Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Uplift Resistance of Offshore Pipelines Subject to Upheaval Buckling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Soil Dynamics and Soil-Structure Interaction for Resilient Infrastructure (GeoMEast 2017)

Part of the book series: Sustainable Civil Infrastructures ((SUCI))

  • 1139 Accesses

Abstract

Offshore pipelines that transport oil and gas in different areas in the world are often buried in trenches to provide stability and protection against upheaval buckling. Hydrocarbons in the pipeline are transported at high temperatures and pressures to facilitate the oil flow and prevent its solidification. However, this mode of transport causes an increase in the axial compressive forces inside the pipeline which may lead to upward buckling in the direction of the least soil resistance. Upheaval buckling can result in pipeline failure causing severe environmental and economic losses. In this paper, a 3D parametric study of upheaval buckling of pipelines buried in medium dense sand with fines is performed using the finite element software Abaqus©. The effects of pipeline diameter, embedment depth ratio and diameter to wall thickness ratio on the soil resistance against uplift are investigated for pipeline pullout cases simulating plane strain conditions. The results are compared with the available analytical/empirical solutions for the uplift resistance. The results show that the uplift resistance depends in part on the pipeline diameter and embedment depth ratio. The available design methods which assume mobilized soil blocks above the pipeline with inclined slip surfaces better capture the behavior observed in the numerical models, as compared to those methods in which vertical slip surfaces are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

F:

 = Peak uplift resistance per unit length (kN/m)

Rmax :

 = Maximum uplift resistance per unit length (kN/m)

ϒd :

 = Dry unit weight (kN/m3)

ϒsat :

 = Saturated unit weight(kN/m3)

ϒ′:

 = Effective unit weight (kN/m3)

cu :

 = Undrained shear strength (kPa)

c:

 = Soil cohesion (kPa)

E:

 = Young Modulus (Pa)

ν:

 = Poisson’s ratio

D:

 = Outside pipe diameter (mm)

WT:

 = Pipeline wall thickness

H:

 = Soil cover height; depth to the top of the pipe (m)

H/D:

 = Embedment depth ratio

K:

 = Coefficient of lateral earth pressure

Ψ:

 = Dilation angle (°)

Φ:

 = Internal friction angle (°)

Φpeak :

 = Peak friction angle (°)

Φcrit :

 = Critical friction angle (°)

Φ′max :

 = Maximum friction angle (°)

Ψpeak :

 = Peak dilation angle (°)

FE:

 = Finite Element

μ:

 = Interface friction coefficient

References

  • Abaqus Analysis User’s Manual (version 6.13-4). Abaqus, Inc. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • ASCE: Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems. Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifelines of the ASCE Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, Reston, VA (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • ASCE: Guidelines for the design of buried steel pipe. American Lifelines Alliance. ASCE, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransby, M.F., et al.: Numerical and centrifuge modeling of the upheaval resistance of buried pipelines. In: Proceeding of the 20th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, OMAE2001/PIPE-4118 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransby, M.F., et al.: The upheaval capacity of pipelines in jetted clay backfill. Int. J. Offshore Polar 12(4), 280–287 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransby, M.F., Ireland, J.: Rate effects during pipeline upheaval buckling in sand. In: Proceeding of the Institution of Civil Engineers (2009). doi:10.1680/geng.2009.162.5.247

  • Byrne, B.W., et al. Experimental modelling of the unburial behaviour of pipelines. In: Proceeding of Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, TX, Paper OTC 19573 (2008). doi:10.4043/19573-MS

  • Byrne, B.W., et al.: Uplift of shallowly buried pipe sections in saturated very loose sand. Geotechnique (2013). doi:10.1680/geot.11.P.016A

  • Cheuk, C.Y., et al.: Uplift mechanism of pipes buried in sand. J. Geotech. Environ. Eng. (2008). ASCE. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:2(154)

  • Chin, E.L., et al.: Uplift resistance of pipelines buried in cohesionless soil. In: Ng, C.W.W., Wang, Y.H., Zhang, L.M. (eds.) Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, vol. 1, pp. 723–728. Taylor and Francis Group, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Det Norske Veritas (DNV): Global buckling of submarine pipelines-structural design due to high temperature high pressure. RP-F110, Oslo, Norway (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao, X., et al.: Model test based soil spring model and application in pipeline thermal buckling analysis. China Ocean Eng. (2011). Springer. doi:10.1007/s13344-011-0041-6

  • Liu, R., et al.: Numerical studies on global buckling of subsea pipelines. J. Ocean Eng. (2014). Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.12.018

  • Liu, R., et al.: Laboratory tests and thermal buckling analysis for pipes buried in Bohai soft clay. J. Mar. Struct. (2015). Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2015.05.001

  • Liu, J.X., et al.: Study examines causes of upheaval buckling in shallow subsea PIP lines. J. Oil Gas 106(6), 53–57 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, R., et al.: Finite element analysis on thermal upheaval buckling of submarine burial pipelines with initial imperfections. J. Cent. South Univ. Press (2013). Springer, Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/s11771-013-1481-3

  • Newson, T.A., Deljoui, P.: Finite element modeling of upheaval buckling of buried offshore pipelines in clayey soils. In: Proceedings of the Geoshangahai 2006 Conference on Soil and Rock Behavior and Modelling. ASCE (2006). doi:10.1061/40862(194)47

  • Ng, C.W.W., Springman, S.M.: Uplift resistance of buried pipelines in granular materials. In: Leung, C.F., Lee, F.H., Tan, T.S. (eds.) Centrifuge 1994, pp. 753–758 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, A.C., Baldry, J.A.S.: Lateral buckling of axially compressed pipelines. J. Pet. Technol. (1974). Springer. doi:10.2118/4815-PA

  • Palmer, A.C., et al.: Design of submarine pipelines against upheaval buckling. In: Proceeding of the 22nd Offshore Technology Conference, Richardson, TX, pp. 540–550 (1990). doi:10.4043/6335-MS

  • Robert, D.J., Thusyanthan, N.I.: Numerical and experimental study of uplift mobilization of buried pipelines in sands. J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. (2014). ASCE. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000179

  • Robert, D.J., Soga, K.: Soil pipeline interaction in unsaturated soils. In: New Trends in the Mechanics of Geomaterials. Wiley, Lausanne (2010). Chap. 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaminee, P., et al.: Soil response for pipeline upheaval buckling analyses: full-scale laboratory tests and modeling. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Offshore Technology Conference, OTC, Houston, TX, OTC 6486 (1990). doi:10.4043/6486-MS

  • Schupp, J., et al.: Pipeline unburial behaviour in loose sand. In: Proceeding of the 25th International Conference of Offshore Mechanical Arctic Engineering, Hamburg, Paper OMAE2006-92542 (2006). doi:10.1115/OMAE2006-92542

  • Stone, K.J.L., Newson, T.A.: Uplift resistance of buried pipelines: an investigation of scale effects in model tests. In: Ng, C.W.W., Zhang, L.M., Wang, Y.H. (eds.) Proceeding of the 6th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, vol. 1, pp. 741–746. Taylor & Francis Group, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, J., Jukes, P.: Upheaval buckling analysis of partially buried pipeline subjected to high pressure and high temperature. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2011-49498. ASME (2011). doi:10.1115/OMAE2011-49498

  • Berghe, V., et al.: Pipeline uplift mechanisms using finite element analysis. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp. 1801–1804. Millpress Science Publishers, Fugro Engineers SA, Brussels (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer, P.A., Sutjiadi, W.: The uplift resistance of shallow embedded anchors. In: Proceedings of the 11th Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, vol. 3, pp. 1635–1638 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., et al.: Mobilization distance for upheaval buckling of shallowly buried pipelines. J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. (2012). ASCE. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000099

  • White, D.J., et al.: Centrifuge modelling of upheaval buckling in sand. Int. J. Phys. Model. Geotech. (2001). doi:10.1680/ijpmg.2001.010202

  • Yimsiri, S., et al.: Lateral and upward soil-pipeline interactions in sand for deep embedment conditions. J. Geotech. Geoenvironmental Eng. (2004). ASCE. doi:10.1061/ASCE1090-02412008134:2154

  • Zeng, X., et al.: Critical upheaval buckling forces of imperfect pipelines. J. Appl. Ocean Res. (2014). Elsevier. doi:10.1016/j.apor.2014.01.001

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Beirut, P.O. Box 11-0236, Riad El-Solh, Beirut, 1107-2020, Lebanon

    Sahar Ismail, Shadi Najjar, Salah Sadek & Mounir Mabsout

Authors
  1. Sahar Ismail
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shadi Najjar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Salah Sadek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mounir Mabsout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sahar Ismail .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Rensselaer, New York, USA

    Tarek Abdoun

  2. University of Nevada, Reno , Reno, Nevada, USA

    Sherif Elfass

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ismail, S., Najjar, S., Sadek, S., Mabsout, M. (2018). Uplift Resistance of Offshore Pipelines Subject to Upheaval Buckling. In: Abdoun, T., Elfass, S. (eds) Soil Dynamics and Soil-Structure Interaction for Resilient Infrastructure. GeoMEast 2017. Sustainable Civil Infrastructures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63543-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation