Abstract
The paper is a discussion of the type of cohesive devices that can be found in stand-up comedy, focusing more specifically on callbacks. Other cohesive devices are also mentioned so as to provide some background on how stand-up comedy shows are structured. Stand-up comedy shows are indeed quite generally ignored in the discussion of genre-related cohesion-building mechanisms, and this paper aims at filling this gap. The paper uses as theoretical backdrop the functional linguistics analyses of cohesion, as well as some of the discussions of topic continuity and sequencing done in Conversation and Discourse Analysis. A short comparison with some of the devices used in literary narratives is also proposed, using the tools of French structuralist narratology (Genette’s analepses, in particular), which allows us to delve further into the specificities of the genre. It is shown that the callback technique used in stand-up comedy offers very interesting data on how a discourse can be made coherent at a macro level, vs. the inter-sentential one; such techniques should therefore be included in the repertoire of cohesion-building tokens when these are discussed across genres.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
There are a few studies that have been carried out; there are several student papers some of which can be found online, sometimes without a clear author’s name (http://rudar.ruc.dk/, http://library.binus.ac.id/; the topic of comedy seems to have become popular for both Master’s Theses and seminars). Schwarz’s study (Schwartz 2010) does not specifically focus on cohesion; other studies may not be strictly speaking linguistic, or not linguistic, but they may shed interesting light on the genre and the problems we are discussing here (e.g., Glick 2007; Bolens 2015). The question of narrativity will be dealt with here in relation to cohesion; other dimensions of narrativity may not be included in the paper.
- 2.
Harry Hill is also reputed for his callbacks, but we have not got yet to analyzing his shows.
- 3.
Certain one-liners follow each other thematically, for instance, which creates (usually very) short sub-sections within the shows. Shows made entirely of a succession of one-liners, vs monologues, are nonetheless the exception rather than the rule in our corpus (also see next section).
- 4.
Although it is difficult to explain it in just a few lines, “alternative” – the word is used by the comedians themselves – refers to a form of comedy that is (meant to be) different from what existed before, in its contents (for instance, maybe, self-reference, i.e., using one’s own life as comedy material, for U.S. performers in particular, but not only them) or form (improvisation; performances in small venues such as pubs and clubs; humour is no longer based on jokes…).
- 5.
Wembley Stadium in London sits 90,000 people and the O2, 20,000.
- 6.
Or mothers, although a number of them are men. Examples of women performers are, for instance, Ellen DeGeneres and Elaine May in the U.S.; in the U.K., Jo Brand and Sarah Millican, who are mentioned in this paper, are also women.
- 7.
We will not discuss how the notion of sequences can be applied to shows in detail here.
- 8.
These remarks are provisional.
- 9.
Cf. Phill Jupitus in Quadrophobia (or other shows, cf. QI, Series 10, Episode 3) who uses yeah –as well as Good thing, and True story– to imitate Eddie Izzard.
- 10.
When the audience does not seem to respond to something, Izzard, speaking to himself, says something along the lines of Do not ever mention that again, Never use these two together again, and pretends to write it on his hand for future reference. This has become a well-known gesture and is used across shows.
- 11.
The author’s are probably thinking of the “rule of three” (three is linked to good rhythm) often discussed by comedians. This will not be developed here.
- 12.
Although the last quotation says that callback is not used in the U.K., many examples were found. So reincorporation is just a different name for it.
- 13.
He mentions it in the commentaries of the Force Majeure DVD.
- 14.
See Sect. 3 for an explanation.
- 15.
This retake on a previous routine is what Bolens 2015 mostly focuses on.
- 16.
Anaphors are of course known to (sometimes) function across whole paragraphs, and anaphor chains also function across a whole paragraph, or text. What makes the kind of techniques we have described before perhaps specific is that they necessarily function at the level of the show.
- 17.
We will focus on what is directly linked to callbacks here. A more general discussion, which would necessarily have to be more detailed, will have to be left for elsewhere.
- 18.
In the commentary that is to be found in the Force Majeure DVD.
- 19.
Bauformen des Erzählens, Stuttgart, 1955, 2nd part (Genette 1972: 95).
- 20.
We are not using the word “incongruous” or discussing the incongruity theory of humour on purpose as this would require a specific discussion. Incongruity may create humour, but is, possibly, not the sole source, or a necessarily straightforward source, of humour. We will therefore deliberately not go into this debate here.
- 21.
It is only partly the case in his example, as this is the beginning of a sequence, and so is known to be used when a topic is introduced; this is arguably not a “therefore” so. The next example consequently illustrates the kind of problem we are dealing with here in a clearer way.
References
Barthes, R. (1966). Introduction à l’analyse structurale des récits. Communications, 8, 1–27.
Bolens, G. (2015). Les comédiens de stand-up et la preuve par le rire : le récit comme acte cognitif dans Star Wars Canteen 1 & 2 d’Eddie Izzard. Cahiers de narratologie, 28. http://narratologie.revues.org/7187
Carter, J. (2001). The Comedy Bible: From stand-up to Sitcom–The comedy writer’s ultimate how-to guide. New York: Fireside.
Chauvin, C. (2015). Passer d’un thème à l’autre : Construction de la cohésion/ cohérence dans la stand-up comedy. Etudes de stylistique anglaise 7, Traversées/ Crossings, 141–164.
Double, O. (2014). Getting the joke: The inner workings of stand-up comedy (2nd ed.). London: Methuen Drama.
Duchan, J., Bruder, G. A., & Hewitt, L. E. (Eds.). (1995). Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Genette, G. (1966). Frontières du récit. Communications, 8, 164–172.
Genette, G. (1972). Figures III. Paris: Seuil, Collection “Poétiques”.
Glick, D. J. (2007). Some performative techniques of stand-up comedy: An exercise in the textuality of temporalization. Language and Communication, 27, 291–306.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Helitzer, M., & Shatz, M. (2005). Comedy writing secrets. Cincinnati: Writer’s Digest Books, F+W Publications, Inc.
Labov, W. (1997). Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 395–415.
Labov, W. (2001). Uncovering the event structure of narrative. Georgetown University Round Table 2001. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~wlabov/uesn.pdf. Accessed 19 Nov 2016.
Labov, W. (2004). Ordinary events. In C. Fought (Ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections (pp. 31–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Labov, W. (2006). Narrative preconstruction. Narrative Inquiry, 16, 37–45.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: U. of Washington Press. (Reproduced in 1997 in Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 3–38.)
Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Murray, L. (2010 [2007]). Be a great stand up: Teach yourself. London: Hodder Education.
Propp, V. (1970). Morphologie du conte. Paris: Seuil.
Ritchie, C. (2012). Performing live comedy. London: Methuen Drama.
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schwartz, J. (2010). Linguistic aspects of verbal humour in stand-up comedy. PhD Universität der Saarlandes.
Slobin, D. (2005). Relating narrative events in translation. In D. Ravid & H. B. Shyldkrot (Eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman (pp. 115–129). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Todorov, T. (1966). Les catégories du récit littéraire. Communications, 8, 125–151.
Todorov, T. (1967). Littérature et signification. Paris: Larousse.
Todorov, T. (1971). Poétique de la prose. Paris: Seuil.
Web Pages
Alexander, C. J. Creating a Comic . Bombing, killing, and other occupational hazards of stand-up comedy (blog about « breaking in stand-up comedy »), http://www.creatingacomic.com/comedy-glossary/. Accessed 17 May 2015.
Bromley, P. Callbacks, Glossary of Comedy by Patrick Bromley, Comedians Expert, About : Entertainment, http://comedians.about.com/od/glossary/g/callback.htm. Accessed 17 May 2015.
Callbacks (Comedy) – Wikipedia (English), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Callback_%28comedy%29. Accessed 17 May 2015.
Peck, J.. Secret Comedy Writing Technique – Callbacks, http://prohumorist.com/secret-comedy-writing-technique-callbacks/. Accessed 17 May 2015.
Seven Things Writers can Learn from Stand-up Comedians., https://theamericanscholar.org/seven-things-writers-can-learn-from-stand-up-comedians/#.VVjZerntnBo. Accessed 17 May 2015.
Reddit discussion of would-be comedians and fans on callbacks, http://www.reddit.com/r/Stand-up/comments/29gch1/good_examples_of_callbacks/. Accessed 17 May 2015.
What is the best example of a callback in comedy ? – Quora, http://www.quora.com/What-is-the-best-example-of-a-callback-in-comedy. Accessed 17 May 2015.
Corpus
Bailey, B. (2004). Part Troll. DVD Universal.
Bailey, B. (2008). Tinselworm, Live at Wembley. DVD Universal.
Bailey, B. (2010). Dandelion Mind. DVD Universal.
Bailey, B. (2013). Qualmpeddler. DVD Universal.
Brand, J. (2003). Barely Live. DVD Universal.
Carr, J. (2013). Laughing and Talking. DVD Channel 4.
Davies, A. (2013). Life is Pain. DVD 2 Entertain.
Djalili, O. (2009). Omid Djalili Live in London. DVD Anchor Bay.
Djalili, O. (2012). Tour of Duty. DVD Anchor Bay.
Izzard, E. (1996). Definite Article. DVD Universal.
Izzard, E. (1997). Glorious. DVD Universal.
Izzard, E. (1998). Dressed to Kill. DVD Universal.
Izzard, E. (2002). Circle. DVD Universal.
Izzard, E. (2003). Sexie. DVD Universal.
Izzard, E. (2009). Stripped. DVD Universal.
Izzard, E. (2013). Force Majeure. DVD Universal.
Izzard, E. (2015–2016). Force Majeure Reloaded (tour).
Jupitus, P. (2011). Quadrophobia. DVD Universal.
Lock, S. (2008). Sean Lock Live. DVD Universal.
Lock, S. (2010). Lockipedia Live. DVD Universal.
Mack, L. (2010). Going Out Live. DVD Anchor Bay.
Millican, S. (2011). Chatterbox Live. DVD Channel 4.
Noble, R. (2013). Mindblender. DVD Universal.
O’Briain, D. (2012). Craic Dealer. DVD Universal.
Vine, T. (2004). Live. DVD Entertain Video.
Vine, T. (2011). The Jokeamotive Live. DVD Spirit Entertainment Ltd.
Vine, T. (2010). Punslinger Live. DVD Spirit Entertainment Ltd.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chauvin, C. (2017). Callbacks in Stand-Up Comedy: Constructing Cohesion at the Macro Level Within a Specific Genre. In: Aijmer, K., Lewis, D. (eds) Contrastive Analysis of Discourse-pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Genres. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54556-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54556-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54554-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54556-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)