Abstract
The European Union’s Birds and Habitats Directives and Marine Strategy Framework Directive demand that the proponent describes and assesses the potential cumulative effects on wildlife in environmental impact assessment reports for proposed actions. Based upon the DPSIR (Driving forces, Pressures, States, Impacts, Responses) approach (European Environment Agency 1999), a 6-step framework for undertaking a cumulative impacts assessment was developed to address this requirement:
-
1.
Identify the relevant pressures the envisaged activities could cause.
-
2.
Identify the habitats and species that may be affected by these pressures.
-
3.
Describe all other activities that could affect the same species.
-
4.
Describe the nature and scale of the cumulative effects of all the activities selected in Step 3 on the selected habitats and species.
-
5.
Evaluate the significance of the effects on the selected habitats and species.
-
6.
If necessary, adapt the activity by taking measures to prevent the activity from causing significant effects.
The first application of this approach was carried out for the initiative of the Dutch Social Economic Council, the Energy Agreement for Sustainable Growth (2013). The agreement proposed an offshore wind capacity of 4500 MW by 2030 for the Dutch part of the North Sea. The application of this cumulative impacts assessment framework showed that effective mitigation measures are required to achieve this agreement without endangering protected species and habitats, in line with European Union (EU) nature and environmental legislation. Mitigation measures can be implemented through conditions on permits for offshore wind farm projects, which include restrictions on the maximum underwater noise levels during construction, the minimum capacity of individual wind turbines, and measures to reduce bird and bat collisions and fatalities during seasons of major migration.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Information and basic reports at http://www.noordzeeloket.nl/en/functions-and-use/Maritime_wind_energy/ecology/.
- 2.
Since the available data on Harbour Porpoise densities and numbers in the North Sea are still considered insufficient, ASCOBANS has, for the time being, only established ‘interim’ objectives.
- 3.
References
Arends E, Jaspers Faijer M, van der Bilt S (2013) Passende Beoordeling Windpark Q4 west, Pondera Consult
ASCOBANS Secreatriat (1998) Progress report to the IWC on the agreement on the conservation of small cetaceans of the Baltic and North Seas (ASCOBANS), Oct 1997–May 1998
Band W (2000) Windfarms and birds: calculating a theoretical collision risk assuming no avoiding action. Guidance Notes Series, Scottish Natural Heritage
Band W (2012) Using a collision risk model to assess bird collision risks for offshore windfarms. SOSS, The Crown Estate, London, UK. Available via www.bto.org/science/wetland-and-marine/soss/projects. http://www.bto.org/sites/default/files/u28/downloads/Projects/Final_Report_SOSS02_Band1ModelGuidance.pdf
Band W, Madders M, Whitfield DP (2007) Developing field and analytical methods to assess avian collision risk at wind farms. In: de Lucas M, Janss GFE, Ferrer M (eds) Birds and wind farms: risk assessment and mitigation. Quercus, Madrid, pp 259–275
Bellebaum J, Wendeln H (2011) Identifying limits to wind farm-related mortality in migratory bird populations. In: Poster presented at the CWW conference, 2011 in Trondheim
Bellebaum J, Korner-Nievergelt F, Dürr T, Mammen U (2013) Wind turbine fatalities approach a level of concern in a raptor population. J Nat Conserv 21:394–400
Bradbury G, Trinder M, Furness B, Banks AN, Caldow RWG, Hume D (2014) Mapping seabird sensitivity to offshore wind farms. PLoS ONE 9(9):e106366. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106366
Dijkema KS, Dankers N, Wolff WJ (1985) Cumulatie van ecologische effecten in de Waddenzee. RIN-rapport 85/13. Rijksinstituut voor Natuurbeheer, Texel: 105
Dillingham P, Fletcher D (2008) Estimating the ability of birds to sustain additional human-caused mortalities using a simple decision rule and allometric relationships. Biol Conserv 141:1783–1792
European Environment Agency (1999) Environmental indicators: typology and overview. Technical report No 25/1999. Available via http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/TEC25
Hammond PS, MacLeod K, Berggren P, Borchers DL, Burt ML, Cañadas A, Desportes G, Donovan GP, Gilles A, Gillespie D, Gordon J, Hiby L, Kuklik I, Leaper R, Lehnert K, Leopold M, Lovell P, Øien N, Paxton CGM, Ridoux V, Rogan E, Samarra F, Scheidat M, Sequeira M, Siebert U, Skov H, Swift R, Tasker ML, Teilmann J, van Canneyt O, Vázquez JA (2013) Cetacean abundance and distribution in European Atlantic shelf waters to inform conservation and management. Biol Conserv 164:107–122
Harwood J, King S, Schick R, Donovan C, Booth C (2014) A protocol for implementing the interim population consequences of disturbance (PCOD) approach: quantifying and assessing the effects of UK offshore renewable energy developments on marine mammal populations. Report number SMRUL-TCE-2013–014. Scott Mar Freshw Sci 5(2)
Heinis F, de Jong CAF, RWS Werkgroep Onderwatergeluid (2015) Cumulatieve effecten van impulsief onderwatergeluid op zeezoogdieren. TNO-rapport, TNO 2015 R10335, Den Haag. Available via https://www.noordzeeloket.nl/en/Images/Frameworkfor%20assessing%20ecological%20and%20cumulative%20effects%20of%20offshore%20wind%20farms%20-%20Cumulative%20effects%20of%20impulsive%20underwater%20sound%20on%20marine%20mammals_4646.pdf
Lagerveld S, Jonge Poerink B, Verdaat H (2014) Monitoring bat activity in offshore wind farms OWEZ and PAWP in 2013. IMARES rapport C165/14
Lebreton JD (2005) Dynamical and statistical models for exploited populations. Aust N Z J Stat 47:49–63
Leopold MF, Boonman M, Collier MP, Davaasuren N, Fijn RC, Gyimesi A, de Jong J, Jongbloed RH, Jonge Poerink B, Kleyheeg-Hartman JC, Krijgsveld KL, Lagerveld S, Lensink R, Poot MJM, van der Wal JT, Scholl M (2014) A first approach to deal with cumulative effects on birds and bats of offshore wind farms and other human activities in the Southern North Sea. IMARES report C166/14. Available via https://www.noordzeeloket.nl/en/Images/Frameworkfor%20assessing%20ecological%20and%20cumulative%20effects%20of%20offshore%20wind%20farms%20-%20A%20first%20approach%20to%20deal%20with%20cumulative%20effects_4766.pdf
Leopold MF, Collier MP, Gyimesi A, Jongbloed RH, Poot MJM, van der Wal JT, Scholl M (2015) Iteration cycle: dealing with peaks in counts of birds following active fishing vessels when assessing cumulative effects of offshore wind farms and other human activities in the Southern North Sea. Additional note to IMARES report number C166/14
Milner-Gulland EJ, Akçakaya HR (2001) Sustainability indices for exploited populations under uncertainty. Trends Ecol Evol 16(12):686–692
National Research Council (2005) Marine mammal populations and ocean noise: determining when noise causes biologically significant effects. The National Academy Press, Washington D.C
Neo YY, Seitz J, Kastelein RA, Winter HV, Ten Cate C (2014) Temporal structure of sound affects behavioural recovery from noise impact in European seabass. Biol Conserv 178:65–73. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.012
Neo YY, Parie L, Bakker F, Snelderwaard P, Tudorache C, Schaaf M, Slabbekoorn H (2015) Behavioral changes in response to sound exposure and no spatial avoidance of noisy conditions in captive zebrafish. Front Behav Neurosci, 17 Feb 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00028
Niel C, Lebreton JD (2005) Using demographic invariants to detect overharvested bird populations from incomplete data. Conserv Biol 19:826–835
NOAA Fisheries (2014) Protected resources glossary. Available via http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/glossary.htm
Poot MJM, van Horssen PW, Collier MP, Lensink R, Dirksen S (2011) Effect studies offshore Wind Egmond aan Zee: cumulative effects on seabirds a modelling approach to estimate effects on population levels in seabirds. Bureau Waardenburg report nr: 11-026, OWEZ_R_212_T1_20111118_Cumulative effects
Richard Y, Abraham ER (2013) Application of potential biological removal methods to seabird populations. New Zealand Aquatic environment and biodiversity report no. 108. Ministry for Primary Industries
Scheidat M, Leaper R, van den Heuvel-Greve M, Winship A (2013) Setting maximum mortality limits for harbour porpoises in Dutch waters to achieve conservation objectives. Open J Mar Sci, vol 3. Available via http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojms
SEAMARCO (2013a) Hearing thresholds of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) for playbacks of multiple pile driving strike sounds. Report no. 2013-01
SEAMARCO (2013b) Behavioral responses of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) to playbacks of broadband pile driving sounds. Report no. 2013.04
SEAMARCO (2014) Hearing frequencies of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) temporarily affected by played back offshore pile driving sounds. Report no. 2014-05
SEAMARCO (2015a) Effect of pile driving sounds’ exposure duration on temporary hearing threshold shift in harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). Report no. 2015-09
SEAMARCO (2015b) Hearing thresholds of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) for narrow-band sweeps (0.125–150 kHz). Report no. 2015–02
SER-agreement (2013) Energy Agreement for sustainable growth: implementation of the energy agreement. Available via https://www.ser.nl/en/publications/publications/2013/energy-agreement-sustainable-growth.aspx
Southall BL, Bowles AE, Ellison WT, Finneran JJ, Gentry RL, Greene CR Jr, Kastak D, Ketten DR, Miller JH, Nachtigall PE, Richardson WJ, Thomas JA, Tyack PL (2007) Marine mammal noise exposure criteria: initial scientific recommendations. Aquatic Mamm 33(4):411–509
Sugimoto H, Matsuda H (2011) Collision risk of White-fronted Geese with wind turbines. Ornithological Sci 10:61–71
Tucker VA (1996) A mathematical model of bird collisions with wind turbine rotors. J SolEnergy Eng 118:253–262
van der Wal JT, Fijn R, Gyimesi A, Scholl M (2015) 2nd Iteration: effect of turbine capacity on collision numbers for three large gull species, based on revised density data, when assessing cumulative effects of offshore wind farms on birds in the southern North Sea. Additonal note to IMARES Report C166/14
Wade PR (1998) Calculating limits to the allowable human-caused mortality of Cetaceans and Pinnipeds. Mar Mamm Sci 14(1):1–37
Watts BD (2010) Wind and waterbirds: Establishing sustainanle mortality limits within the Atlantic Flyway. Center for conservation biology technical report series, CCBTR-10-05. College of William and Mary/Virginia Commonwealth University, Williamsburg
Acknowledgements
The framework tool presented in this paper, as well as its first application as described, has been made possible thanks to the dedicated work of the following persons and institutions: Mardik Leopold, Jan Tjalling van der Wal, Ruud Jongbloed, Michaela Scholl, Nara Davaasuren and Sander Lagerveld (all IMARES), Martin Poot, Ruben Fijn, Karen Krijgsveld, Mark Collier, Abel Gyimesi, Job de Jong and Martijn Boonman (all Bureau Waardenburg), Bob Jonge Poerink (The Fieldwork Company), Christ de Jong (TNO) and Floor Heinis (HWE). We want to express our gratitude to all of these professional researches as well as to Rob Gerits (Rijkswaterstaat) and Eeke Landman-Sinnema and Jeroen Vis (both ministry of Economic Affairs) for their keen interest in the matter of assessing cumulative effects of offshore windfarms.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Platteeuw, M. et al. (2017). A Framework for Assessing Ecological and Cumulative Effects (FAECE) of Offshore Wind Farms on Birds, Bats and Marine Mammals in the Southern North Sea. In: Köppel, J. (eds) Wind Energy and Wildlife Interactions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51272-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51272-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51270-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51272-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)