Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Constructing the Urban Citizen: How Public Knowledge Is Translated into Urban Planning Processes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Relational Planning

Abstract

Public consultation has been established as a legally mandatory step in land use planning processes in most Western societies. Recent trends point to a growing interest to exceed this mandatory format and to engage citizens at a wide variety of ways. Using Irwin’s (Public Understanding of Science 10 (1): 1–18, 2001) concept of the “scientific citizen”, this chapter draws parallels between science and planning with regard to public engagement. Empirical material from two case studies is used to trace the construction of the “urban citizen” in two public engagement approaches. As a conclusion, it is argued that the framing of the urban citizen in certain public engagement approaches is not necessarily related to their democratic qualities or deliberative deficits in the translation of public knowledge into urban planning processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bodmer, W.S., et al. 1985. The Public Understanding of Science. London: The Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogner, Alexander, and Wolfgang Menz. 2009. Experteninterviews: Theorien, Methoden, Anwendungsfelder. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabham, Daren C. 2009. Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects. Planning Theory 8 (3): 242–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilvers, Jason, and Matthew Kearnes. 2016. Science, Democracy and Emergent Publics. In Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics, ed. J. Chilvers and Matthew Kearnes, 1–28. London and New York: Earthscan-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullingworth, Barry J. 1993. The Political Culture of Planning: American Land Use Planning in Comparative Perspective. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Sarah R., Cynthia Selin, Gretchen Gano, and Ângela Guimarães Pereira. 2012. Citizen Engagement and Urban Change: Three Case Studies of Material Deliberation. Cities 29: 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Solla Price, Derek J. 1967. Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Die Presse. 2014. Stadtentwicklung in Wien: Mehr Wohnraum. Die Presse, January 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R.M., R.I. Fretz, and L.L. Shaw. 2001. Participant Observation and Fieldnotes. In Handbook of Ethnography, ed. Paul Atkinson, Amanda Coffey, Sara Delamont, John Lofland, and Lyn Lofland. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, Robert M., Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw. 2011. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, Susan. 2000. New Directions in Planning Theory. Urban Affairs Review 35 (4): 451–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felt, Ulrike. 2016. The Temporal Choreographies of Participation: Thinking Innovation and Society from a Time-Sensitive Perspective. In Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics, ed. Jason Chilvers and Matthew Kearnes, 178–198. London and New York: Earthscan-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felt, Ulrike, Brian Wynne, Michel Callon, Maria Eduarda Gonçalves, Sheila Jasanoff, Maria Jepsen, Pierre-Benoît Joly, et al. 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Luxembourg: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felt, U., J. Igelsböck, A. Schikowitz, and T. Völker. 2012. Challenging Participation in Sustainability Research. International Journal of Deliberative Mechanisms in Science 1 (1): 4–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester, John. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove-White, Robin, Matthew Kearnes, Paul Miller, Phil Macnaghten, James Wilsdon, and Brian Wynne. 2004. Bio-to-Nano? Learning the Lessons, Interrogating the Comparison. A Working Paper by the Institute for Environment, Philosophy and Public Policy, Lancaster University and Demos. Lancaster: Demos/Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagendijk, Rob P. 2004. The Public Understanding of Science and Public Participation in Regulated Worlds. Minerva 42: 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagendijk, Rob, and Alan Irwin. 2006. Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe. Minerva 44: 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, Patsy. 1997. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Collaborative Planning in Perspective. Planning Theory 2 (2): 101–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hengartner, Thomas, and Anna Schindler, eds. 2014. Wachstumsschmerzen. Gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen der Stadtentwicklung und ihre Bedeutung für Zürich. Zürich: Seismo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hommels, Anique. 2005. Studying Obduracy in the City: Toward a Productive Fusion Between Technology Studies and Urban Studies. Science, Technology & Human Values 30 (3): 323–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Changing Obdurate Urban Objects: The Attempts to Reconstruct the Highway through Maastricht. In Urban Assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory Changes Urban Studies, ed. Ignacio Farias and Thomas Bender, 139–160. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, Alan. 2001. Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences. Public Understanding of Science 10 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. From Deficit to Democracy (Re-Visited). Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. On the Local Constitution of Global Futures: Science and Democratic Engagement in a Decentred World. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology 3 (2): 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, Alan, and Maja Horst. 2016. Engaging in a Decentred World: Overflows, Ambiguities and the Governance of Climate Change. In Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics, ed. Jason Chilvers and Matthew Kearnes, 64–80. London and New York: Earthscan-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, Alan, and Mike Michael. 2003. Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge. Maidenhead, Berks: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, Alan, and Brian Wynne. 1996. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Richard A.L. 2014. Reflecting on Public Engagement and Science Policy. Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karvonen, Andrew, and Bas van Heur. 2014. Urban Laboratories: Experiments in Reworking Cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (2): 379–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearnes, Matthew, Phil Macnaghten, and James Wilsdon. 2006. Governing at the Nanoscale. People, Policies and Emerging Technologies. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearnes, Matthew, and Brian Wynne. 2007. On Nanotechnology and Ambivalence: The Politics of Enthusiasm. Nanoethics 1 (2): 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamneck, Siegfried. 1995. Qualitative Sozialforschung: Band 2 Methoden und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauwaert, Maaike. 2009. Playing the City: Public Participation in a Contested Suburban Area. Journal of Urban Technology 16 (2): 143–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MA18. 2014a. STEP 2025: Stadtentwicklungsplan Wien. Vol. Beschlossen vom Wiener Gemeinderat am 25. Juni 2014. Wien: Magistratsabteilung der Stadt Wien, MA 18: Stadtentwicklung und Stadtplanung.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014b. Wien 2025: Im Dialog Stadt entwickeln. Eine Ausstellung in der Wiener Planungswerkstatt. Wien: Magistratsabteilung der Stadt Wien, MA 18: Stadtentwicklung und Stadtplanung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnaghten, Philipp, Matthew Kearnes, and Brian Wynne. 2005. Nanotechnology, Governance and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences. Science Communications 21 (2): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marres, Nortje. 2012. Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, Jonathan. 2011. Strange Spaces: A Rationale for Bringing Art and Artists into the Planning Process. Planning Theory 10 (3): 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michels, Christoph. 2010. Räume der Partizipation: Wie man ein Kunstmuseum inszeniert, St. Gallen. Bamberg: Difo-Druck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, Helga. 2014. Engaging with the Political Imaginaries of Science: Near Misses and Future Targets. Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 16–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NZZ. 2014a. Kritik an Revision der Zürcher Bau- und Zonenordnung: Architekten planen für den Papierkorb. Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ), February 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014b. Revidierte Bau- und Zonenordnung: Die wichtigsten Korrekturen. Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ), October 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014c. Zürcher Bau- und Zonenordnung: Zürichs Stadtrat krebst zurück. Neue Zürcher Zeitung (NZZ), October 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Othengrafen, Frank, and Martin Sondermann. 2015. Konflikte, Proteste, Initiativen und die Kultur der Planung—Stadtentwickung unter demokratischen Vorzeichen? In Städtische Planungskulturen im Spiegel von Konflikten, Protesten und Initiativen, ed. Frank Othengrafen and Martin Sondermann. Berlin: Planungsrundschau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rydin, Yvonne. 1999. Public Participation in Planning. In British Planning 50 Years of Urban and Regional Policy, ed. Barry Cullingworth, 184–197. London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Conflict, Consensus and Rationality in Environmental Planning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge within Planning Theory. Planning Theory 6 (1): 52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydin, Yvonne, and L.C. Natarajan. 2015. The Materiality of Public Participation: The Case of Community Consultation on Spatial Planning for North Northamptonshire, England. Local Environment. doi:10.1080/13549839.2015.1095718.

  • Sandercock, Leonie. 1998. Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. Chichester, UK and New York: J.Wiley Reprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, Oliver. 1999. Verhandlungsorientierte Verfahren in der Raumplanung. Zürich: Institut für Orts-, Regional- und Landesplanung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stadt Zürich. 2013. Wachsen, aber richtig. Öffentliche Auflage und Ausstellung zur Überarbeitung des regionalen Richtplans und zur Teilrevision der Bau- und Zonenordnung der Stadt Zürich. Zürich: Hochbaudepartement der Stadt Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Teilrevision der Bau- und Zonenordnung der Stadt Zürich, BZO 2014, Änderungen der Bauordnung (Synoptische Darstellung). Stadt Zürich: Hochbaudepartement, Amt für Städtebau (AfS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stilgoe, Jack, Simon J. Lock, and James Wilsdon. 2014. Why Should we Promote Public Engagement with Science? Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanquerel, Thierry. 1992. Les modalités d’intervention du public dans les choix d’aménagement : le point de vue du droit. In La négociation: son rôle, sa place dans l’aménagement du territoire et la protection de l’environnement, ed. Jean Ruegg, Nicolas Mettan, and Luc Vodoz, 59–78. Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasari, Bernd. 2015. Die große Neuordnung auf der Straße. Wiener Zeitung, February 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilsdon, James, and Rebecca Willis. 2004. See-Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: DEMOS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, Brian. 1995. Public Understanding of Science. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. Sheila Jasanoff, Gerald E. Markle, James C. Petersen, and Trevor Pinch, 361–388. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide. In Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, ed. Scott Lash, Bronislaw Szerszynski, and Bryan Wynne. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science: Hitting the Notes, But Missing the Music? Community Genetics 9: 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZH Lex LS 700.1. 1975. Kanton Zürich: Planungs- und Baugesetz (PBG) vom 7. September 1975.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research & Faculty, University of St.Gallen, St. Gallen, SG, Switzerland

    Monika Kurath

Authors
  1. Monika Kurath
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Monika Kurath

  2. ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Marko Marskamp

  3. ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Julio Paulos

  4. University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Jean Ruegg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kurath, M. (2018). Constructing the Urban Citizen: How Public Knowledge Is Translated into Urban Planning Processes. In: Kurath, M., Marskamp, M., Paulos, J., Ruegg, J. (eds) Relational Planning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60462-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60462-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60461-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60462-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation