Skip to main content

The Use of Dramatic Metaphor in Kahneman’s Psychology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Deep Drama

Abstract

Psychological discourse is filled with metaphors—mental life being resistant to easy objectification. Metaphors can lose their as if qualification with the passage of time, so that an unexamined metaphor assumes mythic status and this can be stultifying. In his recent book, Thinking Fast and Slow, Kahneman proposes fresh metaphors for the processes of making choices, assessing satisfaction, and constructing plans of action. Kahneman proposes two systems within us—one fast and one slow—and two selves, one that experiences and another that remembers—inexactly, of course. This work is an example of the value of new and powerful metaphors in opening the way to new understandings of the science of mental life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In Sarbin (1982, p. 221).

  2. 2.

    See Sarbin (1982); Turbayne (1962).

References

  • Goldstein, E. R. (2011, November 8). The anatomy of influence. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, E. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. (2017). The undoing project: A friendship that changed our minds. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, K. S. (2000). Metaphor analysis in psychology—Method, theory, and fields of application. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarbin, T. R. (1982). The root metaphor of metaphor. In V. L. Allen & K. E. Scheibe (Eds.), The social context of conduct. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, welfare, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turbayne, C. M. (1962). The myth of metaphor. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scheibe, K.E. (2017). The Use of Dramatic Metaphor in Kahneman’s Psychology. In: Deep Drama. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62986-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics