Skip to main content

How to Make Plausibility-Based Forecasting More Accurate

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robustness in Econometrics

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 692))

Abstract

In recent papers, a new plausibility-based forecasting method was proposed. While this method has been empirically successful, one of its steps—selecting a uniform probability distribution for the plausibility level—is heuristic. It is therefore desirable to check whether this selection is optimal or whether a modified selection would like to a more accurate forecast. In this paper, we show that the uniform distribution does not always lead to (asymptotically) optimal estimates, and we show how to modify the uniform-distribution step so that the resulting estimates become asymptotically optimal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdallah NB, Voyeneau NM, Denoeux T (2012) Combining statistical and expert evidence within the D-S framework: application to hydrological return level estimation. In: Denoeux T, Masson M-H (eds) Belief functions: theory and applications: proceedings of the 2nd international conference on belief functions, Compiègne, France, May 9–11, 2012. Springer, Berlin, pp 393–400

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abramovich F, Ritov Y (2013) Statistical theory: a concise introduction. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kanjanatarakul O, Sriboonchitta S, Denoeux T (2014) Forecasting using belief functions: an application to marketing econometrics. Int J Approx Reason 55:1113–1128

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Thianpaen N, Liu J, Sriboonchitta S Time series using AR-belief approach. Thai J Math 14(3):527–541

    Google Scholar 

  5. Martin, R (2015) Plausibility functions and exact frequentist inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 110:1552–1561

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the partial support of the Center of Excellence in Econometrics, Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. This work was also supported in part by the National Science Foundation grants HRD-0734825 and HRD-1242122 (Cyber-ShARE Center of Excellence) and DUE-0926721, and by an award “UTEP and Prudential Actuarial Science Academy and Pipeline Initiative” from Prudential Foundation.

The authors are greatly thankful to Hung T. Nguyen for valuable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladik Kreinovich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zhu, K., Thianpaen, N., Kreinovich, V. (2017). How to Make Plausibility-Based Forecasting More Accurate. In: Kreinovich, V., Sriboonchitta, S., Huynh, VN. (eds) Robustness in Econometrics. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 692. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50742-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50742-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50741-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50742-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics