Skip to main content

Rule-Based Economics in Empirical Practice: Effective Tool for Theory Building

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Entrepreneur in Rule-Based Economics

Part of the book series: Economic Complexity and Evolution ((ECAE))

  • 499 Accesses

Abstract

We assess the benefits and challenges that rule-based economics implies for theory building and empirical research. Benchmarking empirical results drawn from an original study presented earlier against evidence from inquiries relying on more traditional approaches it can be shown that rule-based analysis implies four important advantages: (1) the distinction of rules from operations enables a more clear-cut analysis and helps to exclude false positives, (2) the distinction of sub-groups of agents allows conducting more profound analysis, (3) the transdisciplinary nature of rule-based economics enables the testing of a more complete set of influencing factors, and (4) the evolutionary perspective secures the inclusion of dynamic phenomena.

At the same time, rule-based economics implies a number of challenges such as intricacies linked to the distinction of rules from operations, data availability issues and a considerably larger workload. In spite of these challenges, rule-based economics offers potential for superior research outcomes if the methodological guidance is duly followed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Also failing to include a suitable control variable for the urban-rural divide, the respective dummy eventually produced significant parameter estimates as it accidentally proved a strong covariate of the missing control.

  2. 2.

    As Masuda had to rely on a rather weak argument based on difference in significance levels for his parameter estimates, his evidence has to be considered much less robust.

References

  • Blind GD (2012a) Investigating entrepreneurial spirit with the rule approach: why self-employment is on the decline in Japan. Evol Inst Econ Rev 9(1):183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blind GD (2012b) Culture and economic explanation: economics in the US and Japan. By Donald W. Katzner. New York: Routledge, 2008. 184 pp. $39.95 (paper). J East Asian Stud 12(1):150–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blind GD (2016) Behavioral rules: Veblen, Nelson-Winter, Oström and beyond. In: Frantz R, Chen S-H, Dopfer K, Heukelom F, Mousavi S (eds) Routledge handbook of behavioral economics. Routledge, Milton Park, pp 139–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Blind G, Pyka A (2014) The rule approach in evolutionary economics: a methodological template for empirical research. J Evol Econ 24(5):1085–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blind GD, Pyka A (2015) Erich Schneider: the admiring disciple who did not become a follower. J Evol Econ 25(1):239–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blind G, Ziltener P (2014) Free trade live: insights from the Switzerland-Japan free trade and economic partnership agreement. In: Mottini R (ed) Yearbook 2014. Swiss Japanese Chamber of Commerce, Zurich, pp 53–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiavacci D, Blind G et al (2012) Ist das Freihandels- und wirtschaftliche Partnerschaftsabkommen (FHWPA) zwischen der Schweiz und Japan (bereits) eine Erfolgsgeschichte? Hauptergebnisse einer empirischen Analyse zu Umsetzung und Wirkung. Asiat Stud 66(1):19–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Dopfer K (2004) The economic agent as rule maker and rule user: Homo sapiens oeconomicus. J Evol Econ 14:177–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dopfer K, Potts J (2008) The general theory of economic evolution. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dopfer K, Foster J et al (2004) Micro-meso-macro. J Evol Econ 14:263–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harada N (2005) Potential entrepreneurship in Japan. Small Bus Econ 25(3):293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzner DW (2008) Culture and economic explanation: economics in the US and Japan. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Masuda T (2006) The determinants of latent entrepreneurship in Japan. Small Bus Econ 26:227–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1986) An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice 48(1):3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oström E, Basurto X (2011) Crafting analytical tools to study institutional change. J Inst Econ 7(3):317–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider E (1953[1949]) Einführung in die Wirtschaftstheorie II. 2nd edn. JCB Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen T (1925) Economic theory in the calculable future. Am Econ Rev 15(1 Suppl):48–55

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Blind, G.D. (2017). Rule-Based Economics in Empirical Practice: Effective Tool for Theory Building. In: The Entrepreneur in Rule-Based Economics. Economic Complexity and Evolution. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62779-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics