Skip to main content

Non-Cartesian Dualism and Meso-relational Media

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Physics of the Human Mind

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

  • 1587 Accesses

Abstract

In Chap. 1 (Sect. 1.7) I have introduced the concept of effective dualism as a useful approach to developing mathematical models of human behavior. Within this approach the human person is considered to be composed of two complementary components, objective and subjective ones, which possess their own properties and are governed by their own laws. It is essential that these properties and laws belong to a macrolevel description regarding human individuals as whole entities. Thereby any question about how the objective and subjective components are related to each other at physiological, biochemical, or even deeper levels is beyond the scope of this approach. So a reader may pose a question as to whether the effective dualism is something more than a merely epistemological approach introduced for the sake of convenience. The main goal of this chapter is to ague for the existence of a certain ontological ground of effective dualism. In particular, in this chapter we discuss fundamental reasons for considering the objective and subjective components ontologically irreducible to each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Zoroastrianism is the ancient pre-Islamic religion of Iran. In India this religion known under the name Parsiism appeared due to the descendants of Zoroastrian Iranian (Persian) immigrants. Founded by the Iranian prophet and reformer Zoroaster in the sixth century BC, Zoroastrianism contains both monotheistic and dualistic features. It influenced the other major Western religions—Judaism, Christianity, and Islam (Duchesne-Guillemin 2015).

  2. 2.

    The religious groups conventionally classified as gnostic did not belong to a single movement, they could differ remarkably in organization, teachings, and rituals; their common feature is a mythology that distinguishes between an inferior creator of the world (a demiurge) and a more transcendent god (e.g., Williams 2015).

  3. 3.

    A reader may raise an objection to the counter-intuitiveness argument just appealing to the history of physics. In the beginning, quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity also made assertions seemed to be counter-intuitive at that time. Responding to this argument let us note that quantum mechanics and the theory of relativity were developed when physicists started to deal with phenomena arising on atomic or astronomic scales, respectively, and people just had no relevant experience. As far as human mind is concerned, the situation is just opposite, at least, at the beginning of the last century there appeared several academic disciplines devoted to mental and cognitive activity of human beings in addition to the Western philosophy of mind with its long-term traditions of secular investigations.

  4. 4.

    Aquinas assumes that all the living beings except for humans possess only material souls (forms).

  5. 5.

    Heraclitus (c. 535–c. 475 BC), a pre-Socratic Greek philosopher, is often cited as the father of process philosophy whose view was shared in part by Plato and Aristotle.

  6. 6.

    There is another point of view proposed by Melnyk where the concept of supervenience as extrinsic to the physical language is replaced by the idea that every token event or phenomenon is either itself physical or a physically realized token of a functional type. A reader interested in the corresponding version of “retentive realization physicalism” may be referred to monograph by Melnyk (2003).

  7. 7.

    The role of the analysis-synthesis strategy in the context of emergence has been discussed previously, here I return to it again in order to elucidate the basic premises of my version of dualism.

References

  • Baker, G., Morris, K.J.: Descartes’ Dualism. Routledge, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, L.R.: Review: Andrea Lavazza and Howard Robinson (eds.) Contemporary Dualism: A Defense. Routledge, New York (2014). Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. 17 Oct 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, U.: Dualism, Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, Chicago (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard, M.H.: A process model of the emergence of representation. In: Farre, G.L., Oksala, T. (eds.) Emergence, Complexity, Hierarchy, Organization, Selected and Edited Papers from the ECHO III Conference, No. 91, 3–7 Aug. Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Mathematics, Computing and Management in Engineering Series. Espoo, Finland, pp. 263–270 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard, M.H.: Systems and process metaphysics. In: Hooker, C. (ed.) Handbook of the Philosophy of Science (Volume 10): Philosophy of Complex Systems. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J.W., Donald, A.: Is zoroastrianism dualistic or monotheistic? J. Am. Acad. Relig. XLVII (4), 557–588 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddon-Mitchell, D., Jackson, F.: Philosophy of Mind and Cognition: An Introduction, 2nd edn. Blackwell Publising, Malden (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckareff, A.A.: E. J. Lowe, personal agency: the metaphysics of mind and action, book reveiw. Philos. Rev. 30 (4), 272–275 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J.E.: Volition and physical laws. J. Conscious. Stud. 6 (10), 27–47 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Calef, S.: Dualism and mind. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2005). http://www.iep.utm.edu. Access on 16 Feb 2016

  • Campbell, R.: A process-based model for an interactive ontology. Synthese 166 (3), 453–477 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R.J., Bickhard, M.H.: Physicalism, emergence and downward causation. Axiomathes 21 (1), 33–56 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D.J.: The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D.J.: The Character of Consciousness. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N.: Language and nature. Mind 104 (413), 1–61 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R., Capes, J.: Incompatibilist (Nondeterministic) theories of free will. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2015 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, T., Mellor, D.H.: There is no question of physicalism. Mind XCIX (99) (394), 185–206 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C.F., Bechtel, W.: Top-down causation without top-down causes. Biol. Philos. 22 (4), 547–563 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, P.D.: Hume as dualist and anti-dualist. Hume Stud. 21 (XXI) (1), 47–55 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: Mental events. In: Foster, L., Swanson, J.W. (eds.) Experience and Theory, pp. 79–101. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst. Papers originally presented at a public lecture series held at the University of Massachusetts during the academic year 1968–1969 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: Essays on Actions and Events: Philosophical Essays, vol. 1, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P., Gribbin, J.: The Matter Myth: Dramatic Discoveries That Challenge Our Understanding of Physical Reality. Simon and Schuster, New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C.: Consciousness Explained. Back Bay Books/Little, Brown and Company, Boston (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne-Guillemin, J.: Zoroastrianism. Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, Chicago (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J.C.: How the SELF Controls Its BRAIN. Springer, Berlin (1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, H.: The “Mental” and the “Physical”: The Essay and a Postscript. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flage, D.E.: Hume’s dualism. Noûs 16 (4), 527–541 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A.: Special sciences (Or: the disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese 28 (2), 97–115 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, P.: The identity of indiscernibles. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2012 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasker, W.: The Emergent Self. Cornell University Press, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasker, W.: The dialectic of soul and body. In: Lavazza, A., Robinson, H. (eds.) Contemporary Dualism: A Defense, pp. 204–219. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, G.: The Routledge Guidebook to Descartes’ Meditations. Routledge, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, G.: René Descartes. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2015 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F.: From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, T.E., Cranston, M.: Hume, David. Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, Chicago (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.: Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993a)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.: Physicalism, or Something Near Enough. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kistler, M.: Mechanisms and downward causation. Philos. Psychol. 22 (5), 595–609 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Klose, J.: Process ontology from whitehead to quantum physics. In: Atmanspacher, H., Primas, H. (eds.) Recasting Reality: Wolfgang Pauli’s Philosophical Ideas and Contemporary Science, pp. 151–170. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kulstad, M., Carlin, L.: Leibniz’s philosophy of mind. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2013 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Larmer, R.: Mind-body interaction and the conservation of energy. Int. Philos. Quart. 26 (3), 277–285 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.: Occasionalism. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2014 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: Reduction of mind. In: Guttenplan, S. (ed.) A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, pp. 412–431. Blackwell Publishers Ltd., Oxford/Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewer, B.: From physics to physicalism. In: Gillett, C., Loewer, B. (eds.) Physicalism and Its Discontents, pp. 37–56. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.J.: Subjects of Experience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.J.: Non-Cartesian dualism. In: Heil, J. (ed.) Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology, pp. 851–865. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.J.: Personal Agency: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.J.: Dualism. In: Beckermann, A., McLaughlin, B.P., Walter, S. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind, pp. 66–84. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.J.: Dualism (Property dualism, substance dualism). In: Binder, M.D., Hirorawa, N., Windhorst, U. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, pp. 1018–1021. Springer-Verlag GmbH, Berlin (2009b)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.J.: Substance dualism: a non-Cartesian approach. In: Koons, R.C., Bealer, G. (eds.) The Waning of Materialism, pp. 439–461. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.J.: Why my body is not me: the unity argument for emergentist self-body dualism. In: Lavazza, A., Robinson, H. (eds.) Contemporary Dualism: A Defence, chapter 14, pp. 245–265. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, K.: The mind–body problem: an overview. In: Stich, S.P., Warfield, T.A. (eds.) The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind, pp. 1–46. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Malden (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W.G.: Philosophy of mind. In: Bunnin, N., Tsui-James, E.P. (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, 2nd edn., pp. 173–201. Blackwell Publishers Ltd., Oxford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Machamer, P., di Poppa, F.: Dualism. In: Horowitz, M.C. (ed.) New Dictionary of the History of Ideas, vol. 2, pp. 605–606. Thomson Gale, Detroit (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Malandra, W.W.: Zoroastrianism I. Historical Review up to the Arab Conquest, Encyclopædia Iranica, online edition, 2015 edn. (2005). Accessed 24 Feb 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • McInerny, R., O’Callaghan, J.: Saint Thomas Aquinas. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2015 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, M., Coates, D.J.: Compatibilism. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2015 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P., Sellars, W.S.: The concept of emergence. In: Feigl, H., Scriven, M. (eds.) The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 1, pp. 239–252. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk, A.: A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern Materialism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mesle, C.R.: Process-Relational Philosophy: An Introduction to Alfred North Whitehead. Templeton Foundation Press, West Conshohocken (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, E.: Interactionism and overdetermination. Am. Philos. Q. 33 (1), 105–117 (1996)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mind: Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, Chicago (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrhoff, U.: Interactionism, energy conservation, and the violation of physical laws. Phys. Essays 10 (4), 651–665 (1997)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mohrhoff, U.: The physics of interactionism. J. Conscious. Stud. 6 (8–9), 165–184 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero, B.: Physicalism. In: Garvey, J. (ed.) The Continuum Companion to Philosophy of Mind, pp. 92–101. Continuum International Publishing Group, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, J.P., Rae, S.B.: Body & Soul: Human Nature & the Crisis in Ethics. InterVarsity Press, Madison (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, J.P., Wallace, S.: Aquinas versus Locke and descartes on the human person and end-of-life ethics. Int. Philos. Q. 35 (3), 319–330 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, N.C.: Introduction and overview. In: Murphy, N.C., Ellis, G.F.R., O’Connor, T. (eds.) Downward Causation and the Neurobiology of Free Will, pp. 1–28. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nida-Rümelin, M.: An argument from transtemporal identity for subject–body dualism. In: Koons, R.C., Bealer, G. (eds.) The Waning of Materialism, pp. 191–211. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Briena, L.: Book reviews: Lowe, E. J., personal agency: the metaphysics of mind and action. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008). Australas. J. Philos. 89 (1), 172–174 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, T.: Free will. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2014 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E.T.: What Are We? A Study in Personal Ontology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, E.T.: Personal identity. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2010 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D.: Personal identity. Philos. Rev. 80 (1), 3–27 (1971) Reprinted in Reasons and Persons. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pétrement, S.: Dualism in philosophy and religion. In: Wiener, P.P. (ed.) Dictionary of the History of Ideas: Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas, vol. II, pp. 38–44. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K., Eccles, J.C.: The Self and Its Brain, 2nd edn., Springer, Berlin (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N.: Process Philosophy: A Survey of Basic Issues. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H.: Dualism. In: Stich, S.P., Warfield, T.A. (eds.) The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind, pp. 85–101. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Malden (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H.: Dualism. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2012 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H.: Naturalism and the unavoidability of the cartesian perspective. In: Lavazza, A., Robinson, H. (eds.) Contemporary Dualism: A Defense, pp. 154–170. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2014a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, H.: Substance. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2014 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2014b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W.: Epiphenomenalism. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2015 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, G.A.J.: Locke, John, Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, Chicago (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, P.: Hume on free will. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2014 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, G.C.: Upward and downward causation from a relational-horizontal ontological perspective. Axiomathes 25 (1), 23–40 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S.: Why property dualists must reject substance physicalism. Philos. Stud. 157 (1), 61–76 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S.: Non-reductive physicalism and the mind problem. Noûs 47 (1), 135–153 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R.: Why I am not a property dualist. J. Conscious. Stud. 9 (12), 57–64 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, J.: Formal process ontology. In: Guarino, N., Smith, B., Welty, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems-Volume 2001, pp. 333–345. ACM, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, J.: Forms of emergent interaction in general process theory. Synthese 166 (3), 479–512 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibt, J.: Process philosophy. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2013 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shein, N.: Spinoza’s theory of attributes. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2013 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrington, S.C.: Man on His Nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S.: Identity, Cause, and Mind: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge University Press, New York (1984). Expanded Edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S.: Personal Identity. Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skirry, J.: Descartes and the Metaphysics of Human Nature. Continuum International Publishing Group, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrbina, D.: Panpsychism in the West. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrbina, D.: Dualism, dual-aspectism, and the mind. In: Lavazza, A., Robinson, H. (eds.) Contemporary Dualism: A Defense, pp. 220–244. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J.J.C.: The content of physicalism. Philos. Q. 28 (113), 339–341 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J.J.C.: Materialism, Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, Chicago (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoljar, D.: Physicalism. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2015 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, S.: Weakness of will. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2014 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubenberg, L.: Neutral monism. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2014 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, E.: Aquinas. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, R.: The Evolution of the Soul, revised edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, R.: What makes me me? A defense of substance dualism. In: Lavazza, A., Robinson, H. (eds.) Contemporary Dualism: A Defense, pp. 139–153. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Swingburne, R.: Mind, Brain, & Free Will. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzgalis, W.: John Locke. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2016 edn. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Stanford (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R.C.: On what we must think. In: Lavazza, A., Robinson, H. (eds.) Contemporary Dualism: A Defense, pp. 171–187. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, S.: Epiphenomenalism. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2007). Online; accessed 16 Aug 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, S.: Dreams of a Final Theory: The Scientist’s Search for the Ultimate Laws of Nature, Vintage Books. A Division of RAndom House, Inc., New York (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N.: Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. The Free Press, A Division of Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York (1929/1978). Corrected Edition, Griffin, D.R., Sherburne, D.W. (eds.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, W.J.: An introduction to relational ontology. In: Polkinghorne, J. (ed.) The Trinity and an Entangled World: Relationality in Physical Science and Theology, pp. 55–73. Wm B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M.: Gnosticism. Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite, Chicago (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D.L.: Mind-brain interaction and violation of physical laws. J. Conscious. Stud. 6 (8–9), 185–200 (1999)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lubashevsky, I. (2017). Non-Cartesian Dualism and Meso-relational Media. In: Physics of the Human Mind. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51706-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics