Abstract
The Code of Medical Ethics recently published by the American Medical Association (AMA, Code of medical ethics. Chicago, IL: AMA, 2017) is meant for medical practice, generally, but it applies to work in psychiatry specifically, as well. The chapter examines in depth the AMA medical ethics code while offering commentary and applications toward the revision of the APA (American Psychological Association, American Psychologists, 57, 1060–1073, 2002; Ibid., Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, 2010; Ibid., American Psychologist, 71, 900, 2016) ethics code. The standards/opinions are described better in the AMA code relative to the APA code, and they are reviewed in this chapter of the book, with recommendations for their change noted. Moreover, the AMA ethics code qualifies the standards/opinions as must, should, or may ones, i.e., for the degree to which they are mandatory, or at least the code aims for this goal. The most notable contribution of the AMA medical ethics code to the present endeavor toward revising the APA ethics code is its inclusion of a section on patient rights. A major advantage of the AMA ethics code relative to any other in mental health is that it includes an extensive annotated bibliography for each of its standards/opinions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Medical Association. (2017). Code of medical ethics. Chicago, IL: Author.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologists, 57, 1060–1073.
American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, Amended June 1, 2010). Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf
American Psychological Association. (2016). Revision of ethical standard 3.04 of the “ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct” (2002, as Amended 2010). American Psychologist, 71, 900.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2012). Principle of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Brotherton, S., Kao, A., & Crigger, B. J. (2016). Professing the values of medicine: The modernized AMA code of medical ethics. JAMA, 316, 1041–1042.
Gauthier, J., & Pettifor, J. L. (2012). The tale of two universal declarations: Ethics and human rights. In M. M. Leach, M. J. Stevens, G. Lindsay, A. Ferrero, & Y. Korkut (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international psychological ethics (pp. 113–133). New York: Oxford University Press.
Siegler, M. (2017). Forward. In American Medical Association (Ed.), Code of medical ethics (pp. vii–vix). Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.
Walsh, R. T. G. (2015a). Introduction to ethics in psychology: Historical and philosophical grounding. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 35, 69–77.
Walsh, R. T. G. (2015b). Bending the arc of North American psychologists’ moral universe toward communicative ethics and social justice. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 35, 90–102.
Young, G. (2016). Unifying causality and psychology: Being, brain, and behavior. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Young, G. (2017). Lessons from the 2017 AMA Medical Ethics Code. In: Revising the APA Ethics Code. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60002-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60002-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60001-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60002-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)