Skip to main content

The Efficient Innovator

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reinventing Innovation

Abstract

This chapter reviews the contents of the book and its central arguments. It acknowledges that external change operates as a consistent presence rather than as an exception, but that a productive organizational response incorporates both instability and stability. This culminates in a paradox of sorts, wherein sustainable success demands a commitment to simultaneously high levels of both innovation and control. It is at this energetic intersection of both where ambidexterity capability receives its impetus. The chapter highlights the book’s proposition that success requires simultaneous exploration and exploitation in high doses, encouraging tension and discontinuity. Finally, the chapter summarizes the argument for a duality ecosystem fostering ambidexterity because it augments the conversion of ideas into commercial implementation without compromising speed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chen, M.-J. (2008). Reconceptualizing the competition-cooperation relationship: A transparadox perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4), 288–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. R., da Cunha, J. V., & e Cunha, M. P. (2002). Management paradoxes: A relational view. Human Relations, 55(5), 483–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1992). A behavioral theory of the firm (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. E. (2000). Paradox, spirals, ambivalence: The new language of change and pluralism. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 703–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (1999). HRM on the edge: A duality perspective. Organization, 6(2), 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P., & Doz, Y. (1989). The dualistic organization. In P. Evans, Y. Doz, & A. Laurent (Eds.), Human resource management in international firms: Change, globalization, innovation (pp. 219–242). London, UK: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farjoun, M. (2010). Beyond dualism: Stability and change as a duality. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 202–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. D. (2005). An empirical investigation into the power behind empowerment. Organization Management Journal, 2(3), 144–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedberg, B., Nystrom, P., & Starbuck, W. H. (1976). Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self designing organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I., & Linstone, H. A. (1993). The unbounded mind: Breaking the chains of traditional business thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinsky, A. L. (1999). Sanding down the edges paradoxical impediments to organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 35(1), 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, I., & Dunford, R. (2002). Out with the old and in with the new? The relationship between traditional and new organizational practices. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 10(3), 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M., & Fenton, E. M. (2000). Complexities and dualities in innovative forms of organizing. In A. M. Pettigrew & E. M. Fenton (Eds.), The innovative organization (pp. 279–300). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M., Whittington, R. L., Melin, L., Sanchez-Runde, C., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., Ruigrok, W., et al. (2003). Innovative forms of organizing. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. S. (1988). Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salem, P. (2002). Assessment, change, and complexity. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(3), 442–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Runde, C. J., & Pettigrew, A. M. (2003). Managing dualities. In A. M. Pettigrew, R. L. Whittington, L. Melin, C. Sanchez-Runde, F. A. J. Van Den Bosch, W. Ruigrok, & T. Numagami (Eds.), Innovative forms of organizing (pp. 243–250). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stace, D., & Dunphy, D. (2001). Beyond the boundaries: Leading and recreating the successful enterprise (2nd ed.). Sydney: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron C. T. Smith .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, A.C.T., Sutherland, F., Gilbert, D.H. (2017). The Efficient Innovator. In: Reinventing Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57213-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics