Skip to main content

Mobile Urbanity in Southern Africa. The Socio-Spatial Practices of Informal Cross-Border Traders Between Johannesburg and Maputo

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Urban Development and Globalization

Part of the book series: Research for Development ((REDE))

  • 1325 Accesses

Abstract

The paper investigates the interplay between informality, mobility, and urban space in Sub-Saharan Africa, by focussing on the practices of the mukheristas, Mozambican informal cross-border traders. In the mukhero, informality and mobility intersect and constantly reshape each other, in a way that has turned a customary survival strategy into a phenomenon well-blended with the global logics underpinning contemporary urban processes. The mukheristas deploy movement across transnational distances as a livelihood strategy to overcome structural constraints and, by doing so, they interconnect translocal urban spaces and heterogeneous networks. By re-tracing their socio-spatial practices between Johannesburg and Maputo through a grounded-theory approach based on multi-sited ethnographic explorations, the paper tries to unfold crucial, but underestimated process pertaining to the constitution of the urban life in Sub-Saharan Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As E. explained to me: «The business in Brazil, China, and India is about this artificial hair. They go to buy in those countries. They make big profits from this business. It’s usually the youngest ones who do this. They are between 20 and 35 years old, the young generation of mukheristas working on a global scale. They transport hair squeezed in backpacks. It’s cheap, easy, and convenient. By doing this business for a few years, they manage to open saloons and buy houses in South Africa». (Extract from an interview done in June 2014, in Johannesburg).

  2. 2.

    Informal trade across large distances and borders is common and widespread in Africa and has recently been recognized as important by the Economic Commission for Africa, which has noted that informal cross-border trade is the main source of job creation in Africa, which provides between 20 and 75% of total employment in most of the countries.

  3. 3.

    Between 2004 and 2013, cross-border traffic from Mozambique to South African border towns and great cities has increased from around 400,000 to nearly 1.8 million documented entries per annum, also eased by the simpler procedures to access the country.

  4. 4.

    Female involvement in the practice started in colonial times, when women used to migrate with their husbands and has increased considerably since the civil war (1981–1994), when women used to go to the border zones in quest for food for their children and people while the men were fighting to become predominant nowadays. Women’s mobility has helped to scatter the rigid division of roles in the Mozambican society, marking the exit from their confinement within the household space, as well as the possibility of engaging with other socio-economic spheres. The mukhero has represented an essential tool for women’s emancipation and empowerment, as well as a particular driving force of socio-cultural change, especially in the urban contexts. While the informal economy still presents a significant gender gap, with women earning on average less than men, the mukhero allows women to accumulate more capital than men and it is not rare that women employ other men, with important implications on gender relationships.

  5. 5.

    ‘Mamanas’ is a moniker used for the oldest mukherista, implying dutiful respect for the age and the fortune accumulated over years of hard work, by cheering up from original conditions of extreme poverty.

  6. 6.

    The definition of the African middle class is difficult and controversial. It can be defined and subdivided on the basis of the data provided by ILO into three categories, named: “near poor” (2–4 USD/day), “emerging middle class”, (2–13 USD/day) and “middle class and above” (>13 USD/day).

References

  • Amin A (2004) Regulating economic globalization. Trans Inst Br Geogr 29(2):217–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin A, Thrift N (2005) Città. Ripensare la dimensione urbana. Il Mulino, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista-Lundin I, Taylor I (2003) A view from Maputo. In: Söderbaum F, Taylor I (eds) Regionalism and uneven development in Southern Africa: the case of maputo development Corridor. Ashgate, Burlington, pp 97–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreau-Tran L (2011) L’émergence économique des Mukheristas au Mozambique: quels impacts sur les relations de genre?. Dissertation, University Sciences Po-Bordeaux

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickell K, Datta A (2011) Translocal geographies. Ashgate, Furnham, Spaces, Places, Connections

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabal P (2009) Africa. La politica del soffrire.:duepunti edizioni, Palermo

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins FL (2011) Transnational mobilities and urban spatialities: notes from the Asia Pacific. Prog Hum Geogr 36(3):316–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosta PL (2010) Pratiche, il territorio è l’uso che se ne fa. FrancoAngeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Crush J, Skinner C and Chikanda A (2015) Informal migrant entrepreneurship and inclusive growth in South Africa, Zimbabwe and Mozambique. In: Crush J (ed) Southern African Migration Programme (SAMP). Migration Policy Series 68

    Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi S (2015) Planning as practice of knowing. Planning Theory 14(3):316–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Brujin M, van Dijk R, Foeken D (2001) Mobile Africa. Changing Patterns of Movement in Africa and Beyond, Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau M (1984) The practice of everyday life. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear M, Leclerc G (2003) Postborder city: cultural spaces of Bajalta California. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai M (2009) Women cross-border traders in africa: rethinking global trade. Development 52(3):377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doel MA (1999) Poststructuralist geographies: the diabolical art of spatial science. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald J (1995) The city, the cinema: modern spaces. In: Jenks C (ed) Visual Culture. Routledge, London, pp 77–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihato WK (2013) Migrant women of Johannesburg. Everyday life in an in-between city. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Landau L (forthcoming) Friendship fears and communities of convenience in Africa’s urban estuaries: disconnection as measure of urban condition

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (1977) Critica della vita quotidiana (Italian translation). Dedalo, Bari

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaquais D (2004) Douala/Johannesburg/New York: cityscapes imagined. Dark roast occasional paper series 20. Isandla Institute, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Manganhela A (2006) A influência do Mukhero nas receitas das alfândegas de Moçambique: o caso da fronteira de Namaacha (1987–2005). Dissertation, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus GE (1995) Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-Sited Ethnography. Annu Rev Anthropol 24:95–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus GE (2005) Multi-sited ethnography: five or six things i know about it now. In: Proceedings of the problems and possibilities in multi-sited ethnography workshop, University of Sussex, 27–28 June 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey D (1993) Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In: Bird J, Curtis B, Putnam T, Robertson G, Tickner L (eds) Mapping the futures: Local cultures, global change, Routledge, London,   pp 59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey D (2004) Geographies of responsibility. In: Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 86(1):5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller B, Ponto J (2016) Mobility among the spatialities. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 106(2): 266–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawska E (2007) International migration: its various mechanisms and different theories that try to explain it. In: Willy brandt series of working papers in international migration and ethnic relations 1(07)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyamnjoh FB (2013) Fiction and reality of mobility in Africa. Citizsh Stud 17(6–7):653–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peberdy S (2002) Hurdles to trade? South Africa’s immigration policy and informal sector cross-border traders in the SADC. In: Proceedings of the SAMP/LHR/HSRC workshop on regional integration, poverty and South Africa’s proposed migration policy, Pretoria, 23 April 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Peberdy S, Crush J (1998) Rooted in racism: the origins of the aliens control acs. Beyond control: immigration and human rights in a democratic South Africa. Southern Africa Migration Project, Cape Town, pp 18–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Peberdy S, Rogerson C (2000) Transnationalism and non-South African entrepreneurs in South Africa’s small, medium and micro enterprise (SMME) economy. Can J Afr Study 34(1):20–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Peberdy S, Campbell E, Cau B, Crush J, Green T, Msibi N, Mulenga L, Nickanor N, Raimundo I, Tevera D, Tawodzera G, Tsoka M, Zindela N (2015) ‘Informal cross border trading in southern Africa: A regional profile’, Southern African Migration Project (SAMP) Policy Series No. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzano A (2016) Integration’ or ‘selective incorporation’? The modes of governance in informal trading policy in the inner city of Johannesburg. J Dev Stud 52(4):498–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pucci P (2016) Mobility practices as a knowledge and design tool for urban policy. In: Pucci P, Colleoni and M (eds) Understanding mobilities for designing contemporary cities, research for development. Springer International Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimundo I (2009) Gender, choice and migration household dynamics and urbanisation in mozambique. Thesis submitted for the degree of doctor of philosophy of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Graduate School of Humanities Forced Migration Program

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J (2006) Ordinary cities: between modernity and development. Questioning Cities Series, Paperback, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simone AM (2004) People as infrastructure: intersecting fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture 16(3):407–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simone AM (2011) The urbanity of movement: dynamic frontiers in contemporary Africa. J Plann Educ Res 22(10):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Simone AM (2014) Infrastructure, real economies and social transformation: assembling the components for regional urban development in Africa. In: Parnell S, Pieterse E (eds) Africa’s Urban Revolution. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum F, Taylor I (2008) Afro-regions the dynamics of cross-border micro-regionalism. In: Africa, Nordiska Afrikainstitutet, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström O et al (2013) Critical Mobilities. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström O (2014) Cities in relations: trajectories of urban development in Hanoi and Ouagadougou. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrius A (1993) Territoires circulatoires et espaces urbains. différenciation des groupes migrants, Published. http://1libertaire.free.fr/Tgv03.html

  • Urry J, Sheller M (2006) The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning 38(2): 207–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal D (2010) Living in, out of, and between two cities: Migrants from Maputo in Johannesburg. Urban Forum 21(1):55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The article reports some of the results from the Ph.D. research conducted by the author in the Doctoral School of Regional Planning and Public Policy of the IUAV University of Venice between 2014 and 2017. In particular, the author would like to show her gratitude to Raymond Mapakata for the valuable help provided during the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Piscitelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Piscitelli, P. (2018). Mobile Urbanity in Southern Africa. The Socio-Spatial Practices of Informal Cross-Border Traders Between Johannesburg and Maputo. In: Petrillo, A., Bellaviti, P. (eds) Sustainable Urban Development and Globalization. Research for Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61988-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics