Abstract
Unrestricted access to scientific literature is considered essential for the pursuit and advancement of science. The issues related to restrictions imposed by the traditional subscription-based journal access model on free and unrestricted access to scientific information prompted the pursuit of alternative journal publishing models, and the open access (OA) movement was born. The OA publishing model is evolving, gaining support of the academic and research communities, research funders, policymakers, and even the traditional journal publishers. The discussion in this chapter covers the developments related to unrestricted access to scientific information, different OA publishing models, strengths, and issues related to two major models—Green (self-archiving) model and Gold (author-paid) model , concerns related to the quality of OA journals , and the emergence of predatory journals that abuse the author-paid OA model. In addition, the findings of studies that examine the impact of OA journals related to subscription-based journals are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In 2016, NIH’s research funding level remains only slightly higher than before sequestration, prior to FY 2013.
- 2.
(U.S. Const. Art. I, § 8)—The Congress shall have Power …. To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.
- 3.
Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies (ROARMAP) http://roarmap.eprints.org.
- 4.
Budapest OA Initiative http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/.
- 5.
Bethesda Statement on OA Publishing http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm.
- 6.
Berlin Declaration on OA to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities https://www.madrimasd.org/cienciaysociedad/documentos/doc/berlin_declaration.pdf.
- 7.
Journal Citation Report defines it as “the measures how frequently the average article from a journal is cited within the same year as publication”.
- 8.
The impact factor (IF) is a citation-based journal quality assessment measure; IF of a journal is calculated by adding up the number of citations in the current year of any items published in that journal in the previous 2 years and dividing by the total number of articles published in the same two years.
- 9.
Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative (HINARI)Â http://www.who.int/hinari/en/.
- 10.
Global Online Research in Agriculture (AGORA) Â http://agora-journals.fao.org/content/en/journals.php.
- 11.
Online Access to Research in the Environment (OARE)Â http://www.unep.org/oare/.
- 12.
Access to Research for Development and Innovation (ARDI)Â http://www.wipo.int/ardi/en/.
- 13.
Research4Life http://www.research4life.org/.
- 14.
Bioline International http://www.bioline.org.br/.
- 15.
- 16.
African Journals Online http://www.ajol.info/.
- 17.
Compact for Open Access Publishing Equity—http://www.oacompact.org/.
- 18.
Sponsoring Consortium for Open Access Publishing in Particle Physics—https://scoap3.org.
References
Antelman, K. (2004). Do open-access articles have a greater research impact? College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 372–382.
Arunachalam, S. (2003). Information for research in developing countries—Information technology, a friend or foe? The International Information & Library Review, 35(2–4), 133–147.
Bartholomew, R. E. (2014). Science for sale: The rise of predatory journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 107(10), 384–385.
Bartol, T. (2013). Information literacy and international capacity development initiatives in life sciences: AGORA, OARE, HINARI, ARDI (Research4Life-R4L). In Worldwide Commonalities and Challenges in Information Literacy Research and Practice (pp. 338–344). Berlin: Springer.
Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415), 179.
Bjork, B.-C. (2014). Open access subject repositories: An overview. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 698–706. doi:10.1002/asi.23021
Bjork, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2012). Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact. Bmc Medicine, 10.
Björk, B.-C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., & Guðnason, G. (2010). Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009. PLoS ONE, 5(6), e11273.
Björk, B.-C., Laakso, M., Welling, P., & Paetau, P. (2014). Anatomy of green open access. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(2), 237–250.
Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review? Science, 342, 60–65.
Bosch, S., & Henderson, K. (2014). Steps down the evolutionary road—Periodicals price survey 2014. Library Journal, 139(7), 32–37.
Bosch, S., Henderson, K., & Klusendorf, H. (2011). Periodicals price survey 2011: Under pressure, times are changing. Library Journal, 36(8), 30–34.
Butler, D. (1999). Publishing group offers peer review on PubMed Central. Nature, 402(6758), 110.
Calver, M. C., & Bradley, J. S. (2010). Patterns of citations of open access and non-open access conservation biology journal papers and book chapters. Conservation Biology, 24(3), 872–880.
Cox, J., & Cox, L. (2008). Scholarly publishing practice: Third Survey 2008. ALPSP: Brighton.
Craig, I. D., Plume, A. M., McVeigh, M. E., Pringle, J., & Amin, M. (2007). Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 239–248. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2007.04.001
Crawford, W. (2002). Free electronic refereed journals: Getting past the arc of enthusiasm. Learned Publishing, 15(2), 117–123.
Davis, P. M. (2010). Does open access lead to increased readership and citations? A randomized controlled trial of articles published in APS journals. The Physiologist, 53(6).
Davis, P. M. (2011). Open access, readership, citations: A randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. Faseb Journal, 25(7), 2129–2134. doi:10.1096/fj.11-183988
Davis, P. M., Lewenstein, B. V., Simon, D. H., Booth, J. G., & Connolly, M. J. L. (2008). Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: Randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 337(7665). doi:10.1136/bmj.a568
Davis, P. M., & Walters, W. H. (2011). The impact of free access to the scientific literature: A review of recent research. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 99(3), 208.
Evans, J. A., & Reimer, J. (2009). Open access and global participation in science. Science, 323(5917), 1025. doi:10.1126/science.1154562
Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e157.
Faber Frandsen, T. (2009). Attracted to open access journals: A bibliometric author analysis in the field of biology. Journal of documentation, 65(1), 58–82.
Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, T., et al. (2010). Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013636
Gaulé, P. (2009). Access to scientific literature in India. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2548–2553.
Giglia, E. (2010, June 16–18). The impact factor of open access journals: data and trends. Paper Presented at the 14th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Helsinki, Finland.
Gilbert, N. (2009, June 15). Editor will quit over hoax paper: computer-generated manuscript accepted for publication in open-access journal. Nature. doi:10.1038/news.2009.571
Ginsparg, P. (2004). Scholarly information architecture, 1989–2015. Data Science Journal, 3, 29–37.
Hadro, J. (2009). Five universities sign open access funding compact. Library Journal.
Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2006). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. arXiv preprint cs/0606079.
Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., et al. (2008). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access: An update. Serials Review, 34(1), 36–40.
Hedlund, T., Gustafsson, T., & Björk, B.-C. (2004). The open access scientific journal: An empirical study. Learned Publishing, 17(3), 199–209.
Henderson, K. S., & Bosch, S. (2010). Seeking the new normal: Periodicals price survey 2010. Library Journal, 135(7), 36–40.
Henneken, E. A., Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Thompson, D., et al. (2006). Effect of E-printing on citation rates in astronomy and physics. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 9, 2.
Kim, J. (2011). Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(3), 246–254.
Kolata, G. (2013 April 7). Scientific articles accepted (personal checks, too). The New York Times. Retrieved on Oct. 15, 2016Â from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/08/health/for-scientists-an-exploding-world-of-pseudo-academia.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Kurata, K., Morioka, T., Yokoi, K., & Matsubayashi, M. (2013). Remarkable growth of open access in the biomedical field: Analysis of PubMed articles from 2006 to 2010. PLoS One, 8(5), e60925.
Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Henneken, E., et al. (2005). The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1395–1402.
Kurtz, M. J., & Henneken, E. A. (2007). Open Access does not increase citations for research articles from The Astrophysical Journal. arXiv preprint arXiv:0709.0896
Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20961.
McCabe, M., & Snyder, C. M. (2014). Identifying the effect of open access on citations using a panel of science journals. Economic Inquiry, 52(4), 1284–1300.
McCabe, M. J., & Snyder, C. M. (2011). Did online access to journals change the economics literature. Social Science Research Network (SSRN), January, 23.
McVeigh, M. E. (2004). Open access journals in the ISI citation databases: analysis of impact factors and citation patterns: A citation study from Thomson Scientific. Thomson Scientific.
Metcalfe, T. S. (2005). The rise and citation impact of astro-ph in major journals. arXiv preprint astro-ph/0503519.
Metcalfe, T. S. (2006). The citation impact of digital preprint archives for solar physics papers. Solar Physics, 239(1–2), 549–553.
Miguel, S., Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Z., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2011). Open access and Scopus: A new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(6), 1130–1145.
Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of “open access” on citation impact: An analysis of ArXiv’s condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2047–2054.
Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., & Jamali, H. R. (2007). Open access in context: A user study. Journal of Documentation, 63(6), 853–878.
Oldenburg, H. (1673). Epistle dedicatory. Philosophical Transactions, 8(92–100).
Pickler, R., Noyes, J., Perry, L., Roe, B., Watson, R., & Hayter, M. (2014). Authors and readers beware the dark side of Open Access. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(10), 2221–2223. doi:10.1111/jan.12589
Shieber, S. M. (2009). Equity for open-access journal publishing. PLoS Biology, 7(8), e1000165.
Schwarz, G. J., & Kennicutt, R. C., Jr. (2004). Demographic and citation trends in astrophysical journal papers and preprints. Bulletin of American Astronomical Society, 36, 1654–1663.
Solomon, D. J., & Björk, B. C. (2012). A study of open access journals using article processing charges. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1485–1495.
Solomon, D. J., Laakso, M., & Björk, B.-C. (2013). A longitudinal comparison of citation rates and growth among open access journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 642–650.
Sotudeh, H., & Horri, A. (2007). Tracking open access journals evolution: Some considerations in open access data collection validation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(11), 1578–1585.
Suber, P. (2008). An open access mandate for the National Institutes of Health. Open Medicine, 2(2), e39–e41.
Van Orsdel, L. C., & Born, K. (2004). Periodicals price survey 2004: Closing in on open access. Library Journal, 129(7).
Van Orsdel, L. C., & Born, K. (2006). Periodicals price survey 2006: Journals in the time of Google. Library Journal, 131(7).
Van Orsdel, L. C., & Born, K. (2005). Periodicals price survey 2005: Choosing sides. Library Journal, 130(7).
Van Orsdel, L. C., & Born, K. (2007). Periodicals price survey 2007: Serial wars. Library Journal, 132(7).
Van Orsdel, L. C., & Born, K. (2008). Periodicals price survey 2008: Embracing openness. Library Journal, 134(7).
Van Orsdel, L. C., & Born, K. (2009). Periodicals price survey 2009: Reality bites. Library Journal, 135(7)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Silva, P.U.K., K. Vance, C. (2017). On the Road to Unrestricted Access to Scientific Information: The Open Access Movement. In: Scientific Scholarly Communication. Fascinating Life Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50627-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50627-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50626-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50627-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)