Abstract
This paper is an initial report on an interdisciplinary project regarding an integrated methodology for analyzing architectural heritage damaged by earthquake, combining 3D survey, critical survey and virtual reconstruction. The case study using this methodology was Retrosi, in the municipality of Amatrice (RI), Italy, damaged by earthquakes on August 24th and on October 30th, 2016. Researchers from different disciplines (Representation, Restoration, Building Science), worked together to obtain an analytical understanding of the building criticalities caused by the earthquakes. The method is based on a semantic model linked to a database in which specific building elements, constructive, structural, masonry types etc. are classified as data, that includes instabilities and damages.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the International II level Master’s degree, the Design Workshop is conducted by: Francesco Giovanetti, Michele Zampilli (coordinators), Paola Brunori, Chiara Cortesi, Francesca Geremia, Marco Grimaldi, Francesca Romana Stabile. The Survey Workshop is conducted by: Marco Canciani, Giovanna Spadafora, Mauro Saccone.
References
Canciani M, Spadafora G (2014) Differenze metodologiche nel rilevamento 3D, in archeologia e in architettura. In: Italian Survey & International Experience. Proceedings of 36° Convegno Internazionale dei Docenti della Rappresentazione, Parma, 18–20 settembre 2014. Gangemi, Roma. ISBN 9788849229158
Guidi G, Remondino F, Russo M (2011) Principali tecniche e strumenti per il rilievo tridimensionale in ambito archeologico. In: Archeologia e Calcolatori, vol XXII. Edizioni All’Insegna del Giglio, Roma, pp 169–198
Francovich R, Parenti R (1988) Archeologia e restauro dei monumenti, ciclo di lezioni sulla ricerca applicata all’archeologia. Certosa di Pontignano (Siena), 28 settembre–10 ottobre 1987. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Archeologia e Storia delle Arti. Sezione Archeologica. Università di Siena, Siena, p 480
Remondino F, Campana, S (2014) 3D Modeling in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Theory and Best Practices. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford, p 174. ISBN 9781407312309
De Luca L, Busayarat C, Stefani C, Véron P, Florenzano M (2011) A semantic-based platform for the digital analysis of architectural heritage. Comput. Graph. 35:227–241
Canciani M, Chiappetta F, Falcolini C, Michelini M, Pastor Altaba, Saccone M, Scortecci M (2017) A methodology for virtual reconstruction at different scale: environmental, architectural and artistic heritage. The Virtue of Models 2.0. Heidelberg University Publishing, Heidelberg
Lo Monaco M (1966) La Conca dell’Amatrice fra Marche, Abruzzo e Lazio. Pubblicazioni dell’Istituto di Geografia Economica della facoltà di Economia dell’Università di Roma, Roma, p 54
Imponente A, Torlontano R (2015) Amatrice: forme e immagini del territorio. Electa, Milano, p 163. ISBN 9788837094300
Massimi A (1958) Amatrice e le sue ville. Notizie storiche. Alfredo Aniballi, Ancona, p 160
Cangi G (2012) Manuale del recupero strutturale e antisismico. DEI, Roma, p 25. EAN: 9788849604399
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Canciani, M., Spadafora, G., Farroni, L., Mancini, M.F., Rinalduzzi, S., Saccone, M. (2018). Methodology of Analysis and Virtual Recomposition: The Case of Retrosi, Amatrice. In: Amoruso, G. (eds) Putting Tradition into Practice: Heritage, Place and Design. INTBAU 2017. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering , vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57937-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57937-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57936-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57937-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)