Skip to main content

Selecting What? Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening Trajectories in Spain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century

Abstract

Based on research conducted in Spain, this chapter follows the narratives of 21 women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with prenatal genetic diagnosis or screening (PGD/PGS). The analysis shows that there exist relevant differences between the experiences associated with these techniques and their related medicalization process. While the trajectory of women undergoing PGD for chromosome translocations or miscarriages resembles the PGS trajectory, women undergoing PGD in order to have offspring free of a specific genetic condition follow a different trajectory. While selection is always at work, the experience of it may vary significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adeces. 2015. Técnicas de Reproducción Asistida La necesidad de invertir, 1–50. Madrid: Asociación pro Derechos Civiles, Económicos y Sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, Marcelo Palacios. 2005. Ley Sobre Técnicas De Reproducción Asistida (35/88): De 1988 a 2005. In Estudios Jurídico-Penales Sobre Genética Y Biomedicina: Libro-Homenaje Al Prof. Dr. D. Ferrando Mantovani, ed. Carlos Aránguez Sánchez and Carlos M. Romeo Casabona, 33–69. Madrid: Dykinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arribas-Ayllon, Michael, Srikant Sarangi, and Angus Clarke. 2013. Genetic Testing: Accounts of Autonomy, Responsibility and Blame. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, Sven. 2014. Fertility Tourism: Circumventive Routes that Enable Access to Reproductive Technologies and Substances. Signs 40 (1): 280–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumiller, Kristin. 2009. The Geneticization of Autism: From New Reproductive Technologies to the Conception of Genetic Normalcy. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 34 (4): 875–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bumiller, Kristin. 2014. The Geneticization of Autism: From New Reproductive Technologies to the Conception of Genetic Normalcy. Signs 40 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunton, Robin, and Alan Petersen. 2005. Genetics and Governance. Genetic Governance 18: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castiel, Luis David, Maria Cristina Rodrigues Guilam, Paulo Roberto Vasconcellos-Silva, and Javier Sanz-Valero. 2006. Genomic Risk and Personal Responsibility in Health. Revista Panamericana de Salúd Publica 19 (3): 189–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele E. 2003. Biomedicalization. In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele E., Janet K. Shim, Laura Mamo, Jennifer Ruth Fosket, and Jennifer R. Fishman. 2010. Biomedicalization: Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and US Biomedicine. In Biomedicalization: Technoscience, Health, and Illness in the US, ed. Adele E. Clarke, Janet K. Shim, Laura Mamo, Jennifer Ruth Fosket, and Jennifer R. Fishman, 47–87. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Biomedicalization: Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and U.S. Biomedicine. American Sociological Review 68: 161–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. 2013. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cussins, Charis. 1996. Ontological Choreography: Agency Through Objectification in Infertility Clinics. Social Studies of Science 26 (3): 575–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazba, Kathryn T., Michele A. Kelley, and Patricia E. Hershberger. 2014. A Qualitative Inquiry of the Financial Concerns of Couples Opting to Use Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis to Prevent the Transmission of Known Genetic Disorders. Journal of Genetic Counseling 23 (2): 202–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrich, Kathryn, and Clare Williams. 2010. A ‘Healthy Baby’: The Double Imperative of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Health 14 (1): 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrich, Kathryn, Clare Williams, Bobbie Farsides, Jane Sandall, and Rosamund Scott. 2007. Choosing Embryos: Ethical Complexity and Relational Autonomy in Staff Accounts of PGD. Sociology of Health and Illness 29 (7): 1091–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkler, Kaja. 2011. Experiencing the New Genetics: Family and Kinship on the Medical Frontier. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S. 2006. The IVF-Stem Cell Interface. International Journal of Surgery (London, England) 4 (2): 86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Sarah, and Celia Roberts. 2006. Born and Made: An Ethnography of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S., C. Roberts, K. Throsby, P. Braude, J. Shaw, A. Lashwood, and S. Pickering. 2005. Factors Affecting PGD Patients’ Consent to Donate Embryos to Stem Cell Research. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 10: 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friese, Carrie, Gay Becker, and Robert D. Nachtigall. 2006. Rethinking the Biological Clock: Eleventh-Hour Moms, Miracle Moms and Meanings of Age-Related Infertility. Social Science and Medicine 63 (6): 1550–1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gammeltoft, Tine M., and Ayo Wahlberg. 2014. Selective Reproductive Technologies. Annual Review of Anthropology 43: 201–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gianaroli, Luca, Anna Maria Crivello, Ilaria Stanghellini, Anna Pia Ferraretti, Carla Tabanelli, and Maria Cristina Magli. 2014. Reiterative Changes in the Italian Regulation on IVF: The Effect on PGD Patients’ Reproductive Decisions. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 28 (1): 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, Joaquín Jiménez. 2014. ¿ Es necesario un acuerdo internacional en torno al diagnóstico genético preimplantacional (DGP)? Bioderecho.es: Revista internacional de investigación en Bioderecho 1 (1): 88–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardarson, T., C. Hanson, K. Lundin, T. Hillensjö, L. Nilsson, J. Stevic, E. Reismer, K. Borg, M. Wikland, and C. Bergh. 2008. Preimplantation Genetic Screening in Women of Advanced Maternal Age Caused a Decrease in Clinical Pregnancy Rate: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Human Reproduction 23 (12): 2806–2812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershberger, Patricia E., Agatha M. Gallo, Karen Kavanaugh, Ellen Olshansky, Alan Schwartz, and Ilan Tur-Kaspa. 2012. The Decision-Making Process of Genetically At-Risk Couples Considering Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Initial Findings from a Grounded Theory Study. Social Science and Medicine 74 (10): 1536–1543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, Søren. 2009. The Medicalization of Reproduction—A 30 Year Retrospective. In Reprogen-Ethics and the Future of Gender, ed. Frida Simonstein, 29–36. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Järvholm, Stina, Malin Broberg, and Ann Thurin-Kjellberg. 2014. The Choice of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD), a Qualitative Study Among Men and Women. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 32 (1): 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalfoglou, Andrea L., Joan Scott, and Kathy Hudson. 2005. PGD Patients’ and Providers’ Attitudes to the Use and Regulation of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 11 (4): 486–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karatas, J.C., K. Barlow-Stewart, B. Meiser, C. McMahon, K.A. Strong, W. Hill, C. Roberts, and P. Kelly. 2010. Psychological Adjustment, Knowledge and Unmet Information Needs in Women Undergoing Pgd. Human Reproduction 25 (6): 1481–1489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krahn, Timothy, and Sophia Isako Wong. 2009. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Reproductive Autonomy. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 19: 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupka, M.S., A.P. Ferraretti, J. de Mouzon, K. Erb, T. D’Hooghe, J.A. Castilla, C. Calhaz-Jorge, C. De Geyter, and V. Goossens. 2014. Assisted Reproductive Technology in Europe, 2010: Results Generated from European Registers by ESHRE. Human Reproduction 29 (10): 2099–2113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavery, S.A., R. Aurell, C. Turner, C. Castello, Anna Veiga, Pedro N. Barri, and R.M. Winston. 2002. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Patients’ Experiences and Attitudes. Human Reproduction 17 (9): 2464–2467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., and G.B. Rossman. 2011. Designing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastenbroek, Sebastiaan, Moniek Twisk, Jannie van Echten-Arends, Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz, Johanna C. Korevaar, Harold R. Verhoeve, Niels E.A. Vogel, Eus G.J.M. Arts, Jan W.A. De Vries, and Patrick M. Bossuyt. 2007. In Vitro Fertilization with Preimplantation Genetic Screening. New England Journal of Medicine 357 (1): 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClaren, Anne. 1987. Can We Diagnose Genetic Disease in Pre-Embryos? New Scientist 116 (1590): 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, Francisco Javier Jiménez. 2012. La reproducción asistida y su régimen jurídico. Madrid: Editorial Reus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormondroyd, Elizabeth, Louise Donnelly, Clare Moynihan, Cornelie Savona, Elizabeth Bancroft, D. Gareth Evans, Rosalind Eeles, Stuart Lavery, and Maggie Watson. 2012. Attitudes to Reproductive Genetic Testing in Women Who had a Positive BRCA Test Before Having Children: A Qualitative Analysis. European Journal of Human Genetics 20 (1): 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overall, Christine. 2012. Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavone, V., and F. Arias. 2012. Beyond the Geneticization Thesis: The Political Economy of PGD/PGS in Spain. Science, Technology and Human Values 37 (3): 235–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pehlivan, Tugce, C. Rubio, L. Rodrigo, J. Romero, J. Remohi, C. Simon, and A. Pellicer. 2003. Impact of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis on IVF Outcome in Implantation Failure Patients. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 6 (2): 232–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, Guido. 2002. Reproductive Tourism as Moral Pluralism in Motion. Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (6): 337–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. 1997. Discourse Analysis as a Way of Interpreting Naturally-Occurring Talk. In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, ed. D. Silverman, 144–160. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pownall, Holly. 2013. Neoliberalism, Austerity and the Health and Social Care Act 2012: The Coalition Government’s Programme for the NHS and its Implications for the Public Sector Workforce. Industrial Law Journal 42 (4): dwt016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Celia, and Sarah Franklin. 2004. Experiencing New Forms of Genetic Choice: Findings from an Ethnographic Study of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Human Fertility 7 (4): 285–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, Barbara Katz. 2001. The Book of Life: A Personal and Ethical Guide to Race, Normality, and the Implications of the Human Genome Project. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruckert, Arne, Ronald Labonté, and Rylan H. Parker. 2015. Global Healthcare Policy and the Austerity Agenda. In The Palgrave International Handbook of Healthcare Policy and Governance, ed. E. Kuhlmann, R.H. Blank, I.L. Bourgeault, and C. Wendt, 37. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salama, M. 2014. Cross Border Reproductive Care (CBRC): A Global Perspective. Obstetrics and Gynecology International Journal 1 (2): 00008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEF. 2013. Registro de la Sociedad Española de Fertilidad: Técnicas de reproducción asistida (IA y FIV/ICSI), 1–41. Madrid: Sociedad Española de Fertilidad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen, M.N., and L. Koch. 2008. Unpacking the ‘Spare Embryo’. Social Studies of Science 38 (1): 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rij, Maartje C., Marij Gielen, Rutger Lulofs, Johannes L.H. Evers, Liesbeth van Osch, Nienke Muntjewerff, Joep P.M. Geraedts, and Christine E.M. de Die-Smulders. 2011. Profiles and Motives for PGD: A Prospective Cohort Study of Couples Referred for PGD in the Netherlands. Human Reproduction 26 (7): 1826–1835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg, Ayo. 2016. The Birth and Routinisation of IVF in China. Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online 2: 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeiler, Kristin. 2004. Reproductive Autonomous Choice—A Cherished Illusion? Reproductive Autonomy Examined in the Context of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (2): 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pavone, V., Funes, S.L. (2018). Selecting What? Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening Trajectories in Spain. In: Wahlberg, A., Gammeltoft, T. (eds) Selective Reproduction in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58220-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58220-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-58219-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-58220-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics