Skip to main content

The Challenges and Opportunities for Higher Education Institutions at the Science–Policy Interface

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change Research at Universities

Abstract

As one of the major ‘producers’ of climate change research, higher education institutions have had a key role to play in getting the climate change on the policy agenda. As the call for action on climate change intensifies, researchers within institutions will face new demands, with new challenges and opportunities, to inform policy to support both mitigation and adaptation. However, the uncertain, complex and interdisciplinary nature of climate change as an issue, combined with the inevitably highly politicised context of climate change action, means that involvement with policy will have a number of potential pitfalls. This paper draws lessons from recent research into the role of science within water resource management, to consider the challenges and opportunities higher institutions might face at the science–policy interface for climate change research. It notes that simply providing knowledge might be limited by uncertainty and politicisation, and suggests that collaborative, co-learning approaches might be more useful. Such approaches will require resource intensive interactions between scientists and stakeholders, as well as suitable governance arrangements. However, the paper argues that this focus on collaboration provides opportunities and could have multiple benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some of the results of this study have already been published where further details on the study can be found (Morgan and Grant-Smith 2015; Morgan and Osborne 2016).

References

  • Ball, S. J. (2012). Performativity, Commodification and Commitment: An I-Spy Guide to the Neoliberal University. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 17–28. doi:10.1080/00071005.2011.650940

  • Bauer, A., Feichtinger, J., & Steurer, R. (2011). The governance of climate change adaptation in ten OECD countries : Challenges and approaches. Institute of Forest, Environmental and Natural Resource Policy: Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, C. (2007). What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas?: a theoretical overview. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(6), 512–525. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.02.007

  • Clemencon, R. (2016). The Two Sides of the Paris Climate Agreement: Dismal Failure or Historic Breakthrough? The Journal of Environment & Development, 25(1), 3–24. doi:10.1177/1070496516631362

  • Collins, K., & Ison, R. (2009). Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(6), 358–373. doi:10.1002/eet.523

  • Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S. A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R., Jacobs P., Skuce, A. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8(2), 24024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024

  • Cottingham, R., Delfau, K. F., & Garde, P. (2010). Managing diffuse water pollution in South East Queensland An analysis of the role of the Healthy Waterways Partnership. Brisbane: International Water Centre

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, P. T., & Zimmerman, M. K. (2009). Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. Eos, 90(3), 22–23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009EO030002

  • Dowling, R. (2008). Geographies of identity: labouring in the “neoliberal” university. Progress in Human Geography, 32(6), 812–820. doi:10.1177/0309132507088032

  • Durose, C., & Rummery, K. (2006). Governance and Collaboration: Review Article. Social Policy and Society, 5(02), 315. doi:10.1017/S147474640500299X

  • Fuller, S. (2000). The governance of science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2009). Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. J. (2012, May 4). The “impact” of research carries weight (but ripples matter more). The Conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/the-impact-of-research-carries-weight-but-ripples-matter-more-6820

  • Grundmann, R. (2002). Transnational policy networks and the role of advocacy scientists: from ozone layer protection to climate change. Proceedings of the 2001 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change “Global Environmental Change and the Nation State, 405–414. Retrieved from http://eprints.aston.ac.uk/1496/

  • Grundmann, R. (2007). Climate change and knowledge politics. Environmental Politics, 16(3), 414–432. doi:10.1080/09644010701251656

  • Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26(4), 399–408. doi:10.1177/016224390102600401

  • Head, B. W. (2008). Three Lenses of Evidence-Based Policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(1), 1–11. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00564.x

  • Head, B. W. (2010). Water policy—Evidence, learning and the governance of uncertainty. Policy and Society, 29(2), 171–180. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.007

  • Hoppe, R. (2010). From “knowledge use” towards “boundary work”. Sketch of an emerging new agenda for inquiry into science-policy interaction. In R. J. in’t Veld (Ed.), Knowledge Democracy. Consequences for Science, Politics and Media (pp. 169–186). Heidleberg: Springer. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/robert_hoppe1/15

  • Hoppe, R., Wesselink, A., & Cairns, R. (2013). Lost in the problem: The role of boundary organisations in the governance of climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(4), 283–300. doi:10.1002/wcc.225

  • IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (R. K. Pachauri & L. A. Meyer, Eds.). Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javey, A. (2012). Measuring academic impact. ACS Nano, 6(8), 6529. doi:10.1021/nn303711b

  • Kasperson, R. (2011). Characterizing the Science/Practice Gap. In R. Kasperson & M. Berberian (Eds.), Integrating Science and Policy (pp. 3–22). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellow, A. (2007). Science and Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lackey, R. T. (2007). Science, scientists, and policy advocacy. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 21(1), 12–17. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00639.x

  • Landry, R., Amara, N., & Lamari, M. (2001). Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada. Research Policy, 30(2), 333–349. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00081-0

  • Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E., & Griffith, R. (2010). Governance Principles for Natural Resource Management. Society & Natural Resources, 23(10), 986–1001. doi:10.1080/08941920802178214

