Skip to main content

Dealing with the Intimate Enemy: Civil Society and Ethno-Religious Conflict in Contemporary India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Expressions of Radicalization

Abstract

Civil society, once boasting its democratic contribution, is now undermining the secular-democratic culture of India. Based on ethnographic fieldwork, this chapter examines the role of Rajasthan Vanvasi Kalyan Parishad (RVKP), a Hindu nationalist organization, among the Bhil tribes of Rajasthan. The chapter argues that the RVKP has implemented several developmental projects as a medium to gain people’s trust. By claiming to represent tribal interests, the RVKP has established itself as a “counterforce” against local Muslims and Christians and projected them as the “threatening others”. In this regard, it has received economic and politico-legal support from the state of Rajasthan, which is governed by the Hindu nationalists. The chapter concludes that the exclusivist politics of the RVKP and the Hindu nationalist state in Rajasthan have not only created a insecurity amongst the religious minorities; they have also radically polarized the public life and threatened the secular-democratic ethos of Indian society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to the 2001 census, there are about 573 tribes with a population of 84.3 million constituting 8.2% of the country’s population. It is the second largest tribal population in the world, next only to Africa.

  2. 2.

    Hinduism, Islam , Christianity, Jainism, Buddhism, Sikhism, Judaism, and Zoroastrianism.

  3. 3.

    The RSS was founded in 1925 by K.B. Hedegewar in Nagpur with two major objectives: first, to counter Muslim separatism and British colonialism , and second, to unite the Hindu community to form a Hindu Rashtra (Hindu nation). It drew inspiration from European right-wing groups during the Second World War.

  4. 4.

    The membership in RSS is much larger than mentioned by Jayal because as Deo (2007: 145) states, even in a small state like Orissa, the Sangh Parivar boasts a reach of over a million members.

  5. 5.

    According to Sangh organizational principles, “a shakha is meant to be the place where, led by the shakha instructor, swayamsewaks (volunteers or local-level workers) gather daily in the early hours of the morning and evening for their ideological and political education. They follow a regimen of physical and ideological training consisting of drills, games, and debates about national and local sociopolitical questions” (Chaturvedi 2011: 345–346).

  6. 6.

    According to Freedom House (2015: 8), since 1974 the number of democratic political systems has more than tripled from 39 to 125 as of 2015.

  7. 7.

    The Criminal Tribes Act enacted by the British in 1871 “placed restrictions on wandering, nomadic groups, many of whom were either newly landless tribals or former pastoralists and traders (such as the Bhanjaras), the indigent poor of the colonial system, some of whom had participated in the uprising of 1857…The oldest males in families of the specified ‘criminal tribes and castes ’ were required under this law to report on a weekly basis to the local police , to inform them of their whereabouts. The purpose was to dissuade them from vagrancy and criminal activities, to which they were regarded as being inherently inclined, as some quite probably were, although the reasons were practical rather than genetic” (Bates 2007: 81).

  8. 8.

    Bhil, Mina, Damor, Kathodi, Garasia, and Sahriya.

  9. 9.

    Hindu nationalism , represented predominantly through the RSS , uses a saffron-coloured flag as their quintessential symbol. Therefore, in academic literature “saffron” refers to the radical ideology of the Hindu nationalism.

  10. 10.

    Previously, the BJP government had introduced the Rajasthan Dharma Swatantraya (Religious Freedom) Bill in the State Assembly. The governor refused to approve it, however, and returned the bill to the state government in May 2006 because it violated the fundamental rights to religion of the individual.

  11. 11.

    According to Vandevelde (2011: 35), “the first well-organized and widely-known attempt at reconversion to Hinduism was made roughly between 1880 and 1930 by the Hindu nationalist movement the Arya Samaj (Society of Nobles), founded by Swami Dayanand Sarasvati in 1875 and centred in Punjab”.

References

Bibliography

  • Anonymous. 2002. Investigation: A Communal Cult. Islamic Voice, January, 15-01 (181). Accessed 18 October 2006. http://www.islamicvoice.com/january.2002/investigation.htm

  • ———. 2007. Christian Preacher Attacked in Jaipur. The Hindu, 30 April. Accessed 20 April 2017. http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/Christian-preacher-attacked-in-Jaipur/article14756890.ece

  • ———. 2008. Religious Freedom Bill Passed in Rajasthan. The Hindu, 21 March. Accessed 20 April 2017. http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/Religious-Freedom-Bill-passed-in-Rajasthan/article15188629.ece

  • Bates, C. 2007. Subalterns and Raj: South Asia since 1600. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S. 1997. Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic. World Politics 49 (3): 401–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beteille, A. 1999. Citizenship, State and Civil Society. Economic and Political Weekly 34 (36): 2588–2591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari, L, and M. Chakraborty. 2015. Some Elements of  Spatial Poverty in Rajasthan. Live Mint, 9 February. Accessed 24 November 2016. http://www.livemint.com/Opinion/NnbnMlJYLlPoehSEpepbFL/Some-elements-ofspatial-poverty-in-Rajasthan.html

  • Bordia, D. 2015. The Ethics of Des Seva: Hindu Nationalism, Tribal Leadership and Modes of Sociality in Rajasthan. Contributions to Indian Sociology 49 (1): 52–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandhoke, N. 1995. State and Civil Society: Explorations in Political Theory. Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. The ‘Civil’ and the ‘Political’ in Civil Society. Democratization 8 (2): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi, R. 2011. ‘Somehow it Happened’: Violence, Culpability, and the Hindu Nationalist Community. Cultural Anthropology 26 (3): 340–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. 2008. Authoring (in)Authenticity, Regulating Religious Tolerance: The Implications of Anti-Conversion Legislation for Indian Secularism. Cultural Dynamics 20 (3): 245–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deo, N. 2007. Structure and Strategies: Two Faces of Civic Activism in India. Journal of Civil Society 3 (2): 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. 1999. Developing Democracy: Towards Consolidation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. 2015. Freedom in the World. New York: Freedom House Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghassem-Fachandi, P. 2012. Pogrom in Gujarat: Hindu Nationalism and Anti-Muslim Violence in India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, D. 2000. Culture, Space and the Nation-State. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T.B. 1999. The Saffron Wave: Democracy and Hindu Nationalism in Modern India. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hardiman, D. 2006. Healing Bodies, Saving Souls: Medical Missions in Asia and Africa. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, J. 2002. Depoliticising Development: The World Bank and Social Capital. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffrelot, C. 1996. The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics: 1925 to the 1990s. London: Hurst & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. India: The Politics of (Re)Conversion to Hinduism of Christian Aboriginals. In Annual Review of the Sociology of Religion: Volume 2, ed. P. Michel and E. Pace, 197–215. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayal, N.G. 2001. India. In Governance and Civil Society in a Global Age, ed. Y. Tadashi and K.G. Ashizawa, 116–153. Tokyo: Japan Centre for International Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. The Role of Civil Society. In The State of India’s Democracy, ed. S. Ganguly, 143–160. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, P. 2010. Hindutva’s Discourse on Development. In Religion, Community and Development, ed. G. Mahajan and S.S. Jodhka, 83–101. Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, R. 2005. Mythology of Communal Violence: An Introduction. In Religion, Violence and Political Mobilization in South Asia, ed. R. Kaur, 19–45. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaviraj, S. 2001. In Search of Civil Society. In Civil Society: History and Possibilities, ed. S. Kaviraj and S. Khilnani, 287–323. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krygier, M. 1996. The Sources of Civil Society. Second Richard Krygier Memorial Lecture, Melbourne, 29 August. Accessed 20 April 2017. http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/backgroundbriefing/the-sources-of-civil-society/3563756#transcript

  • Lodha, S. 2004. Rajasthan: India Shines as BJP Trounces Congress. Economic and Political Weekly. December 18: 5456–5462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallampalli, C. 2004. Christians and Public Life in Colonial South India, 1863–1937: Contending with Marginality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, C., and S. Moskalenko. 2008. Mechanisms of Political Radicalization: Pathways toward Terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 20 (3): 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, K.D. 2003. Converted Innocents and their Trickster Heroes: The Politics of Proselytizing in India. In The Anthropology of Religious Conversion, ed. A. Buckser and S.D. Glazier, 43–53. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudgal, V. 2004. Losing a Winning Hand. Seminar, No. 534. Accessed 20 April 2017. http://www.india-seminar.com/2004/534/534%20vipul%20mudgal.htm

  • Neumann, P., and S. Kleinmann. 2013. How Rigorous is Radicalization Research? Democracy and Security 9 (4): 360–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R., R. Leonardi, and R.Y. Nanetti. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • RSS Rastriya Swayamsevak Sangh. 2008. 30 January. Accessed 20 April 2017. http://orkut.google.com/c2623078-t79cf390aecbe35ef.html

  • RVKP. 1994. Bappa Rawal. Udaipur: RVKP Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. RVKP Booklet. Udaipur: RVKP Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Bappa Rawal. Udaipur: RVKP Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo, S. 2013a. Civil Society and Democratization in India: Institutions, Ideologies and Interests. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. Doing Development or Creating Dependency? NGOs and Civil Society in India. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 36 (2): 258–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Civil Society and Democratization: A Counter-Case from India. Democratization 21 (3): 480–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Religious Violence and the ‘Developmental State’ in Rajasthan. In Perspectives on Violence and Othering in India, ed. R.C. Tripathi and P. Singh, 175–194. New Delhi: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, D.L. 1995. Democracy and Globalization in India: Post-Cold War Discourse. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 540: 24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D.K. 2004. Rajasthan: Draws Adivasis into the Hindu Fold. Communalism Combat, 11 (102).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar, V. 1999. A Numbers Game. Frontline, 16 (25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thachil, T. 2011. Embedded Mobilization: Nonstate Service Provision as Electoral Strategy in India. World Politics 63 (3): 434–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valini, A.A. 2010. Physical Training, Ethical Discipline, and Creative Violence. Cultural Anthropology 25 (1): 73–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandevelde, I. 2011. Reconversion to Hinduism: A Hindu Nationalist Reaction against Conversion to Christianity and Islam. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 34 (1): 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisgrau, M. 2013. Rajasthan: Anthropological Perspectives on Tribal Identity. In The Modern Anthropology of India, ed. P. Berger and F. Heidemann, 242–259. London, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, S.I. 2007. Introduction. In Religious Politics and Communal Violence, ed. S.I. Wilkinson. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, R., and F. Heidemann. 2014. Indigeneity, Performance, and the State in South Asia and Beyond. Asian Ethnology 73 (1–2): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

Interviews

  • Interview 1. RVKP activist in Kotra, 20 September 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview 2. Teacher at the Modern School in Kotra, 23 September 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview 3. RVKP activist in Kolyari, 25 October 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview 4. Pastor in Jhadol, 26 November 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview 5. Journalist in Kotra Interview, 29 January 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sahoo, S. (2018). Dealing with the Intimate Enemy: Civil Society and Ethno-Religious Conflict in Contemporary India. In: Steiner, K., Önnerfors, A. (eds) Expressions of Radicalization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65566-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics