Abstract
Previous literature has shown that land use regulations influence where people choose to live within the United States by impacting housing prices. In this chapter, we study the impact of these same regulations on another component of population growth-fertility rates. First, we employ a dataset on the stringency of land restrictions using court based measures created by Ganong and Shoag (Why has regional income divergence in the U.S. declined?.Journal of Urban Economics, in press). We add to this separate cross-sectional measures of land use regulations from the American Institute of Planners, the Wharton Urban Decentralization Project survey, and the Wharton Residential Land Use Regulation Index (WRLURI). Combining this data with fertility data from the CDC and the Survey of Epidemiology and End Results data, we explore the impact of land use regulations on fertility at both the state and county level. We find a significant negative relationship between land use restrictions and fertility rates across all measures and geographies. Specifically, we find that land use regulations reduce fertility rates for teens and women in their 20’s while increasing the fertility rate for women in their 30’s or older to a lesser degree.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bosselman, F., & Callies D. (1971).The quiet revolution in land use control. White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Davis, M., & Heathcote J. (2004).The price and quantity of residential land in the United States. Discussion Paper No. 2004-37, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Finance and Economics.
Davis, M. A., & Palumbo, M. G. (2008). The price of residential land in large US cities.Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 352–384.
Ellickson, R. C. (1977). Suburban growth controls: An economic and legal analysis.The Yale Law Journal, 6(3), 385–511.
Fischel, W. A. (1989).Do growth controls matter?: A review of empirical evidence on the effectiveness and efficiency of local government land use regulation. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Fischel, W. (2004). An economic history of zoning and a cure for its exclusionary effects.Urban Studies, 41(2), 317–340.
Ganong, P., & Shoag, D. (in press). Why has regional income divergence in the U.S. declined?.Journal of Urban Economics.
Glaeser, E., & Gyourko J. (2017). The economic implications of housing supply.Zell/Lurie Working Paper 802.
Glaeser, E. L., Gyourko, J., & Saks, R. (2005a). Why is Manhattan so expensive? Regulation and the rise in House Prices.Journal of Law and Economics, 48, 1–50.
Glaeser, E. L., Gyourko, J., & Saks, R. E. (2005b). Urban growth and housing supply.Journal of Economic Geography, 6(1), 71–89.
Glaeser, E., & Tobio, K. (2008). The rise of the sunbelt.Southern Economic Journal, 74(3), 610–643.
Gyourko, J., Mayer, C., & