Skip to main content

Learning and Working Together: Students as Peers and Partners

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Professionalism in Practice

Abstract

Focuses on approaches which enable students to learn with and from one another within and beyond the curriculum. It considers students as partners in co-curricular projects.

The original version of this chapter was revised: For detailed information please see Erratum. The erratum to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54552-3_8

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arendale, D. R. (2014). Understanding the peer assisted learning model: Student study groups in challenging college courses. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college?: Four critical years revisited (Vol. 1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamber, J., & Tett, L. (2000). Transforming the learning experiences of non-traditional students: A perspective from higher education. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(1), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamber, V., & Jones, A. (2014). Challenging students: Enabling inclusive learning. In Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (Eds.), A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice (4th edn, pp. 152–168).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven, P., & Sambell, K. (2008). Student peer mentoring: An assessment for learning (AfL) perspective. Northumbria University, MARCET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birenbaum, M. (2003). New insights into learning and teaching and their implications for assessment. In M. Segers, F. Dochy & E. Cascallar (Eds.)‚ Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (pp. 13–36). Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (2001). Introduction: Making the move to peer learning. In D. Boud, R. Cohen, & J. Sampson (Eds.), Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other (pp. 1–5). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Brew, A. (2013). Reconceptualising academic work as professional practice: Implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(3), 208–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourner, J., Hughes, M., & Bourner, T. (2001). First-year undergraduate experiences of group project work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(1), 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brack, P. (2015). Peer assisted study sessions improve academic achievement. Why don’t more institutions make use of them? The Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 1(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, M. (2011). A Recap of education hack day—Technical. Ly Baltimore. Retrieved December 13, 2016, from http://technical.ly/baltimore/2011/11/21/a-recap-of-education-hack-day/.

  • Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., U.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruffee, K. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, C. (2015). Enhancing student learning. In J. Lea (Ed.), Enhancing learning and teaching in higher education: Engaging with the dimensions of practice (pp. 20–43). Maidenhead, United Kingdom: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. W., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook-Sather, A. (2013). Catalysing multiple forms of engagement: Student-staff partnerships exploring teaching and learning. In E. Dunne & D. Owen (Eds.), The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education (pp. 549–565). Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C., & Felten, P. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty. United States: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. H., Watkins, J., Fagen, A. P., & Mazur, E. (2007). Peer instruction: Engaging students one-on-one, all at once. Research-Based Reform of University Physics, 1(1), 40–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P., van der Meer, J., Skalicky, J., & Cowley, K. (2014). On the effectiveness of supplemental instruction: A systematic review of supplemental instruction and peer-assisted study sessions literature between 2001 and 2010. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), 609–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2015). Staff student partnership in assessment: Enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, E., Zandstra, R., Brown, T., & Nurser, T. (2011). Students as change agents: New ways of engaging with learning and teaching in higher education. Bristol: ESCalate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fenge, L. A. (2012). Enhancing the doctoral journey: The role of group supervision in supporting collaborative learning and creativity. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 401–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foreman-Peck, L., & Winch, C. (2010). Using educational research to inform practice: A practical guide to practitioner research in universities and colleges. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., & Dobbins, K. (2013). Are we serious about enhancing courses? Using the principles of assessment for learning to enhance course evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(2), 142–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S. (2008). Situated knowledge and situated action: What do practice-based studies promise? In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The sage handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 516–525). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, S., Houston, K., Lazenbatt, A., & Baume, C. (1995). Enhancing student learning through peer tutoring in higher education: A compendium resource pack. University of Ulster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. A., Bithell, C. P., Jones, L., & Bidgood, P. (2010). A first year experience of student-directed peer-assisted learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J., & Thomson, J. (2011). Dispositions to stay and to succeed. Project report. York: HEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, M., Flint, A. & Harrington, K. (2014). Engagement through partnership: Students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: HEA. Retrieved December 14, 2016, from https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/engagement_through_partnership.pdf.

  • Hibberson, S. (2016). Summer of student innovation #studentideas. Retrieved December 13, 2016, from https://inspiringlearning.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2016/08/summer-student-innovation/.

  • Hodge, D. C., Nadler, M. K., Shore, C., & Taylor, B. A. (2011). Institutionalizing large scale curricular change: The Top 25 project at Miami University. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(5), 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, M., Scoles, J., Green, U., Purves, S., Welsh, Z., & Gray, A. (2016). ‘Observation has set in’: Comparing students and peers as reviewers of teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, i-first (pp. 1–13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingle, J. (2016). Engaging with academic writing and discourse. In H. Pokorny & D. Warren (Eds.), Enhancing teaching practice in higher education (pp. 144–164). United Kingdom: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaques, D. (2000). Learning in groups: A handbook for face-to-face and online environments (3rd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college what evidence is there that it works? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 30(4), 26–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, C. (2014). Mapping student-led peer learning in the UK. York: The Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienzler, H., & Fontanesi, C. (2016). Learning through inquiry: A global health hackathon. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kift, S. (2009). Articulating a transition pedagogy to scaffold and to enhance the first year student learning experience in Australian higher education: Final report for ALTC senior fellowship program. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kift, S. (2015). A decade of transition pedagogy: A quantum leap in conceptualising the first year experience. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 2, 51–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-Impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities. Retrieved December 13, 2016, from http://provost.tufts.edu/celt/files/High-Impact-Ed-Practices1.pdf.

  • Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking University teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leckart, S. (2012). The Hackathon is on: Pitching and programming the next killer app. Retrieved December 13, 2016, from http://www.wired.com/magazine/2012/02/ff_hackathons.

  • Light, R. J. (2001). Making the most of college: Students speak their minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, A. G. (2012). The growth and current state of learning communities in higher education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 132, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, E. (2013). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W. (1994). Teaching tips: Strategies, research, and theory for college and University teachers (9th ed.). Lexington: DC Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuckie, J., & Topping, K. J. (2004). Transferable skills for online peer learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(5), 563–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam, E. (2008). Unlearning how to teach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(3), 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, T. (2012). Group work assessment: Some key considerations in developing good practice. Planet, 25(1), 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millis, B. J. (1991). Fulfilling the promise of the ‘seven principles’ through cooperative learning: An action agenda for the University classroom. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 2(1991), 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morosanu, L., Handley, K., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Seeking support: Researching first-year students’ experiences of coping with academic life. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(6), 665–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newton, F. B., Ender, S. C., & Gardner, J. N. (2010). Students helping students: A guide for peer educators on college campuses (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, D., & Calderon, D. (Eds.) (2009). International perspectives on the first year experience in higher education. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina, The National Resource Center for the First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ody, M., & Carey, W. (2013). Peer Education. In E. Dunne & D. Owen (Eds.), The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education (pp. 291–312). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Handley, K. (2013). ‘Students’ social learning practice as a way of learning from tutor feedback.’ In S. Merry, M. Price, D. Carless & M. Taras, (Eds.), Reconceptualising feedback in higher education: Developing dialogue with students (pp. 123–132) London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, F., Sweeney, S., Bruce, F. & Baxter, S. (2016). The use of the “Hackathon” in design education: An opportunistic exploration. In DS 83: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE16), Design Education: Collaboration and Cross-Disciplinarity. Aalborg, Denmark, September 8th–9th, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., & Feldman, K. A. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1976). Conversational techniques in the study and practice of education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambell, K., & Graham, L. (2010). Towards an assessment partnership model? Students’ experiences of being engaged as partners in assessment for learning enhancement activity. In S. Little (Ed.), Staff-student partnerships in higher education (pp. 31–47). London: Bloomsbury USA Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambell, K., & Graham, L. (2011). Towards an assessment partnership model? Students experiences of bring engaged as partners in assessment for learning (AfL) enhancement activity. In S. Little (Ed.), Staff-student partnerships in higher education (pp. 31–47). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambell, K., & Graham, L. (2014). Engaging experienced students as academic mentors in support of the first year experience: The epistemic apprenticeship project. In C. Bryson (Ed.), Understanding and developing student engagement (pp. 203–217). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Problem-based learning in higher education: Untold stories. Buckingham, United Kingdom: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1991). Synthesis of research of cooperative learning. Educational leadership, 48(5), 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (2003). Learning better together: The impact of learning communities on student success. Higher Education monograph series, 1(8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Topping, K. J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education, 32(3), 321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, J. (2013). An exploration of practice surrounding student writing in the disciplines in UK higher education from the perspectives of academic teachers. PhD thesis The Open University. Unpublished thesis available at http://oro.open.ac.uk/39206/.

  • van der Meer, J., Spowart, L., & Hart, S. (2013) ‘We need support too’: Providing postgraduate peer support’, In Dunne & Owen (Eds.) The student engagement handbook: Practice in higher education (pp. 313–330).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2009). A social theory of learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists in their own words (pp. 209–218). United Kingdom: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson-Medhurst‚ S. (2016). Student attainment through activity-led cooperative learning. In G. Steventon‚ D. Cureton & L. Clouder (Eds.)‚ Student attainment in higher education: Issues‚ controversies and debates (pp. 127–141). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisker, G., Exley, K., Antoniou, M., & Ridley, P. (2013). Working one-to-one with students: Supervising, coaching, mentoring, and personal tutoring. United Kingdom: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kay Sambell .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sambell, K., Brown, S., Graham, L. (2017). Learning and Working Together: Students as Peers and Partners. In: Professionalism in Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54552-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54552-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54551-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54552-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics