Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Tourism, Hospitality & Event Management ((THEM))

  • 577 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents the results of my field research, based on the tentative COCA framework developed in Chap. 5 and the reflective journey that I went through. The chapter is divided into five sections based on the COCA framework (see Fig. 5.1), which is divided into three parts: (a) Principal actors, (b) Technical aspects and (c) Core principles. Before looking at each of these, Sect. 7.2 discusses the relationship between the research team and ‘the researched’ (i.e. the community and the parent company), especially in terms of the perceptions and misconceptions of the different actors with regard to the role(s) of the research team. Section 7.3 describes how each step of the field research was implemented in practice and compares the theoretical approach with the actual circumstances encountered during the case study. Section 7.4 focuses entirely on Step 12: Reporting, and presents not only the output of the cursory analysis of organisational culture at the lodge but also proves that, due to the detail of the outcomes it produces, the COCA framework can be applied as an instrument to diagnose organisational and community cultures in the hospitality sector. Section 7.5 presents the implications of the core findings and explains why the lodge was unable to let its own dynamic organisational culture evolve. This conclusion refers to the fact that the parent company presented the ethnic cultures of the community as staged cultures by ignoring the undergoing permanent changes the villagers were embedded in. The final section, Conclusion, stresses that the findings have demonstrated that in the context of such ventures, an understanding of authenticity, cultural change, ownership and participation should be discussed and reflected by the involved actors in order to achieve a better ‘culture fit’ in the future. The field research has proven that COCA can be a supportive methodology in this regard.

“Research is where knowledge meets power”

(Hall, 2011, p. 49)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The headman presented during the research a brochure explaining the plan for a community-based project to include a sports ground, a homestay for tourists, a cultural centre, a herb garden and a meeting hall. The homestay programme involved plans to offer not only an overnight stay at a local house but also meals of traditional village food, elephant rides, rafting and trekking. To be able to implement this activity, the community needed 1.5 million baht (about US&46,000/ £31,000), which they tried to collect through donations at various Buddhist temples during important Buddhist festivals.

References

  • Aretz, H.-J., & Hansen, K. (2003). Erfolgreiches Management von Diversity: Die multikulturelle Organisation als Strategie zur Verbesserung einer nachhaltigen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, 17(1), 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aull Davies, C. (1999). Reflexive ethnography: A guide to researching selves and others. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berner, W. (2008). Cultural Due Diligence: Über die Unverträglichkeit von Unternehmenskulturen und ihre Gründe. OrganisatonsEntwicklung, 17(1), 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewerton, P. M., & Millward, L. (2008). Organizational research methods: A guide for students and researchers. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (2008). Understanding service organisations: 2008/2009: Level 1: Workbook. Leeds: Leslie Silver International Faculty, Tourism, Hospitality and Events School (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, C. (2007a). Participatory data analysis. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods: Connecting people, participation and place (pp. 181–187). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claiborne, P. (2010). Community participation in tourism development and the value of social capital: The case of Bastimentos, Bocas del Toro, Panamá. M.Sc. thesis, University of Gothenburg, School of Business, Economics and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E. (1996). Thai tourism: Hill tribes, islands and open-ended prostitution. Bangkok: White Lotus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. (2004). Shared benefits: Longitudinal research in eastern Indonesia. In J. Phillimore & L. Goodson (Eds.), Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies (pp. 292–310). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. R. (1995). Life in a Lisu village. Salisbury: Footloose.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, T. (1996). Learning to use RRA and PRA to improve the activities if [sic!] two land care groups in Australia. RRA Notes, 18, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. C. (2011). Fieldwork in tourism: Methods, issues and reflections. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, K. P. (2011). Kultur und Kulturwissenschaft (4th ed.). Tübingen: Francke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jobbins, G. (2004). Translators, trust and truth: Cross-cultural issues in sustainable tourism research. In J. Phillimore & L. Goodson (Eds.), Qualitative research in tourism: Ontologies, epistemologies and methodologies (pp. 311–323). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, H. (2005). Mien relations: Mountain people and state control in Thailand. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayat, K. (2002). Power, social exchanges and tourism in Langkawi: Rethinking resident perceptions. International Journal of Tourism Research, 4(3), 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutra, C. (2010). Rapid situation analysis: A hybrid, multi-methods, qualitative, participatory approach to researching tourism development phenomena. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(8), 1015–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krummacher, A. (2004). Der Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)-Ansatz aus ethnologischer Sicht: PRA—a quick and dirty ethnography? [Online]. Mainz: Institut für Ethnologie und Afrikastudien. Accessed February 1, 2015, from http://www.ifeas.uni-mainz.de/Dateien/Krummacher.pdf

  • Kyriakidou, O., & Gore, J. (2005). Learning by example: Benchmarking organizational culture in hospitality, tourism and leisure SMEs. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 12(3), 192–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. B. (2003). A spy, a shill, a go-between, or a sociologist: Unveiling the ‘observer’ in ‘participant observer’. Qualitative Research, 3(3), 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platz, R. (2000). Persistenz und Wandel ethnischer Identität: Die Bedeutung der Migration am Beispiel von Lisu und Karen in Nordthailand. Bonn: Holos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje, S. (2004). Unternehmenskultur als Interkultur: Entwicklung und Gestaltung interkultureller Unternehmenskultur am Beispiel deutscher Unternehmen in Thailand. Sternenfels: Wissenschaft and Praxis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santasombat, Y. (2006). Peasants, ethnicity, and the politics of location in Thailand. In L. Romanucci-Ross, G. A. De Vos, & T. Tsuda (Eds.), Ethnic identity: Problems and prospects for the twenty-first century (pp. 239–263). Lanham: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suansri, P. (2003). Community-based tourism handbook. Bangkok: Responsible Ecological Social Tours.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sülzer, R., & Zimmermann, A. (1996). Organisieren und Organisationen verstehen: Wege der internationalen Zusammenarbeit. Opladen: Westdeutscher.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Webber, L. W., & Ison, R. L. (1995). Participatory rural appraisal design: Conceptual and process issues. Agricultural Systems, 47(1), 107–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Häusler, N. (2017). Results. In: Cultural Due Diligence in Hospitality Ventures. Tourism, Hospitality & Event Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51337-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics