Skip to main content

Materialization of Knowledge Transfer, Strategy, Dynamic Environment and Sustainable Balance Scorecard Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emerging Economy MNEs
  • 520 Accesses

Abstract

The chapter presents the materialization of knowledge transfer, strategy, dynamic environment and sustainable balanced scorecard performance. Focusing on the definition, description and the analysis of each concept, the respective numerical figures in the given tables disclose the mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, t-value which explains the significant differences and p-value which explains the level of significance. It explores the modes of knowledge transfer practiced by the Emerging, Multinational Enterprises (MNEs), the strategies adopted, the dynamic business environment and the sustainable performance adopted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2006). Strategy Content and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Analysis. Public Administration Review, 52–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate Strategy: An Analytical Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, I., & McDonnell, E. (1990). Implanting Strategic Management (2nd Ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Interactive Framework and Review of Emerging Themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakir, A., & Todorovic, M. (2010). A Hermenutic Reading into ‘What Strategy Is’: Ambiguous Means-End Relationship. The Qualitative Report, 15(5), 1037–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banhan, H. C. (2011). External Environment Analysis for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Journal of Business and Economic Research, 8(10), 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firms Resources and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 1(17), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeouis III, L. J. (1980). Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Intergration. The Academy of Management Review, 5(1), 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracker, J. (1980). History Development of the Strtegic Management Concept. Academy of Management Concept, 5(2), 219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. (1962). Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. (2003). Knowledge Sharing: A Review of the Literature. World Bank Operations Evaluation Department, 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L. (2000). Organizational Theory and Design (7 Ed.). Thompson Learning, USA: South Western College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1954). The Practice of Management. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckl, V. C. (2012). Barriers of Knowledge Transfer. DRUID 2012. June 19–21. Capenhagen: DRUID Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figge, F., Hanh, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – Linking Sustainability Management to Business Strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11, 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Towards a Knowledge Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue: Knowledgeand the Firm), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge Flows within Multinational Corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), pp. 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohnen, P. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: An Implementation Guide for Business (pp. 1–115). Edited by Jason Potts. Manitoba, Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, G. (2009). Measuring Organizational Performance Beyond the Tripple Bottom Line. Business Strategy and Environment, 19, 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. T., & Kaplan, R. S. (1987). Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard – Measures That Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). Transforming Balanced Scorecard From Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part 1. Accounting Horizons, 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L., Geng, X., & Whinston, A. B. (2005). A Sender Receiver Framework for Knowledge Transfer. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machuki, V. N. (2011). External Environment Startegy Co-Alignment, Firm Level Institutions and Performance of Publicly Quoted Companies in Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya: Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Sutton, R. I. (1997). Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable. Organizational Science, 8(6), 698–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauri, A., & Michaels, M. (1998). Firm and Industry Effects Within Strategic Management: An Empirical Examination. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mircea, M. (2008). Strategy for Selecting a Business Strategy Solution. Informartica Economica, 1(45), 103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, V., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour (2nd, Ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organizational Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Krogh, G. V. (2009). Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Organization Science, 20 (3), 635–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge – Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the Bottom of Tripple Bottom Line. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyarko, F. (2009). The Prospects of Knowledge Creation – Laures SIDlabs. Laurea Lepavaara, Finland. Unpublished Thesis, Business Management, Laurea University of Applied Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 11(5), 538–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce II, J. A., & Robinsin Jr, R. B. (2005). Strategic Management: Formulation, Implementation and Control (9th Ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). Tacit Dimension. London: The University of Chicago Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1969). Knowing and Being. London: The University of Chicago Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, R., & Wade, D. (2001). Corporate Performance Management: How to Build a Better Organization Through Measurement Driven Strategies Alignment. Butterworth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serfontein, S. (2006). Organizational Transformation: A Quantum Leap from the Tradition to Entrepreneurial. Published Doctoral Thesis (pp. 48–68). Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (2003). The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkantraman, N., & Ramanujan, V. (1986). Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison Of Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, I., & Britton, C. (2009). The Business Environment (6th, Ed.). England: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and Speed of Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test. Organizational Science, 6(1), 76–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ogendo, J.L. (2017). Materialization of Knowledge Transfer, Strategy, Dynamic Environment and Sustainable Balance Scorecard Performance. In: Emerging Economy MNEs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52036-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics