Skip to main content

Supporting Management of Hybrid OSS Communities - A Stakeholder Analysis Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2016)

Abstract

In Hybrid Open Source Software projects, independent and commercially oriented stakeholders collaborate using freely accessible tools and development processes. Here, contributors can enter and leave the community flexibly, which poses a challenge for community managers in ensuring the sustainability of the community. This short paper reports initial results from an industrial case study of the “Qt” Open Source Software project. We present a visual stakeholder analysis approach, building on data from the three systems that provide for the Qt project’s complete software development workflow. This overview, augmented with information about the stakeholders’ organizational affiliations, proved to help the project’s community manager in finding potential for encouraging contributors and to identify issues that can potentially be detrimental for the community.

The original version of this chapter was revised: The chapter title has been corrected. An erratum to this chapter can be found at DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_66

An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_66

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    GPL, LGPL v2.1, LGPL v3.

  2. 2.

    theqtcompany.com, digia.com, qt-project.org.

  3. 3.

    kde.org, kdab.org, redhat.org.

  4. 4.

    jolla.com, mrisoftware.com, basyscom.com.

  5. 5.

    gmail.com, yeandex.ru, hotmail.com.

References

  1. Adamic, L.A., Baeza-Yates, R.A., Counts, S. (eds.): Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, July 17–21, 2011. The AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Concas, G., Lisci, M., Pinna, S., Porruvecchio, G., Uras, S.: Analysing the social networks constituted by open source communities. In: International Electronic Conference on Computer Science, vol. 1060, pp. 147–150 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crowston, K., Howison, J.: Hierarchy and centralization in free and open source software team communications. Knowl. Technol. Policy 18(4), 65–85 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Digia annual report (2014). http://vuosikertomus2014.digia.com/filebank/132-Digia-Annual-Report-2014.pdf. Accessed 08 Sep 2015

  5. Free software definition (2015). http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html. Accessed 18 Sep 2015

  6. Lakhani, K., Wolf, R.G.: Why hackers do what they do: understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. In: MIT Sloan Working Paper No. 4425–03 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Long, Y., Siau, K.: Social network structures in open source software development teams. J. Database Manage. 18(2), 25–40 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oezbek, C., Prechelt, L., Thiel, F.: The onion has cancer: some social network analysis visualizations of open source project communication. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Emerging Trends in Free/Libre/Open Source Software Research and Development (FLOSS 2010), pp. 5–10 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Runeson, P., Höst, M.: Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. Empirical Softw. Eng. 14(2), 131–164 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shen, C., Monge, P.: Who connects with whom? A social network analysis of an online open source software community. First Monday 16(6) (2011). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3551

  11. Von Krogh, G., Haefliger, S., Spaeth, S., Wallin, M.W.: Carrots and rainbows: motivation and social practice in open source software development. MIS Q. 36(2), 649–676 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Watson, R.T., Boudreau, M.-C., York, P.T., Greiner, M.E., Wynn Jr., D.: The business of open source. Commun. ACM 51(4), 41–46 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage publications, Thousand Oaks (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is funded by DIMECC’s Need4Speed program (http://www.n4s.fi/) and the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation Tekes (http://www.tekes.fi/en/tekes/).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna Mäenpää .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mäenpää, H. et al. (2016). Supporting Management of Hybrid OSS Communities - A Stakeholder Analysis Approach. In: Abrahamsson, P., Jedlitschka, A., Nguyen Duc, A., Felderer, M., Amasaki, S., Mikkonen, T. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10027. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49094-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49093-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49094-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics