Skip to main content
  • 538 Accesses

Abstract

The overall setup of a surgical procedure is an important part of the effectiveness and organization of a surgery. As robotic surgery grows every day, more hernia repair procedures have been done using this technology and a standardized, well-organized setup in this area has to be drawn to make this procedure safer, feasible, and reproducible.

In this context of organization and setup, ergonomics is an important part. Many studies in fields other than medicine show its impact in performance and outcomes. In the surgical field that becomes even more important when we add the patient outcomes, efficiency, and costs. Ergonomics is the applied science of equipment and workplace design and this can have an impact not only in the operating room (OR), but also on the surgical staff and other devices such as the robot.

There are many parts of the robotic setup, but three of them can be discussed a little further: overall OR setup, patient’s preparation, and the robotic docking. The first one is focused on the preparation of the room in order to maximize the effectiveness of the procedure, reduce costs, and organize all the factors involved in the surgery. This setup has to be standardized to be always reproducible and to facilitate the work of the surgical team, each with his or her specific roles. Devices, cables, cannulas, and even the surgical staff have to respect the patient’s treatment as the center of the procedure. His preparation is the second part of the robotic setup. All patients have a preoperative preparation with all the elements to secure their safety. Inside the operation he is positioned in a way to have the best surgical performance without any injury throughout the procedure. At last the robotic docking has an important role because it impacts on the OR setup, patient’s positioning, and team roles. There are many types of dockings and the same operation can have more than one. Thus the overall setup depends on the planning of the docking to be done in each type of hernia repair and patient to be treated.

After the setup is done and the surgery occurs, the surgical team and other people responsible for the robotic program can organize specific meetings to discuss the problems and the possible solutions. This feedback is important to standardize the setup and keep it evolving after each procedure.

In summary, with a straightforward program centered in a well-organized and standardized robotic setup one can have high effectiveness, with safety and feasibility, and can keep learning and evolving with each procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury JK Jr. Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg. 2004;188:2S–15S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaplan K, Hunter I, Durlach NI, et al. A virtual environment for a surgical room of the future. In: Satava RM, Morgan K, Sieburg HB, et al., editors. Znteructi~e technology and the new paradigm for healthcare, vol. 18. San Diego: I.O.S. Press; 1995. p. 161–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Batnaeer V, Drurv CC, Schiro SC. Posture, postural discomfort, and perfomance. Huk Fars. 1985;27:189–99.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lawrence WH, Berry CH. Arrangement of the operating room. Am J Surg. 1939;43:664–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lasser MS, Patel CK, Elsamra SE, Renzulli JF, Haleblian GE, Pareek G. Dedicated robotics team reduces pre-surgical preparation time. Indian J Urol. 2012;28:263–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Narula VK, Melvin SM. Robotic surgical systems. In: Patel VR, editor. Robotic urologic surgery. London: Springer-Verlag; 2007. p. 5–14.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Intuitive Surgical Inc. www.intuitivesurgical.com.

  8. Cestari A, Buffi NM, Scapaticci E, Lughezzani G, Salonia A, Briganti A, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Guazzoni G. Simplifying patient positioning and port placement during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57:530–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Chapman WH, Felger JE, Bailey BM, Ballint T, Mendleson KG, Kim VB, Young JA, Albrecht RA. Robotic surgical training in an academic institution. Ann Surg. 2011;4:475–84.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Sundaram CP, McDougall EM. Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. J Urol. 2011;185:1191–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hayashibe M, Suzuki N, Hashizume M, Kakeji Y, Konishi K, Suzuki S, Hattori A. Preoperative planning system for surgical robotics setup with kinematics and haptics. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. 2005;1(2):76–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rocco B, Lorusso A, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Patel VR. Building a robotic program. Scand J Surg. 2009;98:72–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palmer KJ, Lowe GJ, Coughlin DG, Patil N, Patel VR. Launching a successful robotic surgery program. J Endourol. 2008;22:819–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wisner A. Fatigue and human reliability revisited in the light of ergonomics and work psychopathology. Ergonomics. 1989;32:891–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Random House Kernerman Webster’s College Dictionary, © 2010. K Dictionaries Ltd. Copyright 2005, 1997, 1991 by Random House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thiago Nogueira Costa PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Glossary [15]

Ergonomics

The applied science of equipment design, as for the workplace, intended to maximize productivity by reducing operator fatigue and discomfort. Also called biotechnology, human engineering, or human factors engineering. Design factors, as for the workplace, intended to maximize productivity by minimizing operator fatigue and discomfort.

Master console

The main terminal used by the computer operator or systems programmer to command the computer. The system seamlessly translates the surgeon’s hand, wrist, and finger movements into precise, real-time movements of surgical instruments.

Patient’s cart

The patient-side cart is where the patient is positioned during surgery. It includes either three or four robotic arms that carry out the surgeon’s commands.

Robotic docking

The act of placing the robot in the surgical field and attaching it to the patient’s cannulas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Costa, T.N. (2018). Robotic Setup. In: Abdalla, R., Costa, T. (eds) Robotic Surgery for Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55527-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55527-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55526-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55527-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics