Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of ‘Tidal Volume Challenge’ to Improve the Reliability of Pulse Pressure Variation

  • Chapter
Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2017

Part of the book series: Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine ((AUICEM))

  • 1941 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Michard F, Teboul JL (2002) Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 121:2000–2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murakawa K, Kobayashi A (1998) Effects of vasopressors on renal tissue gas tensions during hemorrhagic shock in dogs. Crit Care Med 16:789–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pinsky MR, Brophy P, Padilla J, Paganini E, Pannu N (2008) Fluid and volume monitoring. Int J Artif Organs 31:111–126

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR et al (2006) Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 354:2564–2575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Acheampong A, Vincent JL (2015) A positive fluid balance is an independent prognostic factor in patients with sepsis. Crit Care 19:251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D et al (2000) Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:134–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A (2009) Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 37:2642–2647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Perel A, Pizov R, Cotev S (2014) Respiratory variations in the arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation reflect volume status and fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 40:798–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong JQ, He HF, Chen ZY et al (2014) Comparison of stroke volume variation with pulse pressure variation as a diagnostic indicator of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Saudi Med J 35:261–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang X, Du B (2014) Does pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients: a critical review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 18:650

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Michard F, Teboul JL (2000) Using heart lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 4:282–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Morgan BC, Martin WE, Hornbein TF, Crawford EW, Guntheroth WG (1966) Hemodynamic effects of intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Anesthesiology 27:584–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jardin F, Delorme G, Hardy A, Auvert B, Beauchet A, Bourdarias JP (1990) Reevaluation of hemodynamic consequences of positive pressure ventilation: emphasis on cyclic right ventricular afterloading by mechanical lung inflation. Anesthesiology 72:966–970

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Permutt S, Wise RA, Brower RG (1989) How changes in pleural and alveolar pressure cause changes in afterload and preload. In: Scharf SM, Cassidy SS (eds) Heart-Lung Interactions in Health and Disease. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 243–250

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jardin F, Farcot JC, Gueret P, Prost JF, Ozier Y, Bourdarias JP (1983) Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support. Circulation 68:266–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scharf SM, Brown R, Saunders N, Green LH (1980) Hemodynamic effects of positive-pressure inflation. J Appl Physiol 49:124–131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M et al (2001) Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 92:984–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahjoub Y, Lejeune V, Muller L et al (2014) Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point prevalence study. Br J Anaesth 112:681–685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fischer MO, Mahjoub Y, Boisselier C et al (2015) Arterial pulse pressure variation suitability in critical care: A French national survey. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 34:23–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Benes J, Zatloukal J, Kletecka J, Simanova A, Haidingerova L, Pradl R (2013) Respiratory induced dynamic variations of stroke volume and its surrogates as predictors of fluid responsiveness: applicability in the early stages of specific critical states. J Clin Monit Comput 28:225–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Monnet X, Marik P, Teboul JL (2016) Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 42:1935–1947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Monnet X, Teboul JL (2008) Passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med 34:659–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Monnet X, Teboul JL (2015) Passive leg raising: five rules, not a drop of fluid! Crit Care 19:18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Monnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, Lamia B, Richard C, Teboul JL (2009) Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 37:951–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Monnet X, Bleibtreu A, Ferré A et al (2012) Passive leg-raising and end-expiratory occlusion tests perform better than pulse pressure variation in patients with low respiratory system compliance. Crit Care Med 40:152–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Silva S, Jozwiak M, Teboul JL, Persichini R, Richard C, Monnet X (2013) End-expiratory occlusion test predicts preload responsiveness independently of positive end-expiratory pressure during acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 41:1692–1701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Guerin L, Monnet X, Teboul JL (2013) Monitoring volume and fluid responsiveness: From static to dynamic indicators. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 27:177–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. De Backer D, Pinsky MR (2007) Can one predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients? Intensive Care Med 33:1111–1113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Muller L, Toumi M, Bousquet PJ et al (2011) An increase in aortic blood flow after an infusion of 100 ml colloid over 1 minute can predict fluid responsiveness: the mini-fluid challenge study. Anesthesiology 115:541–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, Teboul JL (2004) The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med 30:1834–1837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A et al (2004) Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 30:1734–1739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Michard F, Chemla D, Teboul JL (2015) Applicability of pulse pressure variation: how many shades of grey? Crit Care 19:144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent J (2005) Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 31:517–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vallée F, Richard JC, Mari A et al (2009) Pulse pressure variations adjusted by alveolar driving pressure to assess fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 35:1004–1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lakhal K, Ehrmann S, Benzekri-Lefèvre D et al (2011) Respiratory pulse pressure variation fails to predict fluid responsiveness in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 15:R85

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lansdorp B, Lemson J, vanPutten MJ, de Keijzer A, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P (2012) Dynamic indices do not predict volume responsiveness in routine clinical practice. Br J Anaesth 108:395–401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Reuter DA, Bayerlein J, Goepfert MS et al (2003) Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 29:476–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Teboul JL, Monnet X (2013) Pulse pressure variation and ARDS. Minerva Anestesiol 79:398–407

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Pinsky MR (2004) Using ventilation-induced aortic pressure and flow variation to diagnose preload responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 30:1008–1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Freitas FG, Bafi AT, Nascente AP et al (2013) Predictive value of pulse pressure variation for fluid responsiveness in septic patients using lung-protective ventilation strategies. Br J Anaesth 110:402–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA et al (2012) Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. JAMA 308:1651–1659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Futier E, Pereira B, Jaber S (2013) Intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation. N Engl J Med 369:1862–1863

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer C et al (2011) Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a “gray zone” approach. Anesthesiology 115:231–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Biais M, Ehrmann S, Mari A et al (2014) Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach. Crit Care 18:587

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Myatra SN, Prabu NR, Divatia JV, Monnet X, Kulkarni AP, Teboul JL (2016) The changes in pulse pressure variation or stroke volume variation after a “tidal volume challenge” reliably predict fluid responsiveness during low tidal volume ventilation. Crit Care Med. doi:10.1097/CCM0000000000002183

  46. Teboul JL, Pinsky MR, Mercat A et al (2000) Estimating cardiac filling pressure in mechanically ventilated patients with hyperinflation. Crit Care Med 28:3631–3636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

    S. N. Myatra

  2. Service de Réanimation Médicale, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Hôpital de Bicêtre, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

    X. Monnet & J.-L. Teboul

Authors
  1. S. N. Myatra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. X. Monnet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J.-L. Teboul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J.-L. Teboul .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Intensive Care Erasme Hospital, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

    Jean-Louis Vincent

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Myatra, S.N., Monnet, X., Teboul, JL. (2017). Use of ‘Tidal Volume Challenge’ to Improve the Reliability of Pulse Pressure Variation. In: Vincent, JL. (eds) Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2017. Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51908-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51908-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51907-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51908-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation