Abstract
The goal of this chapter is to demonstrate a practical application of the maximum entropy method. While there are multiple approaches to quantifying uncertainty (both aleatoric and epistemic), the maximum entropy method is commonly used to study joint mechanics due to the high epistemic uncertainty in these systems. The maximum entropy method is applied to the Ampair 600 Wind Turbine. Experimental data is used to drive the development of several numerical models. Results demonstrate that accounting for aleatoric uncertainty alone will lead to nonconservative predictions of the system response. However, once epistemic uncertainty is included in the model, results span the complete set of measured responses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
B.M. Adams et al., DAKOTA, a multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimizations, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantifications, and sensitivity analysis; version 5.0 user’s manual. SAND2010–2183, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (2010)
M.S. Allen, R.L. Mayes, Estimating degree of nonlinearity in transient responses with zeroed early-time fast Fourier transforms. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 24, 2049–2064 (2010)
A. Batou, C. Soize, S. Audebert, Model identification in computational stochastic dynamics using experimental modal data. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 50–51, 307–322 (2014)
R.R. Craig, M.C.C. Bampton, Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. AIAA J. 6(7), 1313–1319 (1968)
H.C. Edwards, Sierra framework version 3: core services theory and design. SAND2002-3616, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (2002)
J. Groß et al., Model updating of the Ampair wind turbine substructures, in 32nd International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC XXXII), Orlando, FL (2014)
D. Hensley, R.L. Mayes, Extending SMAC to multiple references, in 24th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC XXIV), St. Louis, MO (2006)
R.L. Mayes, An introduction to the SEM substructures focus group test bed – the Ampair 600 wind turbine, in 30th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC XXX), Jacksonville, FL (2012)
D.J. Segalman, A four-parameter Iwan model for lap-type joints. ASME J. Appl. Mech. 72, 752–760 (2005)
D.J. Segalman et al., Handbook on dynamics of jointed structures. Technical Report SAND2009-4164, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM (2009)
C. Soize, Maximum entropy approach for modeling random uncertainties in transient elastodynamics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 1979–1996 (2001)
C. Soize, Random matrix theory for modeling uncertainties in computational mechanics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 194, 1333–1366 (2004)
C. Soize, Generalized probabilistic approach of uncertainties in computational dynamics using random matrices and polynomial chaos decompositions. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 81, 939–970 (2010)
X.Q. Wang, M.P. Mignolet, Stochastic Iwan-type model of a bolted joint: formulation and identification, in 32nd International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC XXXII), Orlando, FL (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robertson, B.A., Bonney, M.S., Gastaldi, C., Brake, M.R.W. (2018). Quantifying Epistemic and Aleatoric Uncertainty in the Ampair 600 Wind Turbine. In: Brake, M. (eds) The Mechanics of Jointed Structures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56818-8_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56818-8_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56816-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56818-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)