Abstract
In the last chapter we introduced the idea that, using the same approach followed in Chap. 3, one can define four-dimensional objects which are the counterparts of the 3D Euclidean scalars, vectors, and tensors in the Minkowski spacetime.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For example, from what has been previously shown, a relativistic compatible dynamics in Euclidean geometry is difficult to conceive and to understand.
- 2.
Which is exactly why we can tell that the particle is moving at the speed of light, because \(v=\left| \mathrm {d}\mathbf {x}/\mathrm {d}t\right| =c\).
- 3.
It is evident that in this case Eq. (6.1.1) does not hold even if \(\mathrm {d}t\) can still be defined.
- 4.
Or, which is the same, the velocity \(\mathbf {v}\) as measured in the rest frame \(\bar{S}\) of \(\varvec{w}\).
- 5.
We remind the reader that these equations had been derived in the case of \(\mathbf {v}=0\).
- 6.
The second equation can be obtained by the relation \(\left( \mathbf {a}\times \mathbf {b}\right) ^{2}=a^{2}b^{2}-\left( \mathbf {a}\cdot \mathbf {b}\right) ^{2}\), which allows us to rewrite Eq. (6.1.11) as
$$ \mathbf {a}\cdot \mathbf {a}=\gamma ^{6}\frac{\bar{v}^{2}\bar{a}^{2}-\left( \bar{\mathbf {v}}\times \bar{\mathbf {a}}\right) ^{2}}{c^{2}}+\gamma ^{4}\bar{a}^{2}. $$In fact, for \(\mathbf {a}_{\parallel }\) this becomes
$$ a_{\parallel }^{2}=\gamma ^{6}\frac{\bar{v}^{2}\bar{a}_{\parallel }^{2}}{c^{2}}+\gamma ^{4}\bar{a}_{\parallel }^{2}=\gamma ^{6}\bar{a}_{\parallel }^{2}\left( \frac{1}{\gamma ^{2}}+\frac{\bar{v}^{2}}{c^{2}}\right) =\gamma ^{6}\bar{a}_{\parallel }^{2}\left( 1-\frac{\bar{v}^{2}}{c^{2}}+\frac{\bar{v}^{2}}{c^{2}}\right) =\gamma ^{6}\bar{a}_{\parallel }^{2}.$$ - 7.
And therefore of an absolute concept of simultaneity among events.
- 8.
Or at least no one in agreement with the experimental data.
- 9.
For example, the definition of kinetic energy satisfies the basic requirement of coinciding with its classical definition when \(v\ll c\).
- 10.
To convince ourselves of this it is sufficient to notice that we can assign an energy \(E=h\nu \) to a photon with frequency \(\nu \) and to remember that the fact that light can exert a pressure is shown in many cases and at different levels, from small didactic experiments to objects the size of solar sails.
- 11.
The latter both because \(m=0\) and because for massless particles \(\mathrm {d}s^{2}=0\).
- 12.
Not to be confused with the Lagrangian of the variational approach.
- 13.
It is thus clear that the introduction of the einbein has introduced one more “coordinate” in the Lagrangian, which, however, is not a true dynamical coordinate because \(\partial L/\partial \dot{e}=0\). From this point of view, therefore, the function of the einbein is to show the local gauge freedom of the problem by writing a singular Lagrangian and making it possible to fix a specific gauge.
- 14.
We recall that L has to be a Lorentz scalar to guarantee the covariance of the resulting equations with respect to any transformation of the Poincaré group.
- 15.
One could equivalently say that \(-c^{2}\mathrm {d}\tau ^{2}=\mathrm {d}s^{2}=\eta _{\alpha \beta }\mathrm {d}x^{\alpha }\mathrm {d}x^{\beta }\) and therefore \(\mathrm {d}\tau =\sqrt{-\eta _{\alpha \beta }\dot{x}^{\alpha }\dot{x}^{\beta }/c^{2}}\,\mathrm {d}\tau \) so that \(\mathrm {d}\tau \) is actually a quantity related to the four-velocity of the particle.
- 16.
The aberration of a light was detected in the seventeenth century in the form of the so-called stellar aberration. The first explanation was given by Bradley in 1727, who derived the non relativistic equation of the light aberration.
- 17.
In considering the tangent, however, we are are introducing a sign ambiguity.
- 18.
As a further note, if the system is not only singular, but also \(\partial ^{2}L/\partial \dot{q}_{i}\partial \dot{q}_{j}=0\) for all i, j then it transforms to
$$ \frac{\partial ^{2}L}{\partial \dot{q}_{i}\partial q_{j}}\dot{q}_{j}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial q_{i}}-\frac{\partial ^{2}L}{\partial \dot{q}_{i}\partial \lambda } $$that in its turn can be solved only if
$$ \mathrm {det}\left( \frac{\partial ^{2}L}{\partial \dot{q}_{i}\partial q_{j}}\right) \ne 0. $$If \(\partial L/\partial \dot{q}_{j}=0\) for a specific j, then the coordinate \(q_{j}\) is said to be non propagating and the Lagrangian is non dynamic for that coordinate. A Lagrangian is simply non dynamic as a whole if the condition holds for all the \(q_{j}\).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vecchiato, A. (2017). Special Relativity in Minkowskian Spacetime. In: Variational Approach to Gravity Field Theories. Undergraduate Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51211-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51211-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51209-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51211-2
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)