  • Lovbrand, E., & Oberg, G. (2005). Comment on “How science makes environmental controversies worse” by Daniel Sarewitz, Environmental Science and Policy, 7, 385–403 and “When Scientists politicise science: making sense of the controversy over The Skeptical Environmentalist” by Roger A. Pielke Jr., Environmental Science and Policy, 7, 405–417. Environmental Science & Policy, 8(2), 195–197. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.12.007

  • Mackenzie, J., Tan, P.-L., Hoverman, S., & Baldwin, C. (2012). The value and limitations of Participatory Action Research methodology. Journal of Hydrology, 474, 11–21. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.008

  • May, B., & Plummer, R. (2011). Accommodating the Challenges of Climate Change Adaptation and Governance in Conventional Risk Management: Adaptive Collaborative Risk Management (ACRM). Ecology And Society, 16(1), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S. (2009). Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(7), 994–1011. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2009.05.002

  • Miller, C. (2001). Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26(4), 478–500. doi:10.1177/016224390102600405

  • Morgan, E. A. (2014). Science & Sustainability: The Use of Science and the Science–Policy Interface in Sustainable Water Resource Management. Griffith University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, E. A., & Cole-Hawthorne, R. (2016). Applying a shared understanding between Aboriginal and Western knowledge to challenge unsustainable neo-liberal planning policy and practice. Australian Planner, 53(1), 54–62. doi:10.1080/07293682.2015.1135815

  • Morgan, E. A., & Grant-Smith, D. C. C. (2015). Tales of science and defiance: the case for co-learning and collaboration in bridging the science/emotion divide in water recycling debates. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(10), 1770–1788. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.954691

  • Morgan, E. A., & Osborne, N. (2016). It’s the Lungfish, Stupid: Knowledge Fights, Activism, and the Science-Policy Interface. Geographical Research, n/a–n/a. doi:10.1111/1745-5871.12181

  • Morrison, T. H. (2007). Multiscalar Governance and Regional Environmental Management in Australia. Space and Polity, 11(3), 227–241. doi:10.1080/13562570701811551

  • Morrison, T. H., McDonald, G. T., & Lane, M. B. (2004). Integrating Natural Resource Management for Better Environmental Outcomes. Australian Geographer, 35(3), 243–258. doi:10.1080/0004918042000311304

  • Oreskes, N. (2004). Science and public policy: what’s proof got to do with it? Environmental Science & Policy, 7(5), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.002

  • Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2011). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J., & Crona, B. (2012). All things to all people: Boundary organizations and the contemporary research university. Social Studies of Science, 42(2), 262–289. doi:10.1177/0306312711435833

  • Pelling, M., O’Brien, K., & Matyas, D. (2015). Adaptation and transformation. Climatic Change, 133(1), 113–127. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1303-0

  • Pielke Jr, R. A. (2004). When scientists politicize science: making sense of controversy over The Skeptical Environmentalist. Environmental Science & Policy, 7(5), 405–417. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.004

  • Pielke Jr, R. A. (2007). The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/0S0008423908080992

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding Governance: Ten Years On. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264. doi:10.1177/0170840607076586

  • Rijke, J., Brown, R., Zevenbergen, C., Ashley, R., Farrelly, M., Morison, P., & van Herk, S. (2012). Fit-for-purpose governance: A framework to make adaptive governance operational. Environmental Science and Policy, 22, 73–84. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.010

  • Sarewitz, D. R. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science & Policy, 7(5), 385–403. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001

  • Slob, A. F. L., Rijnveld, M., Chapman, A. S., & Strosser, P. (2007). Challenges of linking scientific knowledge to river basin management policy: AquaTerra as a case study. Environmental Pollution, 148(3), 867–74. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.01.048

  • Spruijt, P., Knol, A. B., Vasileiadou, E., Devilee, J., Lebret, E., & Petersen, A. C. (2014). Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: A literature review. Environmental Science & Policy, 40, 16–25. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.03.002

  • Steyaert, P., & Jiggins, J. (2007). Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM’s lessons for research, policy and practice. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(6), 575–586. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2007.01.011

  • Turnhout, E., Stuiver, M., Klostermann, J., Harms, B., & Leeuwis, C. (2013). New roles of science in society: Different repertoires of knowledge brokering. Science and Public Policy, 40(3), 354–365. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs114

  • van Buuren, A., & Edelenbos, J. (2004). Conflicting knowledge: Why is joint knowledge production such a problem? Science and Public Policy, 31(4), 289–299. Retrieved from http://repub.eur.nl/pub/1651/

  • van den Hove, S. (2007). A rationale for science-policy interfaces. Futures, 39(7), 807–826. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.004

  • Wanna, J. (2008). Collaborative government: meanings, dimensions, drivers and outcomes. In J. O’Flynn & J. Wanna (Eds.), Collaborative governance: a new era of public policy in Australia? (pp. 3–13). Acton, A.C.T: ANU E Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehrens, R., Bekker, M., & Bal, R. (2014). Hybrid Management Configurations in Joint Research. Science, Technology & Human Values, 39(1), 6–41. doi:10.1177/0162243913497807

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward A. Morgan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morgan, E.A. (2017). The Challenges and Opportunities for Higher Education Institutions at the Science–Policy Interface. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Climate Change Research at Universities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58214-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics