Skip to main content

Relevance of the Chernobyl Research for the Evaluation of Genetic Radiation Risks in Humans

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Genetics, Evolution and Radiation

Abstract

The committee of the United Nations for the evaluation of radiation effects UNSCEAR up to now has derived a very low risk for hereditary diseases from experiments in mice. They claim that there are no human data to refer on, and missing effects in the Japanese A-bomb survivors are erroneously generalized for cases of chronic exposures. Vladimir A. Shevchenko criticized their estimates already soon after the Chernobyl accident (Shevchenko 1997). He stated that the main contribution of possible effects as many congenital malformations and all polygenic diseases were left out. He also demanded that the estimates must include the following generations until equilibrium of heritable defects is reached, while the committee considers only the first generation. Shevchenko referred to the rising rates in the Belarussian central registry for congenital anomalies after 1986 and emphasized the importance of biological dosimetry by cytogenetic analysis in order to receive realistic information about the population exposure. We made a compilation of findings about early deaths, congenital malformations, Down’s syndrome , cancer and other effects, which were observed in humans after exposure of parents. Few of them are available from occupationally exposed collectives, much information can be drawn from studies in populations exposed by Chernobyl fallout and from the descendants of liquidators. Nearly all types of hereditary defects were found, which are to be expected according to our general knowledge about it. It can clearly be shown that the official risk estimates are much too low.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The authors wanted to study the reverse, however, if the male births will decline with dose.

References

  • Akar N, Cavdar AO, Arcasoy A (1988) High incidence of Neural Tube defects in Bursa, Turkey. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2:89–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Akar N, Ata Y, Aytekin AF (1989) Neural Tube defects and Chernobyl? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 3:102–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanovich IP (1997) Comparative analysis of the death rate of children, aged 0–5, in 1994 in radiocontaminated and conventionally clean areas of Belarus. In: Medicobiological effects and the ways of overcoming the Chernobyl accident consequence. Collected book of scientific papers dedicated to the 10th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident. Minsk-Vitebsk, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby C, Lengfelder E, Pflugbeil S et al (2009) The evidence of radiation effects in embryos and fetuses exposed to Chernobyl fallout and the question of dose response. Med Confl Surviv 25:20–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caglayan S, Kayhan B, Mentesoglu S et al (1990) Changing incidence of neural tube defects in Aegean Turkey. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 4:264–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DW (1964) An investigation of possible genetic damage in the offspring of women receiving multiple diagnostic pelviv X-rays. Am J Hum Genet 16:214–230

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Choi JW, Mehrotra P, MacDonald LA et al (2007) Sex proportion of offspring and exposure to radiation in male invasive cardiologists. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 20:231–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson HO, Parker L (2002) Leukaemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in children of male Sellafield radiation workers. Int J Cancer 99:437–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson HO, Parker L, Binks K et al (1996) The sex ratio of children in relation to paternal preconceptional radiation dose: a study in Cumbria, northern England. J Epidemiol Community Health 50:645–652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Feshchenko SP, Schroeder HC, Mueller WEG et al (2002) Congenital malformations among newborns and developmental abnormalities among human embryos in Belarus after Chernobyl accident. Cell Mol Biol 48:423–426

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner MJ, Snee MP, Hall AJ et al (1990) Results of case-control study of leukaemia and lymphoma among young people near Sellafield nuclear plant in West Cumbria. Brit Med J 300:423–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Godlevsky I, Nasvit O (1998) Dynamics of health status of residents in the Lugyny district after the accident of the ChNPS. In: Imanaka T (ed) Research activities about the radiological consequences of the Chernobyl NPS accident and social activities to assist the sufferers by the accident. Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, KURRI-KR-21, pp 149–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of West Berlin, Section of Health and Social Affairs. Annual Health Report 1987

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham S, Levin ML, Lilienfeld AM et al (1966) Preconception, intrauterine, and postnatal irradiation as related to leukemia. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 19:347–371

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Güvenc H, Uslu MA, Güvenc M et al (1993) Changing trend of neural tube defects in Eastern Turkey. J Epidemiol Community Health 47:40–41

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks N, Zack M, Caldwell GG et al (1984) Childhood cancer and occupational radiation exposure in parents. Cancer 53:1637–1643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ICRP, International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP-Publication 103, Ann ICRP 37 Nos. 2–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Korblein A (2004) Fehlbildungen in Bayern nach Tschernobyl. Strahlentelex 416–417:4–6. www.strahlentelex.de

  • Kruslin B, Jukic S, Kos M et al (1998) Congenital anomalies of the central nervous system at autopsy in Croatia in the period before and after Chernobyl. Acta Med Croatica 52:103–107

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kulakov VI, Sokur TN, Volobuev AI et al (1993) Female reproduction function in areas affected by radiation after the Chernobyl power station accident. Environ Health Persp 101(Suppl. 2):117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazjuk GI, Nikolaev DL, Novikova IV (1997) Changes in registered congenital anomalies in the Republic of Belarus after the Chernobyl accident. Stem Cells 15(Suppl 2):255–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazjuk G, Satow Y, Nikolaev D et al (1999) Genetic consequences of the Chernobyl accident for Belarus Republic. In: Imanaka T (ed) Recent Research Activities on the Chernobyl NPP Accident in Belarus, Ukraine and Russia, KURRI-KR-7 (Kyoto University, Kyoto), pp 174–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomat L, Galburt G, Quastel MR et al (1997) Incidence of childhood disease in Belarus associated with the Chernobyl accident. Environ Health Persp 105(Suppl 6):1529–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotz B, Haerting J, Schulze E (1996) Veränderungen im fetalen und kindlichen Sektionsgut im Raum Jena nach dem Reaktorunfall von Tschernobyl. Oral presentation at the Int Conf of the Society for Medical Documentation, Statistics, and Epidemiology. Bonn, Germany (Available on request)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyaginskaja AM, Tukov AR, Osipov VA et al (2009) Congenital malformations at posterity of the liquidators of the consequences from Chernobyl accident. Radiat Biol Radioecol 49:694–702 (Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Macht S, Lawrence P (1955) National Survey of congenital malformations resulting from exposure to Roentgen radiation. Am J Roentgenol 73:442–466

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matveenko EG, Borovykova MP, Davydow GA (2005) Physical characteristics and primary morbidity in liquidator’s children. In: Proceedings of Conference on “Chernobyl 20 Years After” (cited from Yablokov et al. 2009: 148)

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney PA, Alexander FE, Cartwright RA et al (1991) Parental occupations of children with leukemia in west Cumbria, north Humberside, and Gateshead. Brit Med J 302:681–687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mocan H, Bozkaya H, Mocan ZM et al (1990) Changing incidence of anencephaly in the eastern Black Sea region of Turkey and Chernobyl. Paediatric Perinatal Epidemiol 4:264–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moumdjiev N, Nedkova V, Christova V et al (1994) Influence of the Chernobyl reactor accident on the child health in the region of Pleven, Bulgaria. In: 20th Int Congr Pediatrics Sept 6–10, 1992 in Brasil: 57 (Cited by Akar N. Further notes on neural tube defects and Chernobyl (Letter). Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 8:456–457)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller HJ (1936) Über die Wirkung der Röntgenstrahlung auf die Erbmasse. Strahlentherapie 55:207–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Natarajan N, Bross IDJ (1973) Preconception radiation leukemia. J Med 4:276–281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nomura T (1982) Parental exposure to X-rays and chemicals induces heritable tumours and anomalies in mice. Nature 296:575–577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nomura T (2006) Transgenerational effects of radiation and chemicals in mice and humans. J Radiat Res 47(Suppl):B83–B97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker L, Pearce MS, Dickinson HO et al (1999) Stillbirths among offspring of male radiation workers at Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant. Lancet 354:1407–1414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petrova A, Gnedko T, Maistrova I et al (1997) Morbidity in a large cohort study of children born to mothers exposed to radiation from Chernobyl. Stem Cells 6(Suppl 2):141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Savchenko VK (1995) The ecology of the Chernobyl catastrophe. In: Scientific outlines of an international programme of collaborative research. Man and the Biosphere Series 17. UNESCO Paris: 83

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherb H, Weigelt E (2004) Cleft lip and cleft palate birth rate in Bavaria before and after the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 8:106–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherb H, Voigt K (2007) Trends in the human sex odds at birth in Europe and the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident. Reprod Toxicol 23:593–599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherb H, Voigt K (2011) The human sex odds at birth after the atmospheric atomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:697–707

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scherb H, Sperling K (2011) Heutige Lehren aus dem Reaktorunfall von Tschernobyl. Naturwiss Rundschau 64 Heft 5:229–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherb H, Voigt K, Kusmierz R (2012) Modelling human radiation risks around nuclear facilities in Germany and Switzerland: a case study. In: Seppelt R et al (eds) Int Congr Environ Modelling and Software Managing Resources of a Limited Planet. Sixth Biennial Meeting, Leipzig, Germany http://www.iemss.org/society/index.php/iemss-2012-proceedings

  • Schmitz-Feuerhake I (2009) How reliable are the dose estimates of UNSCEAR for populations contaminated by Chernobyl fallout? A comparison of results by physical reconstruction and biological dosimetry. In: Proceedings of ECRR International Conference on “Criticisms and Developments in the Assessment of Radiation Risks” in Molyvos, Lesbos, Greece, 2011, pp 70–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Sever LE, Gilbert ES, Hessol NA et al (1988) A case-control study of congenital malformations and occupational exposure to low-level ionizing radiation. Am J Epidemiol 127:226–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shakhatreh FM (2001) Reproductive health of male radiographers. Saudi Med J 22:150–152

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shevchenko VA, Platonov ES, Snigiryova GP (1997) Genetic consequences of disaster at Chernobyl nuclear plant on April 26, 1986. In: Nesterenko VB (ed) Reasons and consequences. International association for restoration of the environment and for safe living of people “Senmurv” (Minsk-Moscow-Kiev, Chernobyl Accident, Minsk, pp 213–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Shidlovskii PR (1992) General morbidity of the population in districts of the Brest region. Zdravoohranenie Belorussii (Minsk) 1:8–11 (Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiono PH, Chung CS, Myrianthopoulos NC (1980) Preconception radiation, intrauterine diagnostic radiation, and childhood neoplasia. J Natl Cancer 65:681–686

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shu XO, Gao YT, Brinton LA et al (1988) A population-based case-control study of childhood leukemia in Shanghai. Cancer 62:635–644

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shu XO, Reaman GH, Lampkin B et al (1994) Association of paternal diagnostic x-ray exposure with risk of infant leukemia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 3:645–653

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sperling K, Neitzel H, Scherb H (2012) Evidence for an increase in trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) in Europe after the Chernobyl reactor accident. Genet Epidemiol 36:48–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart A, Webb J, Hewitt D (1958) A survey of childhood malignancies. Brit Med J 1:1495–1508

    Google Scholar 

  • Sviatova GS, Abil’dinova GZ, Berezina GM (2001) Frequency, dynamics, and structure of congenital malformations in populations under long-term exposure to ionizing radiation. Russ J Genetics 37:1696–1704 (Russian)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsyb AF, Souchkevitch GN, Lyasko LI et al (2004) General characterization of health in first-generation offspring born to liquidators of the Chernobyl NPP accident consequences. Int J Radiat Med 6 (1–4):116–121. http://www.mns.gov.ua (Special Issue )

  • Uma Devi P, Nagarathnam A, Satish Rao BS (2000) Introduction to radiation biology. B.I. Churchill Livingstone PVT Ltd., New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSCEAR (1988) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation. 1988 Report to the General Assembly, United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSCEAR (2001) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: Hereditary effects of radiation. 2001 Report to the General Assembly, United Nations, New York. www.unscear.org

  • Vogel F et al (1969) Strahlen Genetik der Säuger, 1. Fortschritte der allgemeinen und klinischen Humangenetik. In: Becker E et al (eds). Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertelecki W (2010) Malformations in a Chernobyl-impacted region. Pediatrics 125:836–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertelecki W, Yevtushok L, Zymak-Zakutnia N et al (2014) Blastopathies and microcephaly in a Chornobyl impacted region of Ukraine. Congenital Anomalies 54:125–149

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesel A, Spix C, Mergenthaler A, Queißer-Luft A (2011) Maternal occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and birth defects. Radiat Environ Biophys 50:325–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yablokov AV (2006) The Chernobyl catastrophe—20 years later. In: Busby CC, Yablokov AV (eds) European Committee on Radiation Risk ECRR. Chernobyl: 20 years on. Green Audit www.euradcom.org

  • Yablokov AV, Nesterenko VB, Nesterenko AV (2009) Chernobyl—Consequences of the catastrophe for people and the environment. Ann NY Acad Sci 1181 (Boston)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zatsepin IO, Verger P, Robert-Gnansia E et al (2004) Cluster of Down’s syndrome cases registered in January 1987 in Republic of Belarus as a possible effect of the Chernobyl accident. Int J Radiat Med 6(1–4):57–71. http://www.mns.gov.ua (Special Issue)

  • Zieglowski V, Hemprich A (1993) Facial cleft birth rate in former East Germany before and after the reactor accident in Chernobyl. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 3:195–199 (German)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmitz-Feuerhake, I., Pflugbeil, S. (2016). Relevance of the Chernobyl Research for the Evaluation of Genetic Radiation Risks in Humans. In: Korogodina, V., Mothersill, C., Inge-Vechtomov, S., Seymour, C. (eds) Genetics, Evolution and Radiation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48838-7_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics