Abstract
Within the broader debate about media and politics, a remarkable observation is that journalists and politicians evaluate the size of the political influence of the media fundamentally differently. While politicians tend to emphasize the strong influence of media over their work, journalists tend to downplay this impact. This chapter discusses and empirically tests several explanations for this gap in perceptions. Derived from literature on mediatization, journalistic role perceptions, and political agenda setting, several explanations are put forward. Based on existing comparative surveys with journalists and politicians, and some additional additionally in-depth interviews with Dutch and Danish politicians and journalists, this chapter investigates how we can explain these different evaluations of the political power of the media.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altheide, D., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media logic. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Cappella, J., & Jamieson, K. (1997). The spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cook, T. E. (2005). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202.
Esser, F. (2013). Mediatization as a challenge: Media logic versus political logic. In Democracy in the age of globalization and mediatization (pp. 155–176). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Esser, F., & Strömbäck, J. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Esser, F., Reinemann, C., & Fan, D. P. (2001). Spin doctors in the United States, Great Britain and Germany. Metacommunication about media manipulation. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 6(1), 16–45.
Fengler, S., & Ruß-Mohl, S. (2008). Journalists and the information-attention markets: Towards an economic theory of journalism. Journalism, 9(6), 667–690.
Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R. (2010). The political conditionality of mass media. When do parties follow mass media attention? British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 663–677.
Hanitzsch, T. (2011). Populist disseminators, detached watchdogs, critical change agents and opportunist facilitators: Professional milieus, the journalistic field and autonomy in 18 countries. International Communication Gazette, 73(6), 477–494.
Helfer, L. (2016). Media effects on politicians; An individual-level political agenda-setting experiment. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 21(2), 233–252.
Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hopmann, D., Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2015). Contagious media effects: How media use and exposure to game-framed news influence media trust. Mass Communication & Society, 18(6), 776–798.
Jacobs, K., & Spierings, N. (2016). Social media, parties, and political inequalities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Janowitz, M. (1975). Professional models in journalism: The gatekeeper and the advocate. Journalism Quarterly, 52(4), 218–226, 262.
Johnstone, J. W. C., Slawski, E. J., & Bowman, W. W. (1972–1973). The professional values of American newsmen. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(4), 522–540.
Kaplan, R. L. (2006). The news about new institutionalism: Journalism’s ethic of objectivity and its political origins. Political Communication, 23(2), 173–185.
McNair, B. (1998). The sociology of journalism. London: Arnold.
McQuail, D. (2005). Mass communication theory (5th ed.). London: Sage.
O’Neill, D., & Harcup, T. (2009). News values and selectivity. In K. Wahl-Jørgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 161–174). London: Routledge.
Patterson, T. E. (1998). The political roles of the journalist. In D. Graber, D. McQuail, & P. Norris (Eds.), The politics of news; The news of politics (pp. 23–39). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Skovsgaard, M., Albæk, E., Bro, P., & de Vreese, C. (2013). A reality check: How journalists’ role perceptions impact their implementation of the objectivity norm. Journalism, 14(1), 22–42.
Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331–345.
Strömbäck, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2013). Why political parties adapt to the media: Exploring the fourth dimension of mediatization. International Communication Gazette, 75(4), 341–358.
Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), 660–679.
Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2016). Information and arena: The dual function of the news media for political elites. Journal of Communication, 66(3), 496–518.
Van Aelst, P., Shehata, A., & Van Dalen, A. (2010). Members of parliament: Equal competitors for media attention? An analysis of personal contacts between MPs and political journalists in five European countries. Political Communication, 27(3), 310–325.
Vliegenthart, R., Walgrave, S., Baumgartner, F. R., Bevan, S., Breunig, C., Brouard, S., et al. (2016). Do the media set the parliamentary agenda? A comparative study in seven countries. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 283–301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vliegenthart, R., Skovsgaard, M. (2017). Too Powerful or Just Doing Their Job? Explaining Differences in Conceptions of Media Power Among Politicians and Journalists. In: Van Aelst, P., Walgrave, S. (eds) How Political Actors Use the Media. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60249-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60249-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60248-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60249-3
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)