Skip to main content

Debunking Interregionalism: Concepts, Types and Critique – With a Pan-Atlantic Focus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interregionalism across the Atlantic Space

Part of the book series: United Nations University Series on Regionalism ((UNSR,volume 15))

Abstract

Interregionalism means region-to-region relations. Its relevance lies on two assumptions: that regionalism is a significant mechanism of governance and that regions are outward looking. The fact that both assumptions are contested confers the concept of interregionalism a structural fuzziness. In this chapter we seek to grasp the phenomenon by following a sequential path: we first deal with definitions, types and theory, only then to look into the empirical evidence in search of correspondence between names and facts. By looking into transatlantic interregionalism, we find it as a large umbrella that brings together very diverse groupings of countries under a same, moderately inconsequential, working mechanism: summitry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aggarwal, V., & Fogarty, E. A. (2005). The limits of interregionalism: The EU and North America. Journal of European Integration, 27(3), 327–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • América Latina Hoy. (2005). Issue #40 on “Presidential Summits”. University of Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baert, F., Scaramagli, T., & Söderbaum, F. (Eds.). (2014). Intersecting interregionalism. Regions, global governance and the EU. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2009). Diffusing (Inter-) Regionalism: The EU as a Model of Regional Integration. KFG working paper Series, No. 7, Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG) “The Transformative Power of Europe”. Free University Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caetano, G. (2010). Introducción. In G. Caetano (Ed.), Las Negociaciones entre América Latina y el Caribe con la Unión Europea. Ediciones Trilce: Montevideo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claude, I. L. (1971). Swords into plowshares. The problems and progress of international organization. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. F. (2010). The G20 as an improvised crisis committee and/or a contested ‘steering committee’. International Affairs, 86(3), 741–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Medeiros, M. A. (2000). La Genèse du Mercosud. Dynamisme Interne, Influence de l’Union Européenne et Insertion Internationale. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, M. (2011). The European Union and interregionalism. Patterns of engagement. Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doidge, M. (2014). Interregionalism and the European Union: Conceptualising group-to-group relations. In F. Baert, T. Scaramagli, & F. Söderbaum (Eds.), Intersecting interregionalism. Regions, global governance and the EU. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecorys. (2006). Evaluation of the civil society dialogue at DG trade. Assessment of relevance, effectiveness and efficiency of CSD policy and procedures. Report commissioned by the EU Dg Trade. Rotterdam 9th October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyinla, B. M. (2004). Beyond Cairo: Emerging pattern of Euro-African relationship. Africa: Rivista trimestrale di studi e documentazione dell’Istituto italiano per l’Africa e l’Oriente, 59(2), 159–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbrini, S., & Malamud, A. (2013). Le organizzazioni regionali e l’integrazione economica. In R. Belloni, M. Moschella, & D. Sicurelli (Eds.), Le organizzazioni internazionali: struttura, funzioni, impatto (pp. 167–186). Il Mulino: Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L., & Hurrell, A. (Eds.). (1995). Regionalism in world politics: Regional organization and international order. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FCO 1, Foreign and Commonwealth Office. (2013). Interview with a Diplomat member of the UK delegation to the 2013 EU-Latin America and the Caribbean Summit. London, 28th February.

    Google Scholar 

  • FCO 2, Foreign and Commonwealth Office. (2012). Interview with a Diplomat who supported the UK Government Delegation to the 2013 EU-Latin America and the Caribbean Summit. Santiago de Chile, 14th September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gahr Store, J. (2012). Trops de sommets tue les sommets. Le Monde Diplomatique. September, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, A., & Payne, A. (1996). Regionalism and world order. London: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, J., & Keohane, R. O. (1993). Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework. In J. Goldstein & R. O. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and foreign policy. Beliefs, institutions, and political change (pp. 3–30). Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hänggi, H. (2000). Interregionalism: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. Paper prepared for the Workshop “Dollars, Democracy and Trade. External Influence on Economic Integration in the Americas”. Los Angeles, May 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hänggi, H., Rüland, J., & Roloff, R. (Eds.). (2006). Interregionalism and international relations. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, B., & Söderbaum, F. (1998). The new regionalism Approach. Politeia, 17(3), 6–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, B., & Söderbaum, F. (2000). Theorizing the rise of ‘Regionness’. New Political Economy, 5(3), 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgott, R., & Phillips, N. (2000). Challenging triumphalism and convergence: The limits of global liberalization in Asia and Latin America. Review of International Studies, 26(3), 359–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C., & Smith, M. (2011). International relations and the European Union. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulse, M., Stapel, S. & Striebinger, K. (2015). Conceptualizing and theorizing the drivers, interactions, and effects of overlapping regionalism. Paper prepared for the workshop overlapping regionalism: Drivers, interactions, effects, ISA Annual Convention. New Orleans, 17 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, A. (1995). Regionalism in theoretical perspective. In L. Fawcett & A. Hurrell (Eds.), Regionalism in world politics. Regional organization and international order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isbell, P., & Nolan García, K. A. (2015). Regionalism and interregionalism in Latin America: The beginning or the end of Latin America’s ‘Continental Integration’? Atlantic Future Scientific Paper 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacowicz, A. (2015). Regional governance and global governance: Possible links, alternative explanations, and the Latin American case, 1991–2015. Submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupchan, C. A. (2006). The new Transatlantic interregionalism and the end of the Atlantic Alliance. In H. Hänggi, J. Rüland, & R. Roloff (Eds.), Interregionalism and international relations. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, F. (2003). Theoretical perspectives on comparative regional integration. In F. Laursen (Ed.), Comparative regional integration: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 3–28). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Gloannec, A.-M. (2004). The unilateralist temptation Germany’s foreign policy after the Cold War. Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, 1, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L. N. (1963). The political dynamics of European economic integration. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAE, Ministero degli Affari Esteri. (2012). Interview with a Diplomat who supported the Italian government delegation to the 2013 EU-Latin America and the Caribbean Summit. Santiago de Chile, 14th September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maihold, G. (2010). La productividad del proceso de cumbres euro-latinoamericanas. Una evaluación a diez años de rio. In G. Caetano (Ed.), Las Negociaciones entre América Latina y el Caribe con la Unión Europea (pp. 21–60). Montevideo: Ediciones Trilce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, A. (2013). Overlapping regionalism, no integration: Conceptual issues and the Latin American experience. EUI Working Papers, RSCAS 2013/20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, A., & Gardini, G. L. (2012). Has regionalism peaked? the Latin American quagmire and its lessons. The International Spectator, 47(1), 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattheis, F. (2014). New regionalism in the South: Mercosur and SADC in a comparative and interregional perspective. Leipzig: Universitätsverlag Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melissen, J. (2003). Summit diplomacy coming of age. Discussion papers in diplomacy, Netherlands Institute of International relations “Clingendael”.

    Google Scholar 

  • MinRel 1, Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de la Republica de Chile. (2012). Interview with a Diplomat responsible for the logistics of the 2013 EU-Latin America and the Caribbean Summit. Santiago de Chile, 13th September.

    Google Scholar 

  • MinRel 2, Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de la Republica de Chile. (2012). Interview with a Diplomat responsible for the organisation of the 2013 EU-Latin America and the Caribbean Summit. Santiago de Chile, 20th September.

    Google Scholar 

  • MinRel 3, Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de la Republica de Chile. (2012). Interview with a Diplomat responsible for the organisation of the 2013 EU-Latin America and the Caribbean Summit. Santiago de Chile, 19th September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. N. (1968). International regionalism. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Siochru, S. (2004). Civil society participation in the WSIS process: Promises and reality. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 18(3), 330–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peake, S. (2002). The Jo’Burg Summit: What did it really mean for renewables? Refocus, 3(6), 46–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peña, F. (2010). Ante las nuevas circunstancias internacionales: experiencias y futuro de las relaciones América Latina y Caribe con la Unión Europea. In G. Caetano (Ed.), Las Negociaciones entre América Latina y el Caribe con la Unión Europea (pp. 61–70). Montevideo: Ediciones Trilce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roloff, R. (1998). Globalisierung, Regionalisierung und Gleichgewicht. In C. Masala & R. Roloff (Eds.), Herausforderungen der Realpolitik (pp. 61–94). Koln: SYH-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüland, J., & Bechle, K. (2014). Defending state-centric regionalism through mimicry and localisation: regional parliamentary bodies in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and Mercosur. Journal of International Relations and Development, 17(1), 61–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saldías, O. (2010). Networks, courts and regional integration. Explaining the establishment of the Andean Court of Justice. KFG working paper, 20, Free University of Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santander, S. (2010). EU-LA relations: from interregionalism to bilateralism? Working paper # 29, CAEI – Centro Argentino de Estudios Internacionales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sberro, S. (2013). After the first EU-CELAC summit in Santiago: A new beginning for the bi-regional strategic association? Paper presented at the European Union Studies Association (EUSA) Conference. Baltimore, May 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2003). The EU, NATO and the integration of Europe. Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. C. (2010). Governance arrangements for sustainability: A regional perspective. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 10(1), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, M., Söderbaum, F., & Ojendal, J. (Eds.). (2001). Regionalization in a globalizing world: A comparative perspective on forms, actors and processes. London/New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F. (2012). Interregionalism. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of globalization (pp. 1200–1202). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F., & Van Langenhove, L. (2005). Introduction: The EU as a global actor and the role of interregionalism. Journal of European Integration, 27(3), 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tovias, A. (2008). The brave new world of cross-regionalism. CEPII Working Paper No. 2008-03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, L., & Barahona de Brito, A. (2005). Las cumbres mundiales y sus versiones latinoamericanas: ¿Haciendo una montaña de un grano de arena? América Latina Hoy, 40, 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Benjamin Faude, Andréas Litsegård, Frank Mattheis and Fredrik Söderbaum for very generous advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gian Luca Gardini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gardini, G.L., Malamud, A. (2018). Debunking Interregionalism: Concepts, Types and Critique – With a Pan-Atlantic Focus. In: Mattheis, F., Litsegård, A. (eds) Interregionalism across the Atlantic Space. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62908-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics