Skip to main content

‘Understanding the World in Order to Change It’: What Might Food Sovereignty Look Like? Or, a Normative Political Ecology as Livelihood Sovereignty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Political Ecology, Food Regimes, and Food Sovereignty
  • 1517 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter brings this book to a conclusion by attempting to outline a normative political ecology, or a political ecology of praxis, the integration of the political and ecological lessons and principles drawn from the preceding chapters into a programme of counter-hegemonic transformation—the great socio-ecological transformation of the twenty-first century. This concluding chapter aligns with one of the three main commitments that Bridge et al. (Editors’ introduction. In: Perreault T, Bridge G, McCarthy J (eds) The Routledge handbook of political ecology. Routledge, London, pp 3–18, 2015, 8) suggest are defining characteristics of political ecology: that is, a normative political commitment to social justice and structural political change. Thus, ‘political ecology is an explicitly normative intellectual project, which has from its beginning highlighted the struggles, interests, and plight of marginalized populations: peasants, indigenous peoples, ethnic…minorities, women, the poor…Political ecologists thus seek not just to explain social and environmental processes, but to construct an alternative understanding of them, with an orientation towards social justice and radical politics’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amin, S. 2013. China 2013. Monthly Review 64 (10): 14–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Food Sovereignty and the Agrarian Question: Constructing Convergence of Struggles Within Diversity. In The Struggle for Food Sovereignty: Alternative Development and the Renewal of Peasant Societies Today, ed. R. Herrera and K.C. Lau, 14–34. London: Pluto Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. 2016. Marx at the Margins: On Nationalism, Ethnicity, and Non-Western Societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, H. 2010. The Class Dynamics of Agrarian Change. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, G., J. McCarthy, and T. Perreault. 2015. Editors’ Introduction. In The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology, ed. T. Perreault, G. Bridge, and J. McCarthy, 3–18. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chibber, V. 2013. Post-Colonial Theory and the Spectre of Capital. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Janvry, A. 1981. The Agrarian Question and Reformism in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. 2013. What Is a Peasant? What Are Peasantries? A Briefing Paper on Issues of Definition. Paper Prepared for the First Session of the Intergovernmental Working Group on a United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas, Geneva, 15–19 July 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M., and S.M. Borras. 2016. Political Dynamics of Transnational Agrarian Movements. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fabricant, N. 2012. Mobilizing Bolivia’s Displaced: Indigenous Politics and the Struggle Over Land. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky, K. 1988. The Agrarian Question. Vol. 1 and 2. London: Zwan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V.I. 1965. Collected Works. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D., and K. Derickson. 2012. From Resilience to Resourcefulness: A Critique of Resilience Policy and Activism. Progress in Human Geography 37 (2): 253–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooers, C. 1991. The Making of Bourgeois Europe: Absolutism, Revolution, and the Rise of Capitalism in England, France and Germany. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Imperial Subjects: Citizenship in an Age of Crisis and Empire. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, S. 2015. Rebuilding African Peasantries: Inalienability of Land Rights and Collective Food Sovereignty in Southern Africa? In The Struggle for Food Sovereignty: Alternative Development and the Renewal of Peasant Societies Today, ed. R. Herrera and K.C. Lau, 56–82. London: Pluto Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, R. 2011. What Does Food Sovereignty Look Like? In Food Sovereignty: Reconnecting Food, Nature and Community, ed. H. Wittman, A.A. Desmarais, and N. Wiebe, 186–195. Oxford: Pambazuka Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik, U. 2015. The Political-Economic Context for the Peasant Struggles for Livelihood Security and Land in India. In The Struggle for Food Sovereignty: Alternative Development and the Renewal of Peasant Societies Today, ed. R. Herrera and K.C. Lau, 109–118. London: Pluto Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto, I., J. Vandermeer, and A. Wright. 2009. Nature’s Matrix: Linking Agriculture, Conservation and Food Sovereignty. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. 1932. The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 1957. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Times. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilzey, M. 2001. Mapping UK Government Thinking on Neoliberalism and Globalization in Agriculture and the Environment. London: UK Food Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Global Politics, Capitalism, Socio-ecological Crisis, and Resistance: Exploring the Linkages and the Challenges. Colloquium Paper No. 14. Global Governance/Politics, Climate Justice & Agrarian/Social Justice: Linkages and Challenges: An International Colloquium 4–5 February 2016. ISS, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016b. Reintegrating Economy, Society, and Environment for Cooperative Futures: Polanyi, Marx, and Food Sovereignty. Journal of Rural Studies. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.12.004.

  • Van der Ploeg, J. 2008. The New Peasantries: Struggles for Autonomy and Sustainability in an Era of Empire and Globalization. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E. 1982. Europe and the Peoples Without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, E., and J.T. Sit. 2015. Rethinking ‘Rural China’, Unthinking Modernization: Rural Regeneration and Post-developmental Rural Agency. In The Struggle for Food Sovereignty: Alternative Development and the Renewal of Peasant Societies Today, ed. R. Herrera and K.C. Lau, 83–108. London: Pluto Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E.M. 1991. The Pristine Culture of Capitalism: An Historical Essay on Old Regimes and Modern States. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Empire of Capital. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2000. World Development Report 2000/1. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tilzey, M. (2018). ‘Understanding the World in Order to Change It’: What Might Food Sovereignty Look Like? Or, a Normative Political Ecology as Livelihood Sovereignty. In: Political Ecology, Food Regimes, and Food Sovereignty. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64556-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64556-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64555-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64556-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics