Skip to main content

Abstract

Marketers have discovered the power of utilizing images in advertisements as a means to convey the experience of their product offerings. Advertising images of human models engaging in the product experience have the power to create self- referent schema storylines, emit emotions, and effect attitudes and behavior intentions toward that of the product. However, little research has been done to investigate the effect of a model’s image on the ability to fully engage the participant in self- referent processing. Does an abstract image of the model allow for the participant to transport themselves into the role of the model more easily than that of an image which clearly shows the distinguishing features of the model?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bone, P.F. and P.S. Ellen 1992, “The Generation and Consequences of Communication Evoked Imagery,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 93-104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Polly, Janice M. Keenan, and George R. Potts 1986, “The Self-Reference Effect with Imagery Encoding,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (5), 897-906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerrig, Richard J. 1993. Experiencing Narrative Worlds. New Haven,CT: Yale Univ. Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Green. Melanie C., and TimothyC. Brock 2000. “The Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701-721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisielius, Jolita and Brian Sternthal 1984. “Detecting and Explaining Viivdness Effects in Attitudinal Judgments,” Journal of Marketing Research, 21 (February), 54-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisielius, Jolita and Brian Sternthal 1986. “Examining the Vividness Controversy: An Availability-Valence Interpretation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 12 (March), 418-431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuiper, N.A. and T.B. Rogers 1979, “Encoding of Personal Information: Self-Other Differences,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (4), 499-514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, Charles G. 1980, “Schemas and Images as Memory Aids: Two Modes of Processing Social Information,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38 (2), 257-269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacInnis, Deborah J. and Linda L. Price 1987, “The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (March), 473-491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nell, V. 1988. Lost in a Book: The Psychology of Reading for Pleasure. New Havent, CT: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nell, V. 2002, “Mythic Structures in Narrative: The Domestication of Immortality,” in Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations, ed. M.C. Green, J.J. Strange, and T.C. Brock, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 17-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo, 1981. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude and change. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, L. M. 1994, “Images in Advertising: The Need for Theory of Visual Rhetoric,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21,252-273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh, Anees A. and Charles Jordon 1983, “Clinical Uses of Mental Imagery,” in Imagery: Current Theory, Research and Application, ed. A.A. Sheikh, New York: Wiley, 391-435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Ruth Ann, Michael J. Houston, and Terry L. Childers 1984, “Verbal versus Visual Processing Modes: An Empirical Test of the Cyclical Processing Hypothesis,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11, ed. Thomas Kinnear, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 75-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Michael R. and L. Greenberg 1993, “Setting the Stage: Collective Selection in the Stylistic Context of Commercials,” Journal of Advertising, 22, 11-21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unnava, H. Rao and Robert E. Burnkrant 1991, “An Imagery-processing View of the Role of Pictures in Print Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (May), 226-231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Smith, S. (2017). The Power of Abstract Images in Advertising. In: Campbell, C.L. (eds) The Customer is NOT Always Right? Marketing Orientationsin a Dynamic Business World. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50008-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics