Abstract
The committee of the United Nations for the evaluation of radiation effects UNSCEAR up to now has derived a very low risk for hereditary diseases from experiments in mice. They claim that there are no human data to refer on, and missing effects in the Japanese A-bomb survivors are erroneously generalized for cases of chronic exposures. Vladimir A. Shevchenko criticized their estimates already soon after the Chernobyl accident (Shevchenko 1997). He stated that the main contribution of possible effects as many congenital malformations and all polygenic diseases were left out. He also demanded that the estimates must include the following generations until equilibrium of heritable defects is reached, while the committee considers only the first generation. Shevchenko referred to the rising rates in the Belarussian central registry for congenital anomalies after 1986 and emphasized the importance of biological dosimetry by cytogenetic analysis in order to receive realistic information about the population exposure. We made a compilation of findings about early deaths, congenital malformations, Down’s syndrome , cancer and other effects, which were observed in humans after exposure of parents. Few of them are available from occupationally exposed collectives, much information can be drawn from studies in populations exposed by Chernobyl fallout and from the descendants of liquidators. Nearly all types of hereditary defects were found, which are to be expected according to our general knowledge about it. It can clearly be shown that the official risk estimates are much too low.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The authors wanted to study the reverse, however, if the male births will decline with dose.
References
Akar N, Cavdar AO, Arcasoy A (1988) High incidence of Neural Tube defects in Bursa, Turkey. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2:89–92
Akar N, Ata Y, Aytekin AF (1989) Neural Tube defects and Chernobyl? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 3:102–103
Bogdanovich IP (1997) Comparative analysis of the death rate of children, aged 0–5, in 1994 in radiocontaminated and conventionally clean areas of Belarus. In: Medicobiological effects and the ways of overcoming the Chernobyl accident consequence. Collected book of scientific papers dedicated to the 10th anniversary of the Chernobyl accident. Minsk-Vitebsk, p 4
Busby C, Lengfelder E, Pflugbeil S et al (2009) The evidence of radiation effects in embryos and fetuses exposed to Chernobyl fallout and the question of dose response. Med Confl Surviv 25:20–40
Caglayan S, Kayhan B, Mentesoglu S et al (1990) Changing incidence of neural tube defects in Aegean Turkey. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 4:264–268
Cox DW (1964) An investigation of possible genetic damage in the offspring of women receiving multiple diagnostic pelviv X-rays. Am J Hum Genet 16:214–230
Choi JW, Mehrotra P, MacDonald LA et al (2007) Sex proportion of offspring and exposure to radiation in male invasive cardiologists. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 20:231–234
Dickinson HO, Parker L (2002) Leukaemia and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in children of male Sellafield radiation workers. Int J Cancer 99:437–444
Dickinson HO, Parker L, Binks K et al (1996) The sex ratio of children in relation to paternal preconceptional radiation dose: a study in Cumbria, northern England. J Epidemiol Community Health 50:645–652
Feshchenko SP, Schroeder HC, Mueller WEG et al (2002) Congenital malformations among newborns and developmental abnormalities among human embryos in Belarus after Chernobyl accident. Cell Mol Biol 48:423–426
Gardner MJ, Snee MP, Hall AJ et al (1990) Results of case-control study of leukaemia and lymphoma among young people near Sellafield nuclear plant in West Cumbria. Brit Med J 300:423–429
Godlevsky I, Nasvit O (1998) Dynamics of health status of residents in the Lugyny district after the accident of the ChNPS. In: Imanaka T (ed) Research activities about the radiological consequences of the Chernobyl NPS accident and social activities to assist the sufferers by the accident. Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, KURRI-KR-21, pp 149–156
Government of West Berlin, Section of Health and Social Affairs. Annual Health Report 1987
Graham S, Levin ML, Lilienfeld AM et al (1966) Preconception, intrauterine, and postnatal irradiation as related to leukemia. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 19:347–371
Güvenc H, Uslu MA, Güvenc M et al (1993) Changing trend of neural tube defects in Eastern Turkey. J Epidemiol Community Health 47:40–41
Hicks N, Zack M, Caldwell GG et al (1984) Childhood cancer and occupational radiation exposure in parents. Cancer 53:1637–1643
ICRP, International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP-Publication 103, Ann ICRP 37 Nos. 2–4
Korblein A (2004) Fehlbildungen in Bayern nach Tschernobyl. Strahlentelex 416–417:4–6. www.strahlentelex.de
Kruslin B, Jukic S, Kos M et al (1998) Congenital anomalies of the central nervous system at autopsy in Croatia in the period before and after Chernobyl. Acta Med Croatica 52:103–107
Kulakov VI, Sokur TN, Volobuev AI et al (1993) Female reproduction function in areas affected by radiation after the Chernobyl power station accident. Environ Health Persp 101(Suppl. 2):117–123
Lazjuk GI, Nikolaev DL, Novikova IV (1997) Changes in registered congenital anomalies in the Republic of Belarus after the Chernobyl accident. Stem Cells 15(Suppl 2):255–260
Lazjuk G, Satow Y, Nikolaev D et al (1999) Genetic consequences of the Chernobyl accident for Belarus Republic. In: Imanaka T (ed) Recent Research Activities on the Chernobyl NPP Accident in Belarus, Ukraine and Russia, KURRI-KR-7 (Kyoto University, Kyoto), pp 174–177
Lomat L, Galburt G, Quastel MR et al (1997) Incidence of childhood disease in Belarus associated with the Chernobyl accident. Environ Health Persp 105(Suppl 6):1529–1532
Lotz B, Haerting J, Schulze E (1996) Veränderungen im fetalen und kindlichen Sektionsgut im Raum Jena nach dem Reaktorunfall von Tschernobyl. Oral presentation at the Int Conf of the Society for Medical Documentation, Statistics, and Epidemiology. Bonn, Germany (Available on request)
Lyaginskaja AM, Tukov AR, Osipov VA et al (2009) Congenital malformations at posterity of the liquidators of the consequences from Chernobyl accident. Radiat Biol Radioecol 49:694–702 (Russian)
Macht S, Lawrence P (1955) National Survey of congenital malformations resulting from exposure to Roentgen radiation. Am J Roentgenol 73:442–466
Matveenko EG, Borovykova MP, Davydow GA (2005) Physical characteristics and primary morbidity in liquidator’s children. In: Proceedings of Conference on “Chernobyl 20 Years After” (cited from Yablokov et al. 2009: 148)
McKinney PA, Alexander FE, Cartwright RA et al (1991) Parental occupations of children with leukemia in west Cumbria, north Humberside, and Gateshead. Brit Med J 302:681–687
Mocan H, Bozkaya H, Mocan ZM et al (1990) Changing incidence of anencephaly in the eastern Black Sea region of Turkey and Chernobyl. Paediatric Perinatal Epidemiol 4:264–268
Moumdjiev N, Nedkova V, Christova V et al (1994) Influence of the Chernobyl reactor accident on the child health in the region of Pleven, Bulgaria. In: 20th Int Congr Pediatrics Sept 6–10, 1992 in Brasil: 57 (Cited by Akar N. Further notes on neural tube defects and Chernobyl (Letter). Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 8:456–457)
Muller HJ (1936) Über die Wirkung der Röntgenstrahlung auf die Erbmasse. Strahlentherapie 55:207–224
Natarajan N, Bross IDJ (1973) Preconception radiation leukemia. J Med 4:276–281
Nomura T (1982) Parental exposure to X-rays and chemicals induces heritable tumours and anomalies in mice. Nature 296:575–577
Nomura T (2006) Transgenerational effects of radiation and chemicals in mice and humans. J Radiat Res 47(Suppl):B83–B97
Parker L, Pearce MS, Dickinson HO et al (1999) Stillbirths among offspring of male radiation workers at Sellafield nuclear reprocessing plant. Lancet 354:1407–1414
Petrova A, Gnedko T, Maistrova I et al (1997) Morbidity in a large cohort study of children born to mothers exposed to radiation from Chernobyl. Stem Cells 6(Suppl 2):141–150
Savchenko VK (1995) The ecology of the Chernobyl catastrophe. In: Scientific outlines of an international programme of collaborative research. Man and the Biosphere Series 17. UNESCO Paris: 83
Scherb H, Weigelt E (2004) Cleft lip and cleft palate birth rate in Bavaria before and after the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 8:106–110
Scherb H, Voigt K (2007) Trends in the human sex odds at birth in Europe and the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident. Reprod Toxicol 23:593–599
Scherb H, Voigt K (2011) The human sex odds at birth after the atmospheric atomic bomb tests, after Chernobyl, and in the vicinity of nuclear facilities. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:697–707
Scherb H, Sperling K (2011) Heutige Lehren aus dem Reaktorunfall von Tschernobyl. Naturwiss Rundschau 64 Heft 5:229–239
Scherb H, Voigt K, Kusmierz R (2012) Modelling human radiation risks around nuclear facilities in Germany and Switzerland: a case study. In: Seppelt R et al (eds) Int Congr Environ Modelling and Software Managing Resources of a Limited Planet. Sixth Biennial Meeting, Leipzig, Germany http://www.iemss.org/society/index.php/iemss-2012-proceedings
Schmitz-Feuerhake I (2009) How reliable are the dose estimates of UNSCEAR for populations contaminated by Chernobyl fallout? A comparison of results by physical reconstruction and biological dosimetry. In: Proceedings of ECRR International Conference on “Criticisms and Developments in the Assessment of Radiation Risks” in Molyvos, Lesbos, Greece, 2011, pp 70–85
Sever LE, Gilbert ES, Hessol NA et al (1988) A case-control study of congenital malformations and occupational exposure to low-level ionizing radiation. Am J Epidemiol 127:226–242
Shakhatreh FM (2001) Reproductive health of male radiographers. Saudi Med J 22:150–152
Shevchenko VA, Platonov ES, Snigiryova GP (1997) Genetic consequences of disaster at Chernobyl nuclear plant on April 26, 1986. In: Nesterenko VB (ed) Reasons and consequences. International association for restoration of the environment and for safe living of people “Senmurv” (Minsk-Moscow-Kiev, Chernobyl Accident, Minsk, pp 213–245
Shidlovskii PR (1992) General morbidity of the population in districts of the Brest region. Zdravoohranenie Belorussii (Minsk) 1:8–11 (Russian)
Shiono PH, Chung CS, Myrianthopoulos NC (1980) Preconception radiation, intrauterine diagnostic radiation, and childhood neoplasia. J Natl Cancer 65:681–686
Shu XO, Gao YT, Brinton LA et al (1988) A population-based case-control study of childhood leukemia in Shanghai. Cancer 62:635–644
Shu XO, Reaman GH, Lampkin B et al (1994) Association of paternal diagnostic x-ray exposure with risk of infant leukemia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 3:645–653
Sperling K, Neitzel H, Scherb H (2012) Evidence for an increase in trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) in Europe after the Chernobyl reactor accident. Genet Epidemiol 36:48–55
Stewart A, Webb J, Hewitt D (1958) A survey of childhood malignancies. Brit Med J 1:1495–1508
Sviatova GS, Abil’dinova GZ, Berezina GM (2001) Frequency, dynamics, and structure of congenital malformations in populations under long-term exposure to ionizing radiation. Russ J Genetics 37:1696–1704 (Russian)
Tsyb AF, Souchkevitch GN, Lyasko LI et al (2004) General characterization of health in first-generation offspring born to liquidators of the Chernobyl NPP accident consequences. Int J Radiat Med 6 (1–4):116–121. http://www.mns.gov.ua (Special Issue )
Uma Devi P, Nagarathnam A, Satish Rao BS (2000) Introduction to radiation biology. B.I. Churchill Livingstone PVT Ltd., New Delhi
UNSCEAR (1988) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation. 1988 Report to the General Assembly, United Nations, New York
UNSCEAR (2001) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: Hereditary effects of radiation. 2001 Report to the General Assembly, United Nations, New York. www.unscear.org
Vogel F et al (1969) Strahlen Genetik der Säuger, 1. Fortschritte der allgemeinen und klinischen Humangenetik. In: Becker E et al (eds). Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart
Wertelecki W (2010) Malformations in a Chernobyl-impacted region. Pediatrics 125:836–843
Wertelecki W, Yevtushok L, Zymak-Zakutnia N et al (2014) Blastopathies and microcephaly in a Chornobyl impacted region of Ukraine. Congenital Anomalies 54:125–149
Wiesel A, Spix C, Mergenthaler A, Queißer-Luft A (2011) Maternal occupational exposure to ionizing radiation and birth defects. Radiat Environ Biophys 50:325–328
Yablokov AV (2006) The Chernobyl catastrophe—20 years later. In: Busby CC, Yablokov AV (eds) European Committee on Radiation Risk ECRR. Chernobyl: 20 years on. Green Audit www.euradcom.org
Yablokov AV, Nesterenko VB, Nesterenko AV (2009) Chernobyl—Consequences of the catastrophe for people and the environment. Ann NY Acad Sci 1181 (Boston)
Zatsepin IO, Verger P, Robert-Gnansia E et al (2004) Cluster of Down’s syndrome cases registered in January 1987 in Republic of Belarus as a possible effect of the Chernobyl accident. Int J Radiat Med 6(1–4):57–71. http://www.mns.gov.ua (Special Issue)
Zieglowski V, Hemprich A (1993) Facial cleft birth rate in former East Germany before and after the reactor accident in Chernobyl. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 3:195–199 (German)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schmitz-Feuerhake, I., Pflugbeil, S. (2016). Relevance of the Chernobyl Research for the Evaluation of Genetic Radiation Risks in Humans. In: Korogodina, V., Mothersill, C., Inge-Vechtomov, S., Seymour, C. (eds) Genetics, Evolution and Radiation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48838-7_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48838-7_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48837-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48838-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)