Skip to main content

Advertising Effectiveness and Media Exposure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Marketing Decision Models

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 254))

Abstract

This chapter updates the prior Advertising Models chapter, with a particular focus on advertising effectiveness. Moreover, effectiveness is examined in the context of multimedia advertising campaigns. This chapter also examines media selection models, particularly in an online environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abhishek, Vibhanshu, Peter S. Fader, and Kartik Hosanagar. 2014. Media exposure through the funnel: A model of multi-stage attribution. Working paper, Heinz College, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderl, Eva, Ingo Becker, Florian V. Wangenheim, and Jan H. Schumann. 2014. Mapping the customer journey: A graph-based framework for online attribution modeling. Working paper, Passau University, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assael, Henry, and David Poltrack. 1993. Using single source data to select tv programs. Journal of Advertising Research 33 (1): 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollinger, Bryan K., M.A. Cohen, and J. Lai. 2013. Measuring asymmetric persistence and interaction effects of media across platforms. Working paper, NYU. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2342349.

  • Brooke, Zach. 2016. Marketers report big increases in social media spending with little to show in return. American Marketing Association, Marketing News Weekly. https://www.ama.org/publications/eNewsletters/Marketing-News-Weekly/Pages/Social-Media-Spending-Worth-It.aspx#sthash.xTZgYFE2.dpuf. Accessed 29 Feb 2016.

  • Bucklin, Randolph E. and Paul R. Hoban. 2016. Marketing models for internet advertising. In Handbook of marketing decision models, 2nd ed, eds. Berend Wierenga and Ralf van der Lans. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Yuhmiin, and Esther Thorson. 2004. Television and web advertising synergies. Journal of Advertising 33 (2): 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, Peter J. 2007. Modeling page views across multiple websites with an application to internet reach and frequency prediction. Marketing Science 26 (3) (May/June): 422–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, Peter J. 2008. Advertising models. In Handbook of marketing decision models, ed. Berend Wierenga, and New York, 81–106. NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, Peter J., and Tracey S. Dagger. 2013. Comparing the relative effectiveness of advertising channels: A case study of a multimedia blitz campaign. Journal of Marketing Research 50 (4) (August): 517–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, Peter J., and Tracey S. Danaher. 2016. Multimedia advertising effectiveness in a multichannel and multibrand environment. Working paper, Monash University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, Peter J., Janghyuk Lee, and Laoucine Kerbache. 2010. Optimal internet media selection. Marketing Science 29 (2) (March): 336–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, Peter J., G. Mullarkey, and S. Essegaier. 2006. Factors affecting website visit duration: A cross-domain analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 43 (May): 182–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, Peter J., Andre Bonfrer, and Sanjay Dhar. 2008. The effect of competitive advertising interference on sales for packaged goods. Journal of Marketing Research 45 (April): 211–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, Peter J., and John R. Rossiter. 2011. Comparing perceptions of marketing communication channels. European Journal of Marketing 45 (1/2): 6–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, Peter J., and Mike Smith. 2011. Modeling multivariate distributions using copulas: Applications in marketing (with discussion and rejoinder). Marketing Science 30 (1): 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, Peter J., Mike Smith, Kulan Ranasinghe, and Tracey S. Danaher. 2015. Where, when and how long: Factors that influence the effectiveness of mobile phone coupons. Journal of Marketing Research 52 (5) (October): 710–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, Peter. J., and Harald van Heerde. 2016. The delusion of attribution: Caveats in attributing multimedia exposures to purchases. Working paper, Monash University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, Peter J., and Rong Zhang. 2016. Modeling the inter-brand, purchase channel and cross promotional effects for luxury clothing goods. Working paper, Monash University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinner, Isaac, Harald J. van Heerde, and Scott A. Neslin. 2014. Driving online and offline sales: The cross-channel effects of traditional, online display, and paid search advertising. Journal of Marketing Research 51 (5): 527–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, Majorie, Heidi E. Buijtels, and W. Fred van Raaij. 2005. Separate and joint effects of medium type on consumer responses: A comparison of television, print and the internet. Journal of Business Research 58: 37–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreze, Xavier, and Francois X. Hussherr. 2003. Internet advertising: Is anybody watching? Journal of Interactive Marketing 17 (4): 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edell, Julie, and Kevin Lane Keller. 1989. The information processing of coordinated media campaigns. Journal of Marketing Research 26 (May): 149–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, Nathan, Zheng Fang, and Xueming Luo. 2015. Geo-conquesting: Competitive locational targeting of mobile promotions. Journal of Marketing Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Edward J., Alan L. Montgomery, and Leonard M. Lodish. 2004. Consumer shopping and spending across retail formats. Journal of Business 77 (2): S25–S60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frison, Steffi, Marnik G. Dekimpe, Christophe Croux, and Peter De Maeyer. 2014. Billboard and cinema advertising: Missed opportunity or spoiled arms? International Journal of Research in Marketing 31: 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, Andre, Kathleen Seiders, and Glenn B. Voss. 2011. Enough is enough! The fine line in executing multichannel relational communication. Journal of Marketing 75 (July): 94–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havlena, William, Robert Cardarelli, and Michelle de Montigny. 2007. Quantifying the isolated and synergistic effects of exposure frequency for tv, print and internet advertising. Journal of Advertising Research: 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joo, Mingyu, Ken C. Wilbur, Bo Cowgill, and Yi Zhu. 2013. Television advertising and online search. Management Science 60 (1): 56–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Dean M., and Roland T. Rust. 1993. The impact of cable and VCR penetration on network viewing: assessing the decade. Journal of Advertising Research 33 (January): 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, Ashish, Ram Bezawada, Rishika Rishika, Ramkumar Janakiraman, and P.K. Kannan. 2016. From social to sale: The effects of firm-generated content in social media on customer behavior. Journal of Marketing 80 (1): 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht, Anja, and Catherine Tucker. 2013. When does retargeting work? Information specificity in online advertising. Journal of Marketing Research 50 (October): 561–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Hongshuang (Alice) and P.K. Kannan. 2014. Attributing conversions in a multichannel online marketing environment: An empirical model and a field experiment. Journal of Marketing Research (51) (February): 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Chen, Sriram Venkataraman, and Sandy D. Jap. 2013. Media multiplexing behavior: Implications for targeting and media planning. Marketing Science 32 (2): 310–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodish, Leonard M., Magid Abraham, Stuart Kalmenson, Jeanne Livelsberger, Beth Lubetkin, Bruce Richardson, and Mary Ellen Stevens. 1995. How TV. Advertising works: A Meta-analysis of 389 real world split cable tv advertising experiments. Journal of Marketing Research, (37) (May): 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnostic. 2008. Marketing measurement misplay: Project apollo is dead. http://magnostic.wordpress.com/2008/02/25/marketing-measurement-misplay-project-apollo-is-dead/. Accessed 15 June 2012.

  • Manchanda, Puneet, Jean-Pierre Dube, Khim Yong Goh, and Pradeep K. Chintagunta. 2006. The effect of banner advertising on internet purchasing. Journal of Marketing Research 43 (February): 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Christine. 2012. The CMO survey: Highlights and insights, February 2012. http://cmosurvey.org/files/2012/03/The_CMO_Survey_Highlights_and_Insights_Feb-2012_Final.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2012.

  • Naik, Prasad A., and Kay Peters. 2009. A hierarchical marketing communications model of online and offline media synergies. Journal of Interactive Marketing 23: 288–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naik, Prasad A., and Kalyan Raman. 2003. Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. Journal of Marketing Research 40 (November): 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Young-Hoon, and Peter S. Fader. 2004. Modeling browsing behavior at multiple websites. Marketing Science 23(3) (Summer): 280–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, Courtney, Lan Luo, and Gareth James. 2014. Optimal large-scale internet media selection, paper presented at the marketing science conference. Atlanta, Georgia: Emory University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins, Remco, and Peter C. Verhoef. 2007. Marketing communication drivers of adoption timing of a new e-service among existing customers. Journal of Marketing 71 (April): 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmanov, O.V. 1966. Generalized normal correlations and two-dimensional frechet classes Doklady. Soviet Mathematics 168: 596–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweidel, David A., and Robert J. Kent. 2010. Predictors of the gap between program and commercial audiences: An investigation using live tuning data. Journal of Marketing 74 (May): 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethuraman, Raj, Gerard J. Tellis, and Richard A. Briesch. 2011. How well does advertising work? Generalizations from meta-analysis of brand advertising elasticities. Journal of Marketing Research 48 (June): 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, David L. 2003. Online Reach and Frequency: An Update, April. http://www.mediasmithinc.com/white/msn/msn042003.html.

  • Srinivasan, Shuba, Oliver Rutz, and Koen Pauwels. 2015. Paths to and off purchase: Quantifying the impact of traditional marketing and online consumer activity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, Rajendra, and David Reibstein. 2005. Metrics for linking marketing to financial performance. Marketing science institute report no. 05–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heerde, Van, Els Gijbrechts Harald, and Koen Pauwels. 2008. Winners and losers in a major price war. Journal of Marketing Research 45 (October): 499–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef, Peter C., Werner J. Reinartz, and Manfred Krafft. 2010. customer engagement as a new perspective on customer management. Journal of Service Research, 13 (3) 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesel, Thorsten, Koen Pauwels, and Joep Arts. 2011. Marketing’s profit impact: Quantifying online and offline funnel progression. Marketing Science, 30 (4), 604–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, Kenneth C., and Yi Zhu. 2009. Click Fraud. Marketing Science 28 (2): 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zantedeschi, Daniel, Eleanor McDonnell Feit, and Eric T. Bradlow. 2016. Measuring multi-channel advertising response. SSRN working paper.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Danaher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Danaher, P.J. (2017). Advertising Effectiveness and Media Exposure. In: Wierenga, B., van der Lans, R. (eds) Handbook of Marketing Decision Models. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 254. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56941-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics