  21. W. Gemmecke et al., “The Characterization of Binder Pitches”, Light Metals 1978, Vol. 1, pp. 335 – 366

    Google Scholar 

  22. H. Marsh et al., “The Structure and Behaviour of QI Material in Pitch”, Carbon 1985, Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 555 – 570

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. Acuna et al., “Petroleum Pitch, a real alternative to coal tar Pitch as Binder Material for Anode Production”, Light Metals 1997, pp. 549 – 554

    Google Scholar 

  24. N. Turner et al., “Development of Petroleum Enhanced Coal Tar Pitch in Europe”, Light Metals 2001, pp. 565 – 572

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. K. H. Briggs, “Viscosity of coal tar pitch at elevated temperatures”, Fuel 1980, Vol. 59, pp. 201 – 207

    Google Scholar 

  26. E. R. Mc Henry, “Development of Anode Binder Pitch Laboratory Characterization Methods”, Light Metals 1998, pp. 769 – 774

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. R. Ball, “The Influence of the Type of Quinoline Insolubles on the Quality of Coal Tar Binder Pitch”, Carbon 1978, Vol. 16, pp. 205 – 209

    Google Scholar 

  28. K. B. Petersen, “Effect of Sodium content of Pitch on Selective Oxidation on baked blends of Pitch/Fines”, Light Metals 1981, pp. 471 – 476

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29. G. R. Romovacek, “The Influence of solid Particles in Pitch on the Preparation and baking of the Carbon Blocks”, Light Metals 1977, Vol. 1, pp. 275 – 288

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. H. Wagner et al., “Quality assessment of binder pitches for carbon and graphite electrodes”, Fuel 1988, Vol. 67, pp. 792 – 797

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. R. Mc Henry, “The Effect of Thermal Treatment on Industrial Pitch and Carbon Anode Properties - Part 2”, Light Metals 1994, pp. 525 – 533

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32. A. Darney, “Conf. on Ind. Carbon and Graphite 1958”, pp. 125 – 131

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33. C. S. B. Nair, “Analytical Methods for Coal and Coal Products, Volume II”, pp. 496 – 530, Academic Press, ISBN 0–12–399 902–2

    Google Scholar 

  34. N. R. Turner, “Recent Trends in Binder Pitches for Reduction Anodes”, JOM, Nov. 1993, Vol. 45, pp. 39 – 43

    Google Scholar 

  35. C. R. Mason, “Correlations between pitch binder properties and properties of Soderber electrodes”, Fuel 1970, Vol. 49, No. 27, pp. 165 – 174

    Google Scholar 

  36. G. Bhatia et al., “A relationship for the evaluation of coking values of coal tar pitches from their physical characteristics”, J. of Mat. and Sci., 1987, Vol. 22, pp. 3847 – 3850

    Google Scholar 

  37. O. Malmros et al., “Increasing Pitch Yield by Thermal soaking of Coal Tar for Pitch Manufacture”, Light Metals 2000, pp. 543 – 547

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Perruchoud, R.C., Meier, M.W., Fischer, W. (2016). Worldwide Pitch Quality for Prebaked Anodes. In: Tomsett, A., Johnson, J. (eds) Essential Readings in Light Metals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48200-2_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics