Skip to main content

Indigenous Challenges for Southern Criminology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and the Global South

Abstract

The chapter considers three challenges that Indigenous perspectives provide for Southern criminology: the importance of understanding colonialism and the coloniality of power; the role of Indigenous knowledges, epistemologies and methodologies; and the political questions that Indigenous peoples pose for settler colonial states. The chapter argues that criminology needs to be reconfigured to overcome its historical roots, its epistemological blind spots and its politically compromised positions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Cunneen and Tauri (2016: 63–64) for a discussion of the American Indian Movement (AIM) in the USA and the establishment of the first Aboriginal Legal Service (ALS) in Australia.

  2. 2.

    In the USA see the Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development (http://hpaied.org/) and the Native Nations Institute at the University of Arizona (http://nni.arizona.edu/). In Australia see Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, ‘Indigenous Community Governance’ (http://caepr.anu.edu.au/governance/index.php); University of Technology Sydney, ‘Nation Building Project’ (https://www.uts.edu.au/research-and-teaching/our-research/jumbunna/our-research/projects/nation-building-project); University of Melbourne, ‘Indigenous Nation Building’ (http://government.unimelb.edu.au/research/research-theme-governance-and-performance/research-project-indigenous-nation-building).

References

  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner [ATSISJC]. (2002). Social Justice Report 2002. Sydney: Australian Human Rights Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner [ATSISJC]. (2011). Social Justice Report 2011. Sydney: Australian Human Rights Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agozino, B. (2003). Counter-Colonial Criminology: A Critique of Imperialist Reason. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. (2007). American Indian executions in historical context. Criminal Justice Studies: A Critical Journal of Crime, Law, and Society, 20(4), 315–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786010701758138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battiste, M. (1998). Enabling the Autumn seed: Toward a decolonised approach to Aboriginal knowledge, language, and education. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 22(1), 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battiste, M. (2000). Maintaining Aboriginal identity, language, and culture in modern society. In M. Battiste (Ed.), Reclaiming Indigenous Voice and Vision (pp. 192–208). Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battiste, M. (2005). Indigenous Knowledge: Foundations for First Nations. Retrieved from https://www2.viu.ca/integratedplanning/documents/IndegenousKnowledgePaperbyMarieBattistecopy.pdf

  • Behrendt, L., Cunneen, C., & Libesman, T. (2009). Indigenous Legal Relations in Australia. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagg, H. (2008). Crime, Aboriginality and the Decolonisation of Justice. Annandale: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrows, J. (2010). Canada’s Indigenous Constitution. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2005). That heavy machine: Reprising the colonial apparatus in 21st-century social control. Social Justice, 32(1), 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2014). Penal Power and Colonial Rule. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carjuzza, J., & Ruff, W. G. (2010). When Western epistemology and an Indigenous worldview meet: Culturally responsive assessment in practice. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 68–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, K., Hogg, R., & Sozzo, M. (2016). Southern criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 56(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, S. (2015). ‘Wolves have a constitution’: Continuities in Indigenous self-government. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 6(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, S., & Kalt, J. P. (2007). Two approaches to the development of Native nations: One works, the other doesn’t. In M. Jorgensen (Ed.), Rebuilding Native Nations (pp. 3–33). Tuscon: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C. (2001). Conflict, Politics and Crime: Aboriginal Communities and the Police. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C. (2017). Visual power and sovereignty: Indigenous art and colonialism. In M. Brown & E. Carrabine (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Visual Criminology (pp. 376–388). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., Baldry, E., Brown, D., Brown, M., Schwartz, M., & Steel, A. (2013). Penal Culture and Hyperincarceration: The Revival of the Prison. Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., & Rowe, S. (2015). Decolonising Indigenous victimisation. In D. Wilson & S. Ross (Eds.), Crime, Victims and Policy: International Contexts, Local Experiences (pp. 10–32). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., Rowe, S., & Tauri, J. (2017). Fracturing the colonial paradigm: Indigenous epistemologies and methodologies. Method(e)s: African Review of Social Sciences Methodology. Special Issue: Epistemological Fractures in a Globalised World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C., & Tauri, J. (2016). Indigenous Criminology. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalea, R., & Robertson, S. (2004). Interview with Boaventura de Sousa Santos. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 2(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767720410001733629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. Y. (1998). Racialized punishment and prison abolition. In J. James (Ed.), The Angela Y Davis Reader (pp. 96–107). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa Santos, B. (2007, June 29). Beyond abyssal thinking. Eurozine. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from http://www.eurozine.com/journals/revista-critica-de-ciencias-sociais/page/5/

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Introduction. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies (pp. 1–20). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. S., & Smith, L. T. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dziedzic, A., & McMillan, M. (2016). Australian Indigenous constitutions: Recognition and renewal. Federal Law Review, 44, 337–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (2004 [1961]). The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnane, M. (1997). Punishment in Australian Society. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Go, J. (2013). Introduction: Entangling postcoloniality and sociological thought. In J. Go (Ed.), Political Power and Social Theory (Vol. 24, pp. 3–31). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, M. A. (2010). Indigenous worldviews, knowledge, and research: The development of an Indigenous research paradigm. Journal of Indigenous Voices in Social Work, 1(1), 1–16. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10125/15117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (2014). A Maori constitutional tradition. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, 12(1), 187–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kercher, B. (1995). An Unruly Child. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L., & Steinberg, S. R. (2008). Indigenous knowledges in education: Complexities, dangers and profound benefits. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln, & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies (pp. 135–156). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitossa, T. (2012). Criminology and colonialism: Counter colonial criminology and the Canadian context. The Journal of Pan African Studies, 4(10), 204–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M., & McBride, K. (2011). Political Theories of Decolonization: Postcolonialism and the Problem of Foundations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations, and Contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfoot, S. (2012). Selective endorsement without intent to implement: Indigenous rights and the Anglosphere. The International Journal of Human Rights, 16(1), 100–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2012.622139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, R. P. (2007). Can you hear us now? Voices from the Margin: Using Indigenous methodologies in geographic research. Geographical Research, 45(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00443.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreton-Robinson, A. (2000). Talkin’ Up to the White Woman: Indigenous Women and Feminism. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreton-Robinson, A. (2015). The White Possessive. Property, Power and Indigenous Sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moreton-Robinson, A., & Walter, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies in social research. In M. Walter (Ed.), Social Research Methods (pp. 95–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, W. (2006). Criminology, Civilisation and the New World Order. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from their Families (NISATSIC). (1997). Bringing Them Home. Sydney: Australian Human Rights Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porsanger, J. (2004). An Essay About Indigenous Methodology. Retrieved March 6, 2017, from http://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlit/article/viewFile/1910/1776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. (2016). Decolonising policing: Indigenous night patrols, counter-policing and safety. Theoretical Criminology, 20(4), 548–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480615625763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 168–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, L. (1999). Internationalisation of an Indigenous anticolonial cultural critique of research methodologies: A guide to Indigenist research methodology and its principles. Wicazo Sa Review, 14(2), 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, L. (2001). A First Perspective of Indigenous Australian Participation in Science: Framing Indigenous Research Towards Indigenous Australian Intellectual Sovereignty. Retrieved March 3, 2017, from https://ncis.anu.edu.au/_lib/doc/LI_Rigney_First_perspective.pdf

  • Roy, E. (2017, March 16). New Zealand river granted same human rights as human being. The Guardian. Retrieved March 17, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/16/new-zealand-river-granted-same-legal-rights-as-human-being

  • Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271–313). London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). (2009). State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivian, A., & Longman, C. (2014). What would genuine ‘evidence-based policy’ Look like in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Right Now. Human Rights in Australia. Retrieved March 10, 2017, from http://rightnow.org.au/opinion-3/what-would-genuine-evidence-based-policy-look-like-in-relation-to-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-people/

  • Wacquant, L. (2001). Deadly symbiosis: When ghetto and prison meet and mesh. Punishment and Society, 1(2), 95–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624740122228276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2010). Class, race and hyperincarceration in Revanchist America. Daedalus, 140(3), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, M. (2010). The politics of the data: How the Australian statistical Indigene is constructed. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies, 3(2), 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, M. (2016). Indigenous peoples, research and ethics. In M. Adorjan & R. Ricciardelli (Eds.), Engaging with Ethics in International Criminological Research (pp. 87–105). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, M., & Andersen, C. (2013). Indigenous Statistics: A Quantitative Methodology. Los Angeles: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherburn, D. (2014). Arresting Incarceration: Pathways out of Indigenous Imprisonment. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

Human Rights Instruments

  • United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UN) (2007).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cunneen, C. (2018). Indigenous Challenges for Southern Criminology. In: Carrington, K., Hogg, R., Scott, J., Sozzo, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65021-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65021-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65020-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65021-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics