Abstract
We offer a proof system and a NetLogo simulation for trust and distrust in networks where contradictory information is shared by ranked lazy and sceptic agents. Trust and its negative are defined as properties of edges: the former is required when a message is passed bottom-up in the hierarchy or received by a sceptic agent; the latter is attributed to channels that require contradiction resolution, or whose terminal is a lazy agent. These procedures are associated with epistemic costs, respectively for confirmation and refutation. We describe the logic, illustrate the algorithms implemented in the model and then focus on experimental results concerning the analysis of epistemic costs, the role of the agents’ epistemic attitude on distrust distribution and the influence of (dis)trust in reaching consensus.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carbone, M., Nielsen, M., Sassone, V.: A Formal Model for Trust in Dynamic Networks. In: A. Cerone, P. Lindsay (eds.) Int. Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods, SEFM 2003., pp. 54–61. IEEE Computer Society (2003). URL http://eprints.soton. ac.uk/262294/. A preliminary version appears as Technical Report BRICS RS-03-4, Aarhus University
Chakraborty, S., Ray, I.: TrustBAC: Integrating Trust Relationships into the RBAC Model for Access Control in Open Systems. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies, SACMAT ’06, pp. 49–58. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2006). DOI 10.1145/1133058.1133067. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1133058.1133067
Chandran, S.M., Joshi, J.B.D.: LoT-RBAC: A Location and Time-based RBAC Model. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, WISE’05, pp. 361–375. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005). DOI 10.1007/11581062 27. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11581062_27
Grandi, U., Lorini, E., Perrussel, L.: Propositional Opinion Diffusion. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS’15, pp. 989–997. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC (2015). URL http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2772879. 2773278
Granovetter, M.: Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology 83(6), 1420–1443 (1978)
Guha, R., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., Tomkins, A.: Propagation of Trust and Distrust. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’04, pp. 403–412. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2004). DOI 10.1145/988672.988727. URL http: //doi.acm.org/10.1145/988672.988727
Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulations. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5(3), 2002
Jøsang, A., Pope, S.: Semantic Constraints for Trust Transitivity. In: S. Hartmann, M. Stumptner (eds.) APCCM, CRPIT, vol. 43, pp. 59–68. Australian Computer Society (2005)
Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J.M., Tardos, E.: Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social networks. In: Proceedings of the 32nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (2005)
Lehrer, K., Wagner, C.: Rational Consensus in Science and Society. D. Reidel Publishing Company (1981)
Marsh, S., Dibben, M.: Trust, Untrust, Distrust and Mistrust – An Exploration of the Dark(er) Side. In: P. Herrmann, V. Issarny, S. Shiu (eds.) Trust Management, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3477, pp. 17–33. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2005). DOI 10.1007/11429760 2. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11429760_2
Massa, P., Avesani, P.: Controversial Users Demand Local Trust Metrics: An Experimental Study on Epinions.com Community. In: Proceedings, The Twentieth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Seventeenth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, July 9-13, 2005, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, pp. 121–126 (2005). URL http://www.aaai.org/Library/AAAI/2005/aaai05-020.php
McKnight, D.H., Chervany, N.L.: Trust and Distrust Definitions: One Bite at a Time. In: R. Falcone, M.P. Singh, Y. Tan (eds.) Trust in Cyber-societies, Integrating the Human and Artificial Perspectives, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2246, pp. 27–54. Springer (2000). DOI 10.1007/3-540-45547-7 3. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45547-7_3
Oleshchuk, V.A.: Trust-Aware RBAC. In: I.V. Kotenko, V.A. Skormin (eds.) MMM-ACNS, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7531, pp. 97–107. Springer (2012). URL http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/mmmacns/mmmacns2012.html#Oleshchuk12
Primiero, G.: A Calculus for Distrust and Mistrust. In: S.M. Habib, J. Vassileva, S. Mauw, M. M¨uhlh¨auser (eds.) Trust Management X - 10th IFIP WG 11.11 International Conference, IFIPTM 2016, Darmstadt, Germany, July 18-22, 2016, Proceedings, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol. 473, pp. 183–190. Springer (2016). DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-41354-9 15. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41354-9_15
Primiero, G., Raimondi, F.: A typed natural deduction calculus to reason about secure trust. In: A. Miri, U. Hengartner, N. Huang, A. Jøsang, J. Garc´ıa-Alfaro (eds.) 2014 Twelfth Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust, Toronto, ON, Canada, July 23-24, 2014, pp. 379–382. IEEE (2014). DOI 10.1109/PST.2014.6890963. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1109/PST.2014.6890963
Primiero, G., Tagliabue, J.: Quantifying epistemic trust in networks with contradictory information. Tech. rep. (2016)
Raghavan, U.N., Albert, R., Kumara, S.: Near linear time algorithm to detect community structures in large-scale networks. Physical Reviews E 76(3) (2007)
Wilensky, U.: NetLogo, Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University. Evanston, IL. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/ (1999)
Zicari, P., Interdonato, R., Perna, D., Tagarelli, A., Greco, S.: Controversy in Trust Networks. In: Procs. 9th Int. Conf. on Trust and Trustworthy Computing (TRUST), Vienna, Austria, August 29-30, 2016, pp. 82–100 (2016). DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45572-3 5
Ziegler, C.N., Lausen, G.: Propagation Models for Trust and Distrust in Social Networks. Information Systems Frontiers 7(4-5), 337–358 (2005). DOI 10.1007/s10796-005-4807-3. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-005-4807-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Primiero, G., Bottone, M., Raimondi, F., Tagliabue, J. (2017). Contradictory information flow in networks with trust and distrust. In: Cherifi, H., Gaito, S., Quattrociocchi, W., Sala, A. (eds) Complex Networks & Their Applications V. COMPLEX NETWORKS 2016 2016. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 693. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50900-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50901-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)