Skip to main content

Conclusion: “Uncomforable Proximity” and the Ethics of Display

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Syphilis in Victorian Literature and Culture

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine ((PLSM))

  • 439 Accesses

Abstract

The conclusion reconsiders the significance of syphilis in late nineteenth century culture. It also inquires to what extent contemporary creative and critical revisions can be regarded as adequate instruments in the rethinking of this issue. By contending that both critical and creative reconsiderations of syphilis’s semantics have themselves been prone to binary thinking, it calls for a more ethical engagement with Victorian culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Basu, Kunal. The Yellow Emperor’s Cure. New York: Overlook Duckworth, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, Katy. The Whore Asylum or The Unpierc’d Heart. London: Fig Tree, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Uncomfortable Proximity. Intermedia Art. New Media, Sound and Performance. 2000. Web. 22 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman, Sheri. The Dress Lodger. New York: Atlantic Monthly P, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, Maggie. Lily. London: Simon & Schuster, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, John. Endurance and Suffering: Narratives of Disease in the Nineteenth Century. Vevais, Germany: Edition Galerie Vevais, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, Rosario, and Patricia Pulham, eds. Haunting and Spectrality in Neo-Victorian Fiction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouliaraki, Lilie. The Spectatorship of Suffering. London, Thousand Oaks, Los Angeles CA: Sage, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, Simon. The Ethics of Deconstruction: Derrida and Levinas. 1992. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. Specters of Marx. The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International. 1993. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge Classics, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, and Mark Llewellyn. Neo-Victorianism: The Victorians in the Twenty-First Century, 1999–2009. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, Simon. The Victorians in the Rearview Mirror. Athens: Ohio UP, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Cora. Victoriana: Histories, Fictions, Criticism. New York: Columbia UP, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, Christine L. Introduction. Functions of Victorian Culture at the Present Time. By Krueger. Athens: Ohio UP, 2002. ix–xxx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucich, John, and Dianne F. Sadoff. Victorian Afterlife: Postmodern Culture Rewrites the Nineteenth Century. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munford, Rebecca, and Paul Young. “Introduction: Engaging the Victorians.” Literature, Interpretation, Theory 10 (2009): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perpich, Diane. The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrzak-Franger, Monika. “‘Those Ill Things.’ On Hidden Spectactles and the Ethics of Display.” Neo-Victorian Studies 4.2 (2011): 24–48. Web. 14 January 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibbald, Barbara. “Imagined Lives.” CMAJ 180:1 (2009): 80–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Picador, 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Voigts-Virchow, Eckart. “In-yer-Victorian-Face: A Subcultural Hermeneutics of Neo-Victorianism.” Literature Interpretation Theory 20.1 (2009): 108–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pietrzak-Franger, M. (2017). Conclusion: “Uncomforable Proximity” and the Ethics of Display. In: Syphilis in Victorian Literature and Culture. Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49535-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics