Abstract
Greenland is challenged by harsh economic realities. The exploitation of mineral and energy resources seems to be among the most obvious ways to address the challenges of ensuring a viable and sustainable future for Greenland and its communities. The economic issues are particularly important in relation to the ambitions of taking over responsibilities regarding other policy areas like foreign affairs, and monitoring and protection of fisheries rights where the Danish government is still in charge and paying the costs. Resource management in Greenland has been characterized by pragmatic approaches, not only to the managing of the living and renewable resources, but also in connection with the ongoing adjusting the regulations for mining. The block grant from Denmark acts as a stabilizer for Greenland’s economy, reducing overheating in times of large natural-resource revenue as it is reduced when income from extractive industries are of a significant size. This reduces the potential for “boom and bust” scenarios occurring, as observed in other parts of the Arctic. Nevertheless, irrespective of whether one sees the Greenlandic discourse on mining as hegemonic or not in terms of future development, mining activities may have a potentially far reaching impact on various ecosystem services – and hence on these services’ role as developmental alternatives or supplements to mining.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Critical voices in parliament emphasized at the time how the decisions has been a step-back in relation to the process of Self Rule because responsibilities in relation to these matters – which have already been taken home with Self Rule – are hereby returned to Denmark.
- 2.
- 3.
Australian mining company Greenland Minerals and Energy (GME).
- 4.
Ta for Tantalum, Nb for Niobium, REE for rare earth elements and Z for Zirconium. Analyses of ore samples show that 1.8 % of the ore is Zirconium Oxide, 0.2 % Niobium Oxide, 0.5 % Light Rare Earths, 0.15 % Heavy Rare Earths and 0.02 % Tantalum Oxide.
- 5.
A Foresight analysis is a methodology for the development of local economic and social development strategies based on a structured dialogue between relevant actors, and with input from as well local, regional and national actors (Rasmussen 2017). The purpose is to provide a basis for action, focusing on the potential offered and clarified through the analyses.
- 6.
Visions of development initiatives – Reporting from a workshop on sustainable regional development in South Greenland» (Working Group for Sustainable Regional Development in the Nordic Arctic 2016).
References
Bjørst, L. R. (2016). Saving or destroying the local community? Conflicting spatial storylines in the Greenlandic debate on uranium. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3, 34–40.
Bureau of Minerals and Petroleum (2008). Geology and ore 11/2008.
Dale, B. (2015). Koblingerne mellem storskala-aktiviteter og lokale erhvervsaktiviteter – Erfaringer fra Mineralgruppen i Nordland. (Coupling between large scale activities and local business development – Experiences from the Mineral Group in Nordland, Norway) i Rasmussen, R.O. og Jungsberg, L. for Arbejdsgruppen for bæredygtig regional udvikling i Arktis: Storskala aktiviteter i Arktis - Hovedpunkter fra Seminar i Qaqortoq, Sydgrønland, 17. september 2014, Nordregio Working Paper 2015:1.
de Rosa, M. (2014). Mining in Greenland: The Science-Policy Nexus in valuing the environment. Department og International Environment and Development Studies (NORAGRIC). Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Thesis in Master of Science.
Finansdepartementet, Grønlands Selvstyre (2015). Den Nødvendige Koordinering. Landsplanredegørelse 2015 (Department of Finances (2015):The Necessary Coordination. Comprehensive National Planning Report). Nuuk 2015.
Garcia-Blanco, G., Feliu, E., Schröder, R., Pedroli, B., Stemmer, B., Hage, G., Bruns, D., Jiménez, J.M., Munárriz, D., Rasmussen, R.O., Harbo, L.G., Perjo, L., Berlina, A., Jersic, M.S., Marega, M., Simoneti, M. (2013): Liveland, liveable landscapes – a key value for sustainable territorial development. ESPON Targeted Analysis 2013/2/22, 2013. www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_TargetedAnalyses/liveland.html.
Hagen, D., & Evju, M. (2013). Using short-term monitoring data to achieve goals in a large-scale restoration. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 29. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05769-180329.
Hagen, D., Svavarsdottir, K., Nilsson, C., Tolvanen, A. K., Raulund-Rasmussen, K., Aradóttir, Á. L., Fosaa, A., & Halldorsson, G. (2013). Ecological and social dimensions of ecosystem restoration in the Nordic countries. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05891-180434.
Hansen, A. M. (2011). Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) as a means to include environmental knowledge in decision making in the case of an aluminium reduction plant in Greenland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(9, s), 1261–1278.
Hansen, K. G. (2013). Notat om Zoneinddeling. (Note on zoning in Greenland). Tillæg til baggrundspapirerne for udvalget for samfundsgavnlig udnyttelse af Grønlands naturressourcer. Nuuk, December 2013.
Hansen, A. M (2015a). Ungdom, køn og fremtidsperspektiver – Hvad vil de unge mænd? (Youth, Gender, and future perspectives – What do the young men want?) i Rasmussen, R.O. og Jungsberg, L. for Arbejdsgruppen for bæredygtig regional udvikling i Arktis: Storskala aktiviteter i Arktis – Hovedpunkter fra Seminar i Qaqortoq, Sydgrønland, 17. september 2014, Nordregio Working Paper 2015:1.
Hansen, K. G. (2015b). Managing the social impacts of the rapidly-expanding extractive industries in Greenland. Extractive Industries and Society, 2015.
Hansen, K.G. (2016). Fra passiv iagttager til aktiv deltager. Forskellige diskursers, styreformers og legitimiteters indflydelse på den gradvist øgede demokratisering i Grønland gennem de seneste 150 år. (From passive observer to active participant. Different discourses, governance structures, and legitimties and their influence on the stepwise increased democratization in Greenland during the last 150 years). PhD report ved Institut for Planlægning, Aalborg Universitet, forsvaret 29 januar 2016.
Hansen, A. M., & Kørnøv, L. (2010). A value-rational view of impact assessment of mega industry in a Greenland planning and policy context. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 28(2), 135–145.
Hansen, K.G Rasmussen, R.O., (2013). New economic activities and urbanisation: Individual reasons for moving and for staying – Case Greenland. In Hansen, Rasmussen and Weber (Eds), Proceedings from the First International Conference on Urbanisation in the Arctic. Conference 28–30 August 2012, Ilim-marfik, Nuuk, Greenland. Nordregio Working Paper 2013:6.
Hansen, K.G., Lund Sørensen, F. Jeppson, S.R. (2009). Decision processes, communication and democracy: The aluminium smelter project in Greenland. In Hukkinen, Hansen, Langlais, Rasmussen, Jeppson, Levänen, Lund Sørensen, Schmitt, & Lange (Eds), Knowledge-based tools for sustainable governance of energy and climate adaptation in the Nordic periphery. (K-Base). Nordic Council of Ministers Research Programme Report 2009:7.
Hansen, A. M., Vanclay, F., Croal, P. Skjervedal, A-S. H. (2016). Managing the social impacts of the rapidly expanding extractive industries in Greenland. The Extractive Industries and Society.
Hostovsky, C. (1989). Social impact assessment. From EA update 12 #2, page 6-11. Ministry of the Environment. HRV engineering, retrieved from http://www.alcan.com/web/publishing.nsf/attachmentsbytitle/investors-otherpublications/$file/alcan_facts_2003_eng_web.pdf.
Hubbard, S. (2013). Addressing Uranium Contamination on the Navajo Nation. EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency. Pacific Southwest Superfund Region 9. https://www3.epa.gov/region9/superfund/navajo-nation 2013.
Jensen, K. (1998). Effekter af storskala råstofprojekter i Grønland – med speciel vægt på de beskæftigelsesmæssige forhold (Effects of large scale resource projects in Greenland – emphasizing employment relations). Rapport om Arbejdsmarkedsforhold nr. 2, Direktoratet for Sociale Anliggender, Arbejdsmarked og Offentlige Arbejder.
Jensen, K. (2014). Storskala-aktiviteter i Sydgrønland (Large scale activities in South Greenland). i Rasmussen, R.O. og Jungsberg, L. for Arbejdsgruppen for bæredygtig regional udvikling i Arktis: Storskala aktiviteter i Arktis - Hovedpunkter fra Seminar i Qaqortoq, Sydgrønland, 17. september 2014, Nordregio Working Paper 2015:1.
Jensen, K. Rasmussen, R.O. (2016). REGINA step 1 of the local smart specialisation strategy – Case Kujalleq. Contribution to the REGINA Remote Communities and Resource-based Industries NPA Project 2016.
Jørgensen, P.H. (2015). Lokal arbejdsstyrke og lokal kompetenceudvikling – Opkvalificering og uddannelse, særligt unge, mod råstofsektoren (Local work force and local competence development – qualification and education especially among young persons aiming at working in the mineral exploitation sector. I Rasmussen, R.O. og Jungsberg, L. for Arbejdsgruppen for bæredygtig regional udvikling i Arktis: Storskala aktiviteter i Arktis – Hovedpunkter fra Seminar i Qaqortoq, Sydgrønland, 17. september 2014, Nordregio Working Paper 2015:1.
Jungsberg, L. (2014). Grønlandsk guld, globale investeringer – en undersøgelse af lokale aktørers perspektiver på guldminedrift i Sydgrønland (Greenland gold, global investments – and investigations of the perspectives of local actors in relation to Gold mining in South Greenland). Speciale (Master Thesis), Roskilde University 2014.
Kommune Kujalleq (2014a). Råstofaktiviteter – Forslag til en strategi- og handlingsplan (Ressource exploitation activities – a suggested plan for strategies). Kommune Kujalleq, 2014).
Kommune Kujalleq (2014b): Den økonomiske udvikling – Forslag til 10 årsplan. (The Economic Development – a suggested 10-year development plan). Kommune Kujalleq, 2014.
Kørnøv, L., Lyhne, I., Larsen, S. V., & Hansen, A. M. (2011). Change agents in the field of strategic environmental assessment: What does it involve and what potentials does it have for research and practice? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 13(2. s), 203–228.
Lerner, S. (2010). Sacrifice zones. The front lines of toxic exposure in the United States. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Nilsson, C., A. L. Aradottir, D. Hagen, G. Halldórsson, K. Høegh, R. J. Mitchell, K. Raulund-Rasmussen, K. Svavarsdóttir, A. Tolvanen, S. D. Wilson (2016). Evaluating the process of ecological restoration. Ecology and Society 21(1):41. http://dx.doi. org/10.5751/ES-08289-210141
Pagh Nielsen, K. M., & Breinholt Larsen, F. (1985). Grønlandsk råstofpolitik – grønlandsk indflydelse? Politica. Bind, 17(1985), 1.
Rasmussen, R. O. (2003). Labour market consequences of large scale resource development in the Arctic. In R. O. Rasmussen, Koroleva, & E. Natalia (Eds.), 2003: Social and environmental impacts in the north, Proceedings of the NATO advanced research workshop. Nato Science series: IV: Earth and environmental Sciences volume 31. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Rasmussen, R.O. (2005a). Analyse af fangererhvervet i Grønland (Analysis of hunters in Greenland). Roskilde University 2005.
Rasmussen, R.O. (2005b). Small, medium and large scale strategies: Cases of social response and change in Greenland. In L. Müller-Wille, M. C. S. Kingsley, S. Stach Nielsen (Eds), Socio-economic research on management systems of living resources – strategies, recommendations and examples. Inussuk – Arctic Researc Journal 1, 2005.
Rasmussen, R.O. in cooperation with Børgesen, S.W., Hwang, K., Kharchuk, B., Roto, J., Lund Sørensen, F., Rusbjerg, J., Schmidt, G. (2010). Mobilitet i Grønland (Mobility in Greenland). Nordregio for Grønlands Selvstyre 2010. Available at: http://www.smv.gl/DK/mobilitet/rapporter/samlet_mobilitet_v04_feb2010.pdf.
Rasmussen, R. O. (2014a). Baggrundspapir: Om internationale erfaringer.(Background paper on international experiences). Udvalget for samfundsgavnlig udnyttelse af Grønlands naturressourcer (2014). Til gavn for Grønland” (“To the benefit of Greenland”).
Rasmussen, R.O (2014b). Narsaq: A community challenged by municipal restructuring and uranium mining in South Greenland. In R. Weber & R. O. Rasmussen (Eds), Sustainable regions – sustainable local communities. NORDREGIO contributions to ICASS VIII: Northern Sustainabilities congress. NORDREGIO WORKING PAPER 2014:2
Rasmussen, R.O. Comtois, R. (1997). Sustainable development in the north: Local initiatives vs megaprojects. Proceedings of the Second Circumpolar Social Science Ph.D. Network Conference, held in Aguanish, Québec, 1997. GETIC, Sainte-Foy, Presses de l’Université Laval.
Rasmussen, R.O Jensen, K. (2016). Kujalleq reflections in relation to step 2 and step 3 in the REGINA LS3 – methodological reflections. Kujalleq 2016.
Rasmussen, R.O., & Jensen, K. (2017). The Foresight Approach in Theory and Practice. Draft version prepared 2015 for the working group for Sustainable Regional Development in the Arctic; Revised version prepared for use in the Regina Project in Kommune Kujalleq. Geoscan and Kommune Kujalleq, Roskilde and Qaqortoq 2017.
Rasmussen, R. O., Natalia, E., & Koroleva (Eds.). (2003). Social and environmental impacts in the north, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop. Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences (Vol. 31). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sejersen (2014). Sejersen, Frank (2014): Efterforskning og udnyttelse af råstoffer i Grønland i historisk perspektiv. Baggrundspapir: Udvalget for samfundsgavnlig udnyttelse af Grønlands naturressourcer (2014).University of Greenland and University of Copenhagen (2014): Til gavn for Grønland” (“To the benefit of Greenland”).
Spoel, Philippa Hoed, Rebecca C. (2014). Places and people: Rhetorical constructions of “community” in a Canadian environmental risk assessment. Environmental communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture.
Storey, K. Hamilton L.C. (2003): Planning for the impacts of megaprojects. Two north American Examples. Rasmussen, Rasmus Ole Koroleva, Natalia E. 2003: Social and environmental impacts in the north. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop. Nato Science Series: IV: Earth and Environmental Sciences 31. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Svennevig, I. (1997). Hvem er de ‘lokale’ i naturbevaring? (Who are the “locals” in relation to nature protection? Humanities Research Center: Man & Nature – Working paper 108.
Tommasini, Daniela (2011). Tourism experiences in the peripheral north. Case Studies from Greenland, Nuuk, Government of Greenland, Ministry of Education and Research, Inussuk, 2.
Vestergaard, C. & F. Bourgouin (2012). Should Greenland mine its uranium? Working paper from DIIS.
Winther, G., Poppel, B., Rasmussen, R.O. (2006). Challenges to socio-economic research in a changing Society: With a special focus on Greenland. In Ludger Muller-Wille, Michael C.S. Kingsley, Søren Stach Nielsen (Eds), Socio-economic research on management systems of living resources: Strategies, recommendations and Examples. Vol. 1 Nuuk : AKA print/Inussuk (Arktisk Forskningsjournal) og Norden (Det Nordiske Ministeråd), 2006.
Working Group for Sustainable Regional Development in the Nordic Arctic (2016). Visions of development initiatives – reporting from a workshop on sustainable regional development in South Greenland».
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rasmussen, R.O., Gjertsen, A. (2018). Sacrifice Zones for a Sustainable State? Greenlandic Mining Politics in an Era of Transition. In: Dale, B., Bay-Larsen, I., Skorstad, B. (eds) The Will to Drill - Mining in Arctic Communites. Springer Polar Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62610-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62610-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62608-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62610-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)