Abstract
This book has investigated current and future mining projects in several communities in three arctic countries: Norway, Greenland and (Northwest) Russia. Complex processes related to planning and operating arctic mines are taking place at a time when low-carbon transitions are at the top of the political agenda. While there’s a need for minerals in the transition to renewable energy – which means that mining could be seen as a necessary activity for global sustainable development – mining operations also challenge environmental, social and economic sustainability where they take place. Local and national environmental activists have applied the term ‘sacrifice zones’ to describe particular areas heavily (and negatively) influenced by the consequences of excessive mining, including landscape encroachments and pollution of ecosystems. The “will to drill” in arctic communities, as described and analyzed in this book, is intriguing in that it reveals multiple ways of interpreting sustainability in relation to mining. In this final chapter we elaborate upon the cases described in the earlier chapters. We consider how particular narratives might explain the way that trade-offs are made between developments that are considered sustainable and notions of sacrifice at the local level. These explanations include ways that legitimacy is secured (or not secured) through the use of scientific knowledge and other knowledge traditions, and how such knowledge, if used successfully, can provide legitimacy for both supporters and opponents of mining. The chapter also identifies knowledge gaps and unanswered questions that point towards a future political and academic mining agenda – in the Arctic and for the extractive industries as a whole.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See http://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::P12100_ILO_CODE:C169, accessed May 11th, 2016.
References
Bjørst, L. R. (2016). Saving or destroying the local community? Conflicting spatial storylines in the Greenlandic debate on uranium. The Extractive Industries and Society. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2015.11.006.
Dale, B. (2016). Governing resources, governing mentalities. Petroleum and the Norwegian integrated ecosystem-based management plan for the Barents and Lofoten seas in 2011. Journal of Extractive Industries and Society, 3(1), 9–16. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2015.10.002.
Davis, M. (1993). The dead west: Ecocide in Marlboro County. New Left Review, 1(200).
de Rosa, M. (2014). Mining in Greenland: The science-policy nexus in valuing the environment. (Master of Science). Norway: Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås.
Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. New York: Routledge.
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fox, J. (1999). Mountaintop removal in West Virginia: An environmental sacrifice zone. Organization & Environment, 12, 163.
Hanna, P., Vanclay, F., Langdon, E. J., & Arts, J. (2016). Conceptualizing social protest and the significance of protest actions to large projects. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(1), 217–239. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2015.10.006.
Hovelsrud, G. K., Poppel, B., & Van Oort, B. (2011). Arctic societies, cultures and peoples in a changing cryosphere. AMBIO, 40, 100–110.
Isaeva, L., & Masloboev, V. (2015). Poster: Research support of mining projects in the Arctic. Paper presented at the In the spirit of the Rovaniemi process, Rovaniemi, Finland.
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. Oxon: Routledge.
Knol, M. (2010). Scientific advice in integrated ocean management: The process towards the Barents Sea plan. Marine Policy, 34(2), 252–260. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2009.07.009.
Leach, M., Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (Eds.). (2010). Dynamic sustainabilities. Technology, environment, social justice. Sussex: Earthscan Routhledge.
Lerner, S. (2010). Sacrifice zones. The front lines of toxic exposure in the United States. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.
Nenasheva, M., Bickford, S., Lesser, P., Koivurova, T., & Kankaanpää, P. (2015). Legal tools for public participation in the environmental impact Assessment application in the countries of tha Barents Euro-Arctic region. Barents Studies, 1(3).
Nuttall, M. (2013). Zero-tolerance, uranium and Greenland’s mining future. The Polar Journal, 3(2), 368–383.
Nygaard, V. (2016). Do indigenous interests have a say in planning of new mining projects? Experiences from Finnmark, Norway. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(1), 17–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.11.009.
Ostrom, E. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282. doi:10.1126/science.284.5412.278.
Reinert, H. (2016). On the shore: Thinking water at a prospective mining site in Northern Norway. Society & Natural Resources, 1–14. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1132352.
Scott, R. R. (2010). Hillbillies and coal miners: Representations of a National Sacrifice Zone. In R. R. Scott (Ed.), Removing mountains: Extracting mountains and indentity in the Appalachian coalfields. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Storm, A. (2014). Post-industrial landscape scars: Palgrave Macmillan.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.
Wilson, D. C. (2010). Paradoxes of transparency: Science and the ecosystem approach to fisheries management in Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Wilson, E. (2015). Energy and minerals in Greenland. Governance, corporate responsibility and social resilience. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Wilson, E., & Stammler, F. (2016). Beyond extractivism and alternative cosmologies: Arctic communities and extractive industries in uncertain times. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(1), 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2015.12.001.
Wilson, E., Best, S., Blackmore, E., & Ospanova, S. (2016). Meaningful community engagement in the extractive industries: Stakeholder perspectives and research priorities. Retrieved from London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dale, B., Bay-Larsen, I., Skorstad, B. (2018). The Will to Drill. Revisiting Arctic Communities. In: Dale, B., Bay-Larsen, I., Skorstad, B. (eds) The Will to Drill - Mining in Arctic Communites. Springer Polar Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62610-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62610-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62608-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62610-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)