Skip to main content

Hypothetical Microsimulation Modeling—Farm Taxation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Farm-Level Microsimulation Modelling
  • 346 Accesses

Abstract

Tax policy is often ignored driver of farm-level decision-making. However, special incentives within tax codes have important incentives for long-term investment decisions. In this chapter, we describe the development of a microsimulation model that abstracts from the population and behavioural complexity focusing primarily on the dimension of policy complexity, specifically considering the nature of taxation policy and household income-related cash transfers as these policies apply to farms. We consider the behavioural drivers on different farm-level decisions including land access and release, animal stocking rate decisions, intergenerational decisions such as succession and inheritance and farm investment decisions. This model is classified as a hypothetical microsimulation model as, for example, is used in the International Farm Comparison Network (IFCN). It focuses on stylised farm households, considering the change in the budget set or disposable income depending upon a decision in a specific dimension for a particular farm type. The model provides a useful advantage in being able to provide analysis to incorporate some degree of heterogeneity, while abstracting from full population heterogeneity, providing a useful analytical and communication device for farm policy decisions.

Co-authored with Cathal Geoghegan, Brian Leonard and Anne Kinsella.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahearn, M., Johnson, J., & Strickland, R. (1985). The distribution of income and wealth of farm operator households. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(5), 1087–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, E., & Stern, N. H. (1991). The theory and practice of tax reform in developing countries. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, F. G., Asheim, L. J., Mittenzwei, K., & Veggeland, F. (2002). Taxation of agriculture in selected countries. Oslo: Norwegian Agricultural Economics Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardazzi, R., Parisi, V., & Pazienza, M. G. (2016). Modelling direct and indirect taxes on firms: A policy simulation. Austrian Journal of Statistics, 33(1 & 2), 237–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berntsen, J., Petersen, B. M., Jacobsen, B. H., Olesen, J. E., & Hutchings, N. J. (2003). Evaluating nitrogen taxation scenarios using the dynamic whole farm simulation model FASSET. Agricultural Systems, 76(3), 817–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, A., & Beghin, J. C. (2009). How coupled are decoupled farm payments? A review of the evidence. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 130–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlacu, I., O’Donoghue, C., & Sologon, D. M. (2014). Hypothetical models. In C. O’Donoghue (Ed.), Handbook of microsimulation modelling. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buslei, Bach, H. S., & Simmler, M. (2014). Firm level models. In C. O’Donoghue, (Ed.), Handbook of Microsimulation (pp. 275–304).

    Google Scholar 

  • Casamatta, G., Rausser, G., & Simon, L. (2011). Optimal taxation with joint production of agriculture and rural amenities. Resource and Energy Economics, 33(3), 544–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daugbjerg, C. (1998). Power and policy design: A comparison of green taxation in Scandinavian agriculture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 21(3), 253–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (2014a). Agri taxation review: Report of the Agri Taxation Working Group to the Minister for Finance and the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine. Dublin: Minister for Finance and the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (2014b). CAP 2015: An introduction to direct payments. Dublin: DAFM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, P. A. T., Hennessy, T., Shalloo, L., Thorne, F., & Horan, B. (2008). Future outlook for the Irish dairy industry: A study of international competitiveness, influence of international trade reform and requirement for change. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 61, 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, T., Hanrahan, K., & Hennessy, T. (2008). Study on the functioning of land markets in the EU member states under the influence of measures applied under the Common Agricultural Policy (End of Project Report RMIS 5881). Athenry: Galway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucha, T., & Vaněk, D. (2006). Interactions between agricultural policy and multifunctionality in Czech agriculture. Coherence of Agricultural and Rural Development Policies, 239.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Silva, B. C., & El Badawi, I. (1988). Indirect and direct taxation of agriculture in Sudan: The role of the government in agriculture surplus extraction. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(2), 431–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A. F. (1969). The impact of taxation on agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 20(2), 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossen, F., & Bach, S. (2008). Reforming the German Local Business Tax-Lessons from an international comparison and a microsimulation analysis. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 64(2), 245–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan, C., & O’Donoghue, C. (2014). Socio-economic and demographic drivers of land mobility in Irish agriculture. Athenry: Rural Economic and Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan, C., Kinsella, A., & O’Donoghue, C. (2017). Institutional drivers of land mobility: The impact of CAP rules and tax policy on land mobility incentives in Ireland. Agricultural Finance Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamid, J. (1973). The problem of agricultural taxation in West Pakistan and an Alternative solution: A comment. The Pakistan Development Review, 12(3), 311–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanrahan, K., Hennessy, T., Kinsella, A., & Moran, B. (2014). Teagasc national farm survey results 2013. Athenry: Teagasc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heanue, K., & O’Donoghue, C. (2014). The economic returns to formal agricultural education. Carlow, Ireland: Teagasc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemme, T., Deblitz, C., Isermeyer, F., Knutson, R., & Anderson, D. (2000). The International Farm Comparison Network (IFCN)-objectives, organisation and first results on international competitiveness of dairy production. Züchtungskunde, 72(6), 428–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, B., & Cahill, C. (2007). Taxation of European Farmers La fiscalité des agriculteurs européens Die Besteuerung der Landwirte in Europa. EuroChoices, 6(1), 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, M. (2000). The distributional impact of direct payments on Irish farm incomes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 51(2), 252–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. H. (2001). Agricultural taxation in developing countries: A survey of issues and policy. Agricultural Economics, 24(3), 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. O., Schiff, M., & Valdés, A. (1988). Agricultural incentives in developing countries: Measuring the effect of sectoral and economywide policies. The World Bank Economic Review, 2(3), 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, B., Mahon, M., Kinsella, A., O’Donoghue, C., Farrell, M., Curran, T., et al. (2017). The potential of farm partnerships to facilitate farm succession and inheritance. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 6(1), 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. E., Hall, N. H., Savage, C. R., & Kingston, A. G. (1988). Taxation, cost of capital and investment in Australian agriculture. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 32(1), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. P. (1996). Measures of replacement rates for the purpose of international comparisons: A note. OECD Economic Studies, 26(1), 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, M., O’Donoghue, C., & Hynes, S. (2014). Trends in CAP over time: A hypothetical farm analysis. Paper presented to the Agricultural Economics Society of Ireland, Dublin, March 14th, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitton, L., Sutherland, H., & Weeks, M. (Eds.). (2000). Microsimulation modelling for policy analysis: Challenges and innovations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschini, G., & Sckokai, P. (1994). Efficiency of decoupled farm programs under distortionary taxation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(3), 362–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, C. (2014). Handbook of microsimulation modelling. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donoghue, C., & Sutherland, H. (1999). Accounting for the family in European income tax systems. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(5), 565–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, S., Shalloo, L., Butler, A. M., & Horan, B. (2008). A survey analysis of opportunities and limitations of Irish dairy farmers. Journal of Farm Management, 13(6), 419–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochorowicz, J., & Rusielik, R. (2007). Relative efficiency of oilseed crops production in the selected farms in Europe and the world in 2005. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj, K. (1973). Direct taxation of agriculture. Indian Economic Review, 8(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M., McCormack, M., O’Donoghue, C., & Upton, V. (2014). The role of subsidy payments in the uptake of forestry by the typical cattle farmer in Ireland from 1984 to 2012. Irish Forestry, 71(1 & 2), 92–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah, R. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1985). The taxation and pricing of agricultural and industrial goods in developing economies. In D. M. G. Newbery & N. H. Stern (Eds.), The theory of taxation for developing countries (pp. 426–461).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sazama, G. W., & Davis, H. (1973). Land taxation and land reform. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 21(4), 642–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sckokai, P., & Moro, D. (2009). Modelling the impact of the CAP single farm payment on farm investment and output. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 36(3), 395–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, J. (1991a). Prospects for agricultural land taxation in developing countries. The World Bank Economic Review, 5(3), 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, J. (1991b). If agricultural land taxation is so efficient, why is it so rarely used? The World Bank Economic Review, 5(1), 113–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, H., & Figari, F. (2013). EUROMOD: the European Union tax-benefit microsimulation model. International Journal of Microsimulation, 6(1), 4–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, F. S., & Fingleton, W. (2006). Examining the relative competitiveness of milk production: An Irish case study (1996–2004). Journal of International Farm Management, 3(4), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kooten, G. C., Binkley, C. S., & Delcourt, G. (1995). Effect of carbon taxes and subsidies on optimal forest rotation age and supply of carbon services. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(2), 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venn, J. A. (1928). The incidence of taxation in agriculture. The Economic Journal, 38(152), 560–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter-Nelson, A. (1997). Rural taxation in Ethiopia, 1981–1989: A policy analysis matrix assessment for net producers and net consumers. Food Policy, 22(5), 419–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, C., Holly Wang, H., & Shi, Q. (2012). Farmers’ income and production responses to rural taxation reform in three regions in China. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(2), 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zander, K., Thobe, P., & Nieberg, H. (2007). Economic impacts of the adoption of the Common Agricultural Policy on typical organic farms in selected new Member States. Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Agrarökonomie, 16, 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, Y., Ding, Y. B., & Zhao, S. J. (2012). Financial support for agriculture, taxation, inertia effect and the development of agricultural modernization. Journal of South China Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 2(3).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cathal O’Donoghue .

Appendix Policy Parameters

Appendix Policy Parameters

See Table 4.5

Table 4.5 Policy parameters

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

O’Donoghue, C. (2017). Hypothetical Microsimulation Modeling—Farm Taxation. In: Farm-Level Microsimulation Modelling. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63979-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63979-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-63978-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-63979-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics