Skip to main content

Community-Based Cumulative Impact Assessment: California’s Approach to Integrating Nonchemical Stressors into Environmental Assessment Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Chemical Mixtures and Combined Chemical and Nonchemical Stressors

Abstract

Risk assessment is complex and challenges assessors to expand its utility and bridge data gaps to better account for human health risk. Mixtures complicate the assessment landscape because cumulative chemical exposures occur at the nexus of nonchemical stressors that can influence adverse health outcomes. Traditional risk assessment approaches typically use comprehensive data sources and quantitative methods but have a limited capacity to account for or include nonchemical stressors. In contrast, community-based cumulative impact assessments utilize different types of data and apply both quantitative and semiquantitative methods. Recently, multiple approaches for cumulative impact assessment have been developed. One such example is the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool: CalEnviroScreen. CalEnviroScreen has been successful in evaluating the cumulative pollution burden at a census tract scale across the state, based on 12 pollution indicators. It also characterizes population vulnerabilities at the same scale, based on intrinsic and extrinsic factors (three health and four socioeconomic status indicators). The two indices are combined in a way that allows one to screen and identify communities across California at above or below various thresholds in the scale. CalEnviroScreen allows one to understand the similarities and differences between the most disadvantaged communities having similar scores. CalEnviroScreen has been instrumental in (a) identifying the disadvantaged communities across California that receive prioritized funding from Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funds derived from the cap-and-trade program, (b) prioritizing areas for targeted multimedia enforcement action, and (c) assisting California Environmental Protection Agency boards and departments with planning community engagement and outreach efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 239.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 239.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A subsequent version of CalEnviroscreen (3.0) with additional indicators and some modifications has been released since this chapter was authored. CalEnviroScreen 3.0 can be accessed at https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-30.

References

  • Abara, W., W. Sacoby, J. Vena, et al. 2014. Engaging a chemical disaster community: Lessons from Graniteville. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11: 5684–5697.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Alexeeff, A., and M. Marty. 2008. Protection of infants, children and other sensitive subpopulations. In Risk assessment for chemicals in drinking water, ed. R.A. Howd and A.M. Fan. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexeeff, G.V., and A.Y. Mataka. 2014. CalEnviroScreen: A pathway to address environmental justice issues in California. EM Mag 1: 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexeeff, G.V., J.B. Faust, L.M. August, et al. 2012. A screening method for assessing cumulative impacts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 9: 648–659.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • ATEB: Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Branch. 2008. Air toxics “hot spots” risk assessment guidelines: Technical support document for the derivation of noncancer reference exposure levels. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency. http://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/noncancertsdfinal.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • ATEB: Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Branch. 2009. Air toxics “hot spots” risk assessment guidelines: Technical support document for cancer potency factors. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency. http://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/tsdcancerpotency.pdf . Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • August, L.M., J.B. Faust, L. Cushing, et al. 2012. Methodological considerations in screening for cumulative environmental health impacts: Lessons learned from a pilot study in California. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 9 (9): 3069–3084.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Batterman, S., F. Su, S. Li, et al. 2014. Personal exposure to mixtures of volatile organic compounds: Modeling and further analysis of the RIOPA data. Research report Health Effects Institute 181: 3–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CalEPA. 2003. Recommendations of the California Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) Advisory Committee on Environmental Justice to the Cal/EPA Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice: Final Report. California Environmental Agency. https://calepa.ca.gov/wpcontent/uploads/sites/34/2016/10/EnvJustice-Documents-2003yr-FinalReport.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.

  • ———. 2005. Cal/EPA Environmental Justice Advisory Committee (CEJAC) Adopted Working Definitions of Cumulative Impacts and Precautionary Approaches. CEJAC Meeting 15 Feb 2005. California Environmental Agency. http://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/calenviroscreen/document/workingdefs052808.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • ———. 2014. Designation of disadvantaged communities pursuant to Senate Bill 535 (De Leon). California Environmental Protection Agency. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b82a/a9e8695d3a8ff41ff7732a4e35cd4531c08a.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.

  • California Government Code. 1999 §65040.12(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • CDC: Centers for Disease Control. 2002. Childhood lead poisoning associated with tamarind candy and folk remedies- California, 199-2000. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 51: 684–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDPR. 2005. DPR Environmental Justice Update. CDPR Press Release 23 Feb 2005. California Environmental Agency Department of Pesticide Regulation. http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/envjust/envjust_update.htm. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • Corburn, J. 2015. City planning as preventive medicine. Preventive Medicine 77: 48–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.A., J.R.M. Ross, S.N. Bezalel, et al. 2012. Contaminants in fish from the California coast, 2009–2010: Summary report on a two-year screening survey. Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP), California State Water Resources Control Board, California Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/swamp/docs/coast_study/bog2012may/coast2012report.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • De Leon, K. 2012. Senate Bill 535: California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. California State Senate, Chapter 830, Statutes of 2012. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_0501-0550/sb_535_bill_20120930_chaptered.html. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • Dunn, A.J., and G.V. Alexeeff. 2010. Beyond risk assessment: Principles for assessing community impacts. International Journal of Toxicology 29 (1): 78–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • English, P. 2013. Racial and income disparities in relation to a proposed climate change vulnerability screening method for California. The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses 4 (2): 1–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, A.M., G.V. Alexeeff, and S.B. Harris. 2010. Cumulative risks and cumulative impacts of environmental chemical exposures. International Journal of Toxicology 29 (1): 57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faust, J.B. 2010. Perspectives on cumulative risks and impacts. International Journal of Toxicology 29 (1): 58–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faustman, E.M., and G.S. Omenn. 2008. Risk Assessment. In Casarett and Doull’s toxicology: The basic science of poisons, ed. C.D. Klaassen, 7th ed., 107–128. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • deFur, Peter L., Gary W. Evans, Elaine A. Cohen Hubal, Amy D. Kyle, Rachel A. Morello-Frosch, and David R. Williams. 2007. Vulnerability as a function of individual and group resources in cumulative risk assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives 115 (5): 817–824.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gase, L.N., T. Kuo, S. Teutsch, et al. 2014. Estimating the costs and benefits of providing free public transit passes to students in Los Angeles County: Lessons learned in applying a health lens to decision-making. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11: 11384–11397.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, G.C., and D.C. Payne-Sturges. 2004. Environmental health disparities: A framework integrating psychosocial and environmental concepts. Environmental Health Perspectives 112: 1645–1653.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hallgren, E.A., P.A. McElfish, and J. Rubon-Chutaro. 2014. Barriers and opportunities: A community-based participatory research study of health beliefs related to diabetes in a US Marshallese community. The Diabetes Educator 41: 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721714559131.

  • Howd, R.A. 2010. Considering changes in exposure and sensitivity in an early life cumulative risk assessment. International Journal of Toxicology 29 (1): 71–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, G., and J.K. London. 2012. Cumulative environmental vulnerability and environmental justice in California’s San Joaquin Valley. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 9: 1593–1608.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson Thornton, R.L., A. Greiner, C.M. Fichtenberg, et al. 2013. Achieving a healthy zoning policy in Baltimore: Results of a health impact assessment of the TransForm Baltimore zoning code rewrite. Public Health Reports 128 (Suppl 3): 87–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • LACEHJ: Los Angeles Collaborative for Environmental Health and Justice. 2010. Hidden hazards: A call to action for healthy, livable communities. Liberty Hill Foundation: Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.J., L. Mehler, J. Beckman, et al. 2011. Acute pesticide illnesses associated with off-target pesticide drift from agricultural applications: 11 states, 1998–2006. Environmental Health Perspectives 119 (8): 1162–1169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • London, J.K., G. Huang, and T. Zagofsky. 2011. Land of Risk/Land of Opportunity: Cumulative Environmental Vulnerabilities in California’s San Joaquin Valley. UC Davis Center for Regional Change. https://regionalchange.ucdavis.edu/news/ceva-san-joaquin-valley. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • London, J.K., T. Greenfield, and T. Zagofsky, 2013. Revealing the Invisible Coachella Valley: Putting Cumulative Environmental Vulnerabilities on the Map. UC Davis Center for Regional Change and the California Institute for Rural Studies. https://regionalchange.ucdavis.edu/project/ceva-eastern-coachella-valley. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • McCloskey, D.J., S. Aguilar-Gaxiola, J.L. Michener, et al. 2011. Principles of Community Engagement. Silberberg M et al (eds.) Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium, Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force Report, 2nd edn. National Institutes of Health Publication No. 11–7782. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • Medina-Ramon, M., and J. Schwartz. 2008. Who is more vulnerable to die from ozone air pollution? Epidemiology 19 (5): 672–679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, M., M.A. Marty, A. Arcus, et al. 2002. Differences between children and adults: Implications for risk assessment at California EPA. International Journal of Toxicology 21: 403–418.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • NAS: National Academy of Sciences. 1983. Risk assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the process. Washington, DC: Natl Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAS: National Academy of Sciences. 2009. Science and decisions: Advancing risk assessment. Washington, DC: Natl Academy Press, National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEJAC: National Environmental Justice Advisory Council. 2004. Ensuring Risk Reduction in Communities with Multiple Stressors: Environmental Justice and Cumulative Risks/Impacts. Eady V et al (eds) National Environmental Justice Advisory Council, Cumulative Risks/Impacts Work Group Report. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-04/documents/ensuringriskreducationnejac.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • New Jersey. 2014. NJ-GeoWeb. Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Environmental Justice, Bureau of GIS. http://www.nj.gov/dep/gis/geowebsplash.htm. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • ———. 2016. State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Environmental Justice, Smart Growth and Environmental Justice Division. http://www.nj.gov/dep/ej/resources.html#smartgrowth. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • Nunez, F. 2006. Assembly Bill 32: California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. California State Assembly, Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_32_bill_20060927_chaptered.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • OEHHA. 2001. California sport fish consumption advisories: Important facts to know if you can eat the fish you catch in California. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency. http://seafood.oregonstate.edu/.pdf%20Links/Sport-fish-consumption-advisories.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • OEHHA. 2010. Cumulative impacts: Building a scientific foundation. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency. http://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/calenviroscreen/report/cireport123110.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • ———. 2013. Responses to major comments on the CalEnviroScreen public review drafts, April 2013. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency. http://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/calenviroscreen/document/042313resptocom.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • ———. 2014a. California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool, Version 2.0 (CalEnviroScreen 2.0): Guidance and Screening Tool. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency. http://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/report/ces20finalreportupdateoct2014.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • ———. 2014b. Summary of Major Changes in CalEnviroScreen 2.0, October 2014. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency. http://oehha.ca.gov/media/CES20SummaryMajorChanges.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • Pager, D., and H. Shepherd. 2008. The sociology of discrimination: Racial discrimination in employment, housing, credit, and consumer markets. Annual Review of Sociology 34: 181–209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, M., R. Morello-Frosch, and J. Sadd. 2013. Screening for justice: Proactive spatial approaches for environmental disparities. Environmental Managers 8: 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter L. deFur, Gary W. Evans, Elaine A. Cohen Hubal, Amy D. Kyle, Rachel A. Morello-Frosch, David R. Williams, (2007) Vulnerability as a Function of Individual and Group Resources in Cumulative Risk Assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives 115 (5):817-824

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohanka, M., and S. Fitzgerald. 2004. Urban sprawl and you: How sprawl adversely affects worker health. Journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses 52 (6): 242–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porebski, G., M. Wozniak, E. Czarnobilska, et al. 2014. Residential proximity to major roadways is associated with increased prevalence of allergic respiratory symptoms in children. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 21 (4): 760–766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, S., and S. Murphy. 2016. Moving from a ‘risk’ to ‘impact’ paradigm is critical to achieve environmental justice. Environmental Managers 66: 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, S.L., P. Schafer, J.L. DeClerque, et al. 2015. The preconception stress and resiliency pathways model: A multi-level framework on maternal, paternal, and child health disparities derived by community-based participatory research. Maternal and Child Health Journal 19: 707–719.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sadd, J.L., M. Pastor, R. Morello-Frosch, et al. 2011. Playing it safe: Assessing cumulative impact and social vulnerability through an environmental justice screening method in the South Coast Air Basin, California. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 8 (5): 1441–1459.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sadd, J.L., R. Morello-Frosch, M. Pastor, et al. 2014. The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the ground-truth: Methods to advance environmental justice and researcher-community partnerships. Health, Education and Behavior 4 (3): 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, A.G. 2010. Do standard risk assessment procedures adequately account for cumulative risks? An exploration of the possibilities using California’s air toxics hot spots guidelines. International Journal of Toxicology 29 (1): 65–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, N.A., C.A. von Glascoe, V. Torres, et al. 2015. “Where they (live, work and) spray”: Pesticide exposure, childhood asthma and environmental justice Mexican-American farmworkers. Health and Place 32: 83–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shmool, J.L., M.A. Yonas, O.D. Newman, et al. 2015. Identifying perceived neighborhood stressors across diverse communities in New York City. American Journal of Community Psychology 56 (1–2): 145–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tso, P., A.J. Culyer, M. Brouwers, et al. 2011. Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: A study protocol. Implementation Science 6: 46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. Census Tallies of Census Tracts, Block Groups and Blocks. https://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/tallies/tractblock.html. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • U.S. EPA. (1989). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) Part A. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/rags_a.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • U.S. EPA. 1991. Guidelines for Developmental Toxicity Risk Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. EPA/600/FR-91/001. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/risk/recordisplay.cfm?deid=23162. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • ———. 1992. Guidelines for Exposure Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. EPA/600/Z-92/001.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Guidelines for Reproductive Toxicity Risk Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. EPA/630/R-96/009.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment. Barnes DG, Firestone M, Forman DL et al (eds) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Risk Assessment Forum Report, US EPA Publication No. EPA/630/P-02/001F. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-11/documents/frmwrk_cum_risk_assmnt.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • ———. 2004. What you need to know about mercury in fish and shellfish. 2004 EPA and FDA advice for: women who might become pregnant, women who are pregnant, nursing mothers, young children. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-823-R-04-005. http://www.foodprotect.org/issues/packets/2010Packet/attachments/I_006__all.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.

  • ———. 2005a. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. EPA/630/P-03/001Fs.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005b. Supplemental Guidance for Assessing Susceptibility from Early Life Exposure to Carcinogens. Risk Assessment Forum, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. EPA/630/P-03/003F.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Benchmark Dose Technical Guidance. Risk Assessment Forum, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. EPA/100-R-12-001.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Federal Interagency Working Group on Environmental Justice National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)/EJ Resource Compendium. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-02/documents/nepa-ej-compendium.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • ———. 2014. EJSCREEN fact sheet. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-07/documents/ejscreen_fact_sheet.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • ———. 2015. Action development process: Guidance on considering environmental justice during the development of regulatory actions. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/considering-ej-in-rulemaking-guide-final.pdf. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  • Zanobetti, A., and J. Schwartz. 2011. Ozone and survival in four cohorts with potentially predisposing diseases. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 184 (7): 836–841.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shannon R. Murphy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Murphy, S.R., Prasad, S.B., Faust, J.B., Alexeeff, G.V. (2018). Community-Based Cumulative Impact Assessment: California’s Approach to Integrating Nonchemical Stressors into Environmental Assessment Practices. In: Rider, C., Simmons, J. (eds) Chemical Mixtures and Combined Chemical and Nonchemical Stressors. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56234-6_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics