Skip to main content

Access and Closure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery

Abstract

When addressing endovascular procedures, complication avoidance is often aimed at the critical portions of a procedure where the risk for a catastrophic outcome is the highest, for example, when deploying a framing coil in a ruptured aneurysm or delivering a liquid embolic to a potential area of eloquent cortex adjacent to an AVM. A perfectly framed aneurysm can be a satisfying result for both the interventionalist and the patient, but this success is easily belittled when access site complications occur at the beginning or end of an endovascular procedure. Formidable complications, such as the loss of a limb, or even the need for unplanned rescue procedures or surgeries required to treat the complications, are avoidable with prudent preparation from the interventionalist. This chapter will address complication avoidance in arteriotomy site access and closure, as well as management when these unfortunate outcomes manifest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lee DH, et al. Routine transradial access for conventional cerebral angiography: a single operator's experience of its feasibility and safety. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(922):831–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levy EI, et al. Transradial cerebral angiography: an alternative route. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(2):335–40. Discussion 340–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nohara AM, Kallmes DF. Transradial cerebral angiography: technique and outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(6):1247–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amin FR, et al. Femoral haemostasis after transcatheter therapeutic intervention: a prospective randomised study of the angio-seal device vs. the femostop device. Int J Cardiol. 2000;76(2–3):235–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Biancari F, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of vascular closure devices after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. Am Heart J. 2010;159(4):518–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cremonesi A, et al. Femoral arterial hemostasis using the angio-seal feminine system after coronary and vascular percutaneous angioplasty and stenting. J Invasive Cardiol. 1998;10(8):464–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Das R, et al. Arterial closure devices versus manual compression for femoral haemostasis in interventional radiological procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34(4):723–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kapadia SR, et al. The 6Fr Angio-Seal arterial closure device: results from a multimember prospective registry. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87(6):789–91, A8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kussmaul WG III, et al. Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25(7):1685–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nikolsky E, et al. Vascular complications associated with arteriotomy closure devices in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(6):1200–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pollard SD, et al. Position and Mobilisation Post-Angiography Study (PAMPAS): a comparison of 4.5 hours and 2.5 hours bed rest. Heart. 2003;89(4):447–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Schickel SI, et al. Achieving femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization: a comparison of methods. Am J Crit Care. 1999;8(6):406–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu PJ, et al. Access site complications following transfemoral coronary procedures: comparison between traditional compression and angioseal vascular closure devices for haemostasis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015;15:34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cox N, Resnic FS, Popma JJ, et al. Managing the femoral artery in coronary angiography. Heart Lung Circ. 2008;17(Suppl.4):S65–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Deshaies EM, Eddleman CS, et al. Handbook of neuroendovascular surgery: Chapter 10. Endovascular complications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Paul Singh M.D., M.P.H .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thabet, A.M., Singh, I.P. (2018). Access and Closure. In: Gandhi, C., Prestigiacomo, C. (eds) Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65206-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65206-1_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65204-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65206-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics