Abstract
In Sect. 3.2.1, the objectives of electricity distribution organisations for maintenance improvement on strategic level are described. A concept of a model for cyclic continuous maintenance improvement is provided in Sect. 3.2.2. In Sect. 3.2.3, the organisational elements that play a key role are described. In order to set the reference point at start and to be able to accurately determine the improvements, a maintenance management maturity model (M4) is developed and described with results in Sect. 3.3. Usually, decisions are taken from top to the bottom of an organisation, while, conversely, the performance reporting occurs from bottom to top. For this purpose, in Sect. 3.4, a methodology for maintenance key performance indicators is elaborated on. In Sect. 3.5, an outlook to the Chap. 4 is given.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anthony, R. N. (1965). Planning and control systems: A framework for analysis. SL: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
Fernandez, J. F. G., & Marquez, A. C. (2012). Maintenance management in network utilities—Framework & practical implementation. London: Springer.
Jardine, A. K. S., & Tsang, A. H. C. (2013). Maintenance, replacement, and reliability: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). SL: CRC Press.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. SL: Harvard Business Review Press.
Mehairjan, R. P. Y. et al. (2012a). Organisation-wide maintenance & inspection improvement plan. London, IET/IEEE.
Mehairjan, R. P. Y. et al. (2012b). Organisation-wide maintenance & inspection improvement plan: A dutch electricity & gas distribution network operators approach. London, SN.
Mehairjan, R. P. Y. et al. (2012c). Statistical approach to establish failure behaviour on incomplete asset lifetime data. Bali, Indonesia, SN.
Mehairjan, R. P. Y., van Hattem, M., Djairam, D., & Smit, J. J. (2015a). Development and implementation of a maturity model for professionalising maintenance management. SN: Springer.
Mehairjan, R. P. Y., van Hattem, M., Djairam, D., & Smit, J. J. (2015b). Risk-based approach to maintenance management applied on power transformers. Proceedings of 2014 world congress on engineering asset management (pp. 415–434). London, UK: Springer International Publishing.
Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993). Capability maturity model for software. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.
Pintelon, L., & van Puyvelde, F. (2013). Asset management—The maintenance perspective. Asset management—The maintenance perspective. Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
Volker, L., van der Lei, T., & Ligtvoet, A. (2013a). Developing a maturity model for infrastructural asset management systems. Berlin: Delft University of Technology.
Volker, L., et al. (2013b). Asset management maturity in public infrastructures; the case of Rijkswaterstaat. International Journal of Strategic Engineering Asset Management, 1(4), 439–453.
Wireman, T. (2005). Developing performance indicators for managing maintenance. Developing performance indicators for managing maintenance. SL: Industrial Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mehairjan, R.P.Y. (2017). Organisation-Wide Maintenance Improvement Framework. In: Risk-Based Maintenance for Electricity Network Organizations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49235-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49235-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-49234-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-49235-3
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)