Skip to main content

Lessons from the 2017 AMA Medical Ethics Code

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Revising the APA Ethics Code
  • 996 Accesses

Abstract

The Code of Medical Ethics recently published by the American Medical Association (AMA, Code of medical ethics. Chicago, IL: AMA, 2017) is meant for medical practice, generally, but it applies to work in psychiatry specifically, as well. The chapter examines in depth the AMA medical ethics code while offering commentary and applications toward the revision of the APA (American Psychological Association, American Psychologists, 57, 1060–1073, 2002; Ibid., Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct, 2010; Ibid., American Psychologist, 71, 900, 2016) ethics code. The standards/opinions are described better in the AMA code relative to the APA code, and they are reviewed in this chapter of the book, with recommendations for their change noted. Moreover, the AMA ethics code qualifies the standards/opinions as must, should, or may ones, i.e., for the degree to which they are mandatory, or at least the code aims for this goal. The most notable contribution of the AMA medical ethics code to the present endeavor toward revising the APA ethics code is its inclusion of a section on patient rights. A major advantage of the AMA ethics code relative to any other in mental health is that it includes an extensive annotated bibliography for each of its standards/opinions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Medical Association. (2017). Code of medical ethics. Chicago, IL: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologists, 57, 1060–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, Amended June 1, 2010). Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf

  • American Psychological Association. (2016). Revision of ethical standard 3.04 of the “ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct” (2002, as Amended 2010). American Psychologist, 71, 900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2012). Principle of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brotherton, S., Kao, A., & Crigger, B. J. (2016). Professing the values of medicine: The modernized AMA code of medical ethics. JAMA, 316, 1041–1042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, J., & Pettifor, J. L. (2012). The tale of two universal declarations: Ethics and human rights. In M. M. Leach, M. J. Stevens, G. Lindsay, A. Ferrero, & Y. Korkut (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international psychological ethics (pp. 113–133). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler, M. (2017). Forward. In American Medical Association (Ed.), Code of medical ethics (pp. vii–vix). Chicago, IL: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R. T. G. (2015a). Introduction to ethics in psychology: Historical and philosophical grounding. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 35, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R. T. G. (2015b). Bending the arc of North American psychologists’ moral universe toward communicative ethics and social justice. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 35, 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (2016). Unifying causality and psychology: Being, brain, and behavior. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Young, G. (2017). Lessons from the 2017 AMA Medical Ethics Code. In: Revising the APA Ethics Code. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60002-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics