Abstract
This chapter considers the legal case of Stamford Hospital vs. Nelly E. Vega, 674 A. 2d 821 (Conn., 1996). In this matter, an obstetrical patient was given blood transfusions against her will despite having articulated a clear preference for not receiving blood products. Clinical issues discussed include the distinction between civil competency and civil capacity, approaches to assessments of decision-making capacity, selection of a proxy decision-maker, and special considerations in the care of the Jehovah’s Witness patient.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Stamford Hospital vs. Nelly E. Vega, 674 A. 2d 821 (Conn.). 1996.
Resnick PJ, Sorrentino R. Forensic issues in consultation-liaison psychiatry. Psychiatric Times. 2005. http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/articles/forensic-issues-consultation-liaison-psychiatry. Accessed 22 May 2017.
Appelbaum PS. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1834–40.
Palmer BW, Harmell AL. Assessment of healthcare decision-making capacity. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016;31:530–40.
Sessums LL, Zembrzuska H, Jackson JL. Does this patient have medical decision-making capacity? JAMA. 2011;306:420–7.
Karlawish J. Measuring decision-making capacity in cognitively impaired individuals. Neurosignals. 2008;16:91–8.
Dunn LB, Nowrangi MA, Palmer BW, Jeste DV, Saks ER. Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: a review of instruments. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:1323–34.
Appelbaum PS, Grisso T. Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:1635–8.
Chow GV, Czarny MJ, Hughes MT, Carrese JA. CURVES: a mnemonic for determining medical decision-making capacity and providing emergency treatment in the acute setting. Chest. 2010;137:421–7. doi:10.1378/chest.09-1133.
Watchtower Online. Available at: https://wol.jw.org/en/wol/d/r1/lp-e/1102000101?q=history&p=par#h=2. Accessed 7 May 2017.
Lawson T, Ralph C. Perioperative Jehovah’s Witnesses: a review. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:676–87.
Shander A, Gross I, Hill S, Javidroozi M, Sledge S. A new perspective on best transfusion practices. Blood Transfus. 2013;11:193–202.
Belaouchi M, Romero E, Mazzinari G, et al. Management of massive bleeding in a Jehovah’s Witness obstetric patient: the overwhelming importance of a pre-established multidisciplinary protocol. Blood Transfus. 2016;14:541–4.
Sagy I, Jotkowitz A, Barski L. Reflections on cultural preferences and internal medicine: the case of Jehovah’s Witnesses and the changing thresholds for blood transfusions. J Relig Health. 2017;56:732.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prabhu, M. (2017). Civil Competence. In: Wasser, T. (eds) Psychiatry and the Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63148-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63148-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63147-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63148-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)