Skip to main content

Leipzig’s Visual Artists as Actors of Urban Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Impact of Artists on Contemporary Urban Development in Europe

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 123))

Abstract

This chapter looks at the role of visual artists in urban change in Leipzig through the study of artists’ livelihoods and their engagement with the city in form of urban pioneering and professional development. Visual artists are actors of urban change in Leipzig because they share a sense of place attachment and common identity with the city. This leads to the attraction and retention of artists who are expanding and diversifying the existing cultural economy. Visual artists along with their exhibition and house projects have visible impact on the re-urbanisation of the city and the gentrification of specific neighbourhoods. This dynamic is strongly linked with urban shrinkage that Leipzig experienced after German reunification, which provided the experimental space and opportunity for a diversity of artistic livelihoods to emerge. However, currently the city is experiencing population growth due to its affordability and mythicised urban identity. Leipzig is renowned for its active visual arts scene embodied in the New Leipzig School movement and the renowned Leipzig Academy of Visual Arts, which is an incubator for artistic skill and talent. Previous research on the city’s attractiveness to cultural workers has identified strong personal networks, the diverse cultural offer and affordability of space as core factors for talent attraction and retention. Through qualitative methods, this research articulates causation, tensions and contradictions that describe the livelihoods of visual artists (including art students) within a complex urban setting that allows for positioning between artistic autonomy and commercial artistic practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term ‘cultural workers’ as used in this essay refers to professionals in the CCIs as an occupational group which includes artists.

  2. 2.

    These houses are referred to as ‘Gründerzeithäuser’ (founding epoch houses) representing housing stock built during the industrialisation period in Germany and Austria before the stock market crash in 1873.

  3. 3.

    The New Leipzig School relates to the post-reunification climate of modern Germany and is closely linked with the ‘Hochschule für Grafik und Buchkunst Leipzig’. On grounds of its conceptual vagueness and imprecision mostly linked to a representational style of painting, most of the artists associated with it reject the classification as member. However, it is widely used as a label and marketing tool in the world of art dealership.

References

  • Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., & Szelényi, I. (2008). Cities after socialism: Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies. London and Cambridge MA: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M., Lovatt, A., O’Connor, J., & Raffo, C. (2000). Risk and trust in the cultural industries. Geoforum, 31(4), 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernet, T. (2011). Bunte Grauzone: Eine Ethnographie lokaler Akteure der Stadtentwicklung in Leipzig-Lindenau. Lizenziatsarbeit der Philosophischen (Fakultät ed.). Zurich: Universität Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bismarck, B. V., & Koch, A. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond education. Kunst, Ausbildung, Arbeit und Ökonomie, Leipzig: Revolver-Archiv für aktuelle Kunst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontje, M. (2005). Facing the challenge of shrinking cities in East Germany: The case of Leipzig. GeoJournal, 61(1), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundschuh, A. (2010). Gentrification in ostdeutschen Städten? Das Beispiel Leipzig. anne.qsdf.org/dateien/Gentrification-in-Ostdeutschland.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, T. (2001). Urbanization, suburbanization, counterurbanization and reurbanization. In R. Paddinson (Ed.), Handbook of Urban Studies (pp. 143–161). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, H. (2015). “Wage keine Prognose mehr”—Forscher Rink über Leipzigs Wachstum und die Folgen. http://www.lvz.de/Leipzig/Lokales/Wage-keine-Prognose-mehr-Forscher-Rink-ueber-Leipzigs-Wachstum-und-die-Folgen. Accessed 1 September 2015.

  • Cloke, P., Cook, I., Crang, P., Goodwin, M., Painter, J., & Philo, C. (2004). Practising human geography. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comunian, R. (2010). Rethinking the creative city: The role of complexity, networks and interactions in the urban creative economy. Urban Studies, 48, 1157–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comunian, R., & Faggian, A. (2014). Creative graduates and creative cities: Exploring the geography of creative education in the UK. International Journal of Cultural and Creative Industries, 1(2), 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comunian, R., Faggian, A., & Li, Q. C. (2010). Unrewarded careers in the creative class: The strange case of bohemian graduates. Papers in Regional Science, 89(2), 389–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2005). The flight of the creative class: the new global competition for talent. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1994). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In Readings in the Philosophy of Social Science (pp. 213–231). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase, A., Herfert, G., Kabisch, S., & Steinführer, A. (2012). Reurbanizing Leipzig (Germany): Context conditions and residential actors (2000–2007). European Planning Studies, 20(7), 1173–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Moreno, L. (2010). Creative city limits: Urban cultural economy in a New Era of Austerity. London: UCL Urban Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S., & Hahn, J. (2011). Creative cities and (un)sustainability: From creative class to sustainable creative cities. Culture and Local Governance, 3(1), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krätke, S. (2010). ‘Creative cities’ and the rise of the dealer class: A critique of Richard Florida’s approach to urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34(4), 835–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, C., & Bianchini, F. (1995). The creative city. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, B., Burdack, J., Thalmann, R., Manz, K., Nadler, R., & Dziuba, C. (2008). Creative Leipzig. Understanding the attractiveness of the metropolitan region for creative knowledge workers. Amsterdam: AMIDSt University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D. (2003). Artists, aestheticisation and the field of gentrification. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2527–2544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lugosi, P., Bell, D., & Lugosi, K. (2010). Hospitality, culture and regeneration: Urban decay, entrepreneurship and the ‘ruin’ bars of Budapest. Urban Studies, 51, 170–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, A., Gallent, N., Hall, P., Porsch, L., Braun, R., & Pfeiffer, U. (2004). Shrinking to grow? The urban regeneration challenge in Leipzig and Manchester. Town Planning Review, 77(5), 625–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (2006a). The artistic dividend: Urban artistic specialisation and economic development implications. Urban Studies, 43(10), 1661–1686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A. (2006b). Urban development and the politics of a creative class: Evidence from a study of artists. Environment and Planning, 38(10), 1921–1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (2010). The 31 places to go in 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/travel/10places.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1. Accessed 10 Apr 2015.

  • Novy, J., & Colomb, C. (2013). Struggling for the right to the (Creative) City in Berlin and Hamburg: New urban social movements, new ‘Spaces of Hope’? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1816–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J., & Shaw, K. (2014). What next for the creative city? City, Culture and Society, 5(3), 165–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, K., Sperry, B., & Pratt, A. C. (2008). The art of innovation: How fine arts graduates contribute to innovation. London: NESTA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, K. (2009). From Bohemia to Britart–art students over 50 years. Cultural Trends, 18(4), 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 740–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plöger, J. (2007). Leipzig city report. CASE Report, 42. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, A. C. (2004). Creative clusters: Towards the governance of the creative industries production system? Media International Australia, 112, 50–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, A. C. (2008). Creative cities: The cultural industries and the creative class”. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 90(2), 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, A. C. (2011). The cultural contradictions of the creative city. City, Culture and Society, 2(3), 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raabe, M., & M. Waltz. (2014). Swinging Leipzig: Subkulturelles image und marketing http://www.deutschlandfunk.de/swinging-leipzig-subkulturelles-image-und-marketing.1170.de.html?dram:article_id=275496. Accessed 22 Apr 2014.

  • Rehberg, K., & Schmidt, H. (2009). 60/40/20 Kunst in Leipzig seit 1949. Leipzig: Seemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rödel, P., Czarnecki, C., & L. Ruske. (2014). AG zeitgenössische künstlerische Lehre. www.hgb-leipzig.de/agzkl/. Accessed 1 Apr 2015.

  • Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leipzig, S. (2009). Leipzig 2020: Integriertes Stadtentwicklungskonzept (SEKo). Leipzig: Stadt Leipzig Dezernat Stadtentwicklung und Bau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leipzig, S. (2010). Die ‘Kreative Szene’ im Leipziger Westen: Eine Untersuchung über den Einfluss der Kreativen in Plagwitz/Lindenau auf die Stadtteilentwicklung. Wechselwirkungen zwischen Gebietsstrukturen und Szene sowie potenzielle Ansätze zur Entwicklungsverstätigung, Leipzig: Stadtplanungsamt Leipzig Abteilung West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leipzig, S. (2012). Kreative Zukunft: Werkstatt zur Entwicklung des Leipzier Westens. Projekt Creative Cities (INTERREG IV B), Leipzig: Stadt Leipzig, Amt für Stadterneuerung und Wohnungsbauförderung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leipzig, S. (2013). Statistischer Quartalsbericht 4/2013. Leipzig: Stadt Leipzig, Amt fuer Statistik und Wahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leipzig S. (2014). Kommunale Gebietsgliederung. http://www.leipzig.de/buergerservice-und-verwaltung/unsere-stadt/gebietsgliederung-und-strassennamen/kommunale-gebietsgliederung/#c22822. Accessed 8 Sept 2015.

  • Steets, S. (2007). Wir sind die Stadt!: kulturelle Netzwerke und die Konstitution städtischer Räume in Leipzig. Campus-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svob-Dokic, N. (2004). Cultural transitions in Southeastern Europe. Zagreb: Institute for International Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D., Fuhrer, U., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2008). Akteure der Gentrification und ihre Ortsbindung. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 60(2), 340–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, S. J. (2012). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, J. (2011). Beyond the creative city—cultural policy in an age of scarcity. Birmingham: MADE Centre for place-making.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wießner, R. (1999). Urban development in East Germany. Specific features of urban transformation processes. GeoJournal, 49(1), 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiest, K., & Hill, A. (2004). Sanfte Gentrifizierung, Studentifizierung und Inseln ethnischer Konzentration in ostdeutschen Innenstadtrandgebieten? Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 62(6), 361–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., & Keil, R. (2008). The real creative class. Social and Cultural Geography, 9(8), 841–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvie Jacobi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jacobi, S. (2017). Leipzig’s Visual Artists as Actors of Urban Change. In: Murzyn-Kupisz, M., Działek, J. (eds) The Impact of Artists on Contemporary Urban Development in Europe. GeoJournal Library, vol 123. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53217-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53217-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53215-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53217-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics