Skip to main content

Affect and Emotion: James, Dewey, Tomkins, Damasio, Massumi, Spinoza

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism

Abstract

In surveying and reconsidering the critical impact of William James on affect theory , this essay follows Brian Massumi by returning to the field’s key conceptual antagonism: the polemical separation of affect from emotion , and the undue theoretical entrenchment by which the unstructured and impersonal “autonomy” of the former (via Deleuze) has relegated the empirical embodiment of the latter (per James) to a marginal theoretical status. In originally describing a feeling “circuitry” underlining event perception, bodily response, and cognitive interpretation, James’ work from 1890, far from being marginal, crucially shapes the subsequent affective ideas and language of the twentieth century in the work of such figures as John Dewey , Silvan Tomkins , and Antonio Damasio. After tracing this trajectory of influence, I invoke Spinoza to suggest implicit connections between the Deleuzian and Jamesian investments in Massumi’s late work. From this perspective, an unexpected reconciliation of mind and body comes into view, one that recovers and portends further Jamesian possibilities for the affective study of embodied emotion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Damasio, Antonio. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demos, Virginia E. “Silvan Tomkins’s Theory of Emotion.” In Reinterpreting the Legacy of William James, edited by Margaret E. Donnelly, 211–220. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. “The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology.” Psychological Review 3, no. 4 (1896): 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “The Theory of Emotion. (I.) Emotional Attitudes.” Psychological Review 1, no. 6 (1894): 553–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— “The Theory of Emotion. (II.) The Significance of Emotions.” Psychological Review 2, no. 1 (1895): 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Spinoza, Benedictus. A Spinoza Reader: The Ethics and Other Works, translated by Edwin M. Curley. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Adam. “Some Affective Bases for Guilt: Tomkins, Freud, Object Relations.” English Studies in Canada 32, no. 1 (2006): 11–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Transferential Poetics, from Poe to Warhol. New York: Fordham University Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossberg, Lawrence. We Gotta Get Out of This Place: Popular Conservatism and Postmodern Culture. New York: Routledge, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, William. “The Physical Basis of Emotion.” Psychological Review 1, no. 5 (1894): 516–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Writings 1902–1910. New York: Library of America, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Principles of Psychology, 2 vols. New York: Dover, 1950 (1890).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “What Is an Emotion?” Mind 9, no. 34 (1884): 188–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Writings 1878–1899. New York: Library of America, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys, Ruth. “The Turn to Affect: A Critique.” Critical Inquiry 37, no. 3 (2011): 434–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, Brian. “Notes on the Translation and Acknowledgments.” In Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, edited and translated by Brian Massumi, xvi–xx. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Ontopower: War, Powers, and the State of Perception. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Politics of Affect. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Q&A with Brian Massumi.” News from Duke University Press. Accessed February 22, 2017. https://dukeupress.wordpress.com/2015/08/19/qa-with-brian-massumi/.

  • ———. Semblance and Event. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, Donald L. Prologue to Affect, Imagery, Consciousness: vol. 1, The Positive Affects, by Silvan S. Tomkins, xi-xxviii. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snaza, Nathan. “Preemptive Logic and the Necessity of Animal Politics.” symploke 24, no. 1–2 (2016): 499–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terada, Rei. Feeling in Theory: Emotion after theDeath of the Subject.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, Silvan. Exploring Affect. The Selected Writings of Silvan S. Tomkins, edited by Virginia E. Demos. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stanley, K. (2017). Affect and Emotion: James, Dewey, Tomkins, Damasio, Massumi, Spinoza. In: Wehrs, D., Blake, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Affect Studies and Textual Criticism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63303-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics