Skip to main content

What Determines Outcome in Patients That Suffer Raised Intracranial Pressure After Traumatic Brain Injury?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intracranial Pressure & Neuromonitoring XVI

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 126))

Abstract

Introduction: Episodes of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are responsible for the majority of secondary brain injury events and thereby strongly affect long-term outcome. However, not all patients with major episodes of raised ICP suffer a poor outcome. The aim of the current analysis was to identify variables contributing to good outcome in patients suffering episodes of high ICP.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 20 severe TBI patients admitted to the University Hospitals Leuven between 2010 and 2014. All patients had at least one episode of ICP > 30 mmHg for more than 3 min in succession. Outcome was assessed by the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 months. Partial least squares (PLS) regression was used to derive factors determining outcome. Pressure reactivity index (PRx) was calculated as an index for cerebrovascular autoregulation capacity.

Results: Both outcome groups did not differ for age, Glasgow Coma Score, pupil reactivity, computed tomography Marshall classification, glycaemia, haemoglobin and CRASH and IMPACT scores on admission. Significant differences were found for mean ICP, number of episodes of ICP > 30 mmHg, number and duration of longest PRx episodes. The number of episodes of ICP > 30 mmHg correlated significantly with the number and duration of longest PRx episodes. PLS regression indicates that episodes of impaired autoregulation contributed equally to explaining outcome compared to episodes of raised ICP.

Conclusions: Prolonged episodes of disturbed dynamic cerebral autoregulation contribute to detrimental outcome in patients with increased ICP. Autoregulation seems to have an important protective role in tolerating episodes of raised ICP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stocchetti N, AIR M. Traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2121–30. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24869722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Güiza F, Depreitere B, Piper I, Citerio G, Chambers I, Jones PA, et al. Visualizing the pressure and time burden of intracranial hypertension in adult and paediatric traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(6):1067–76. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00134-015-3806-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. MRC CRASH Trial Collaborators, Perel P, Arango M, Clayton T, Edwards P, Komolafe E, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ. 2008;336:425–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, Butcher I, Lu J, McHugh GS, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med. 2008;5:1251–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Laing RJ, Menon D, Pickard JD. Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury. Neurosurgery. 1997;41:11–7. discussion 17–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9218290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Howells T, Elf K, Jones PA, Ronne-Engström E, Piper I, Nilsson P, et al. Pressure reactivity as a guide in the treatment of cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with brain trauma. J Neurosurg. 2005;102:311–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Steiner LA, Czosnyka M, Piechnik SK, et al. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity allows determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:733–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11940737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aries MJH, Czosnyka M, Budohoski KP, Steiner LA, Lavinio A, Kolias AG, et al. Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2456–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pesek M, Kibler K, Easley RB, Mytar J, Rhee C, Andropoulos D, et al. The upper limit of cerebral blood flow autoregulation is decreased with elevations in intracranial pressure. Neurosurgery. 2014;75:163–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gustafsson A, Johnson MD. Determining attribute importance in a service satisfaction model. J Serv Res. 2004;7:124–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Patrick Klein M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Klein, S.P., Depreitere, B. (2018). What Determines Outcome in Patients That Suffer Raised Intracranial Pressure After Traumatic Brain Injury?. In: Heldt, T. (eds) Intracranial Pressure & Neuromonitoring XVI. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 126. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65797-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65798-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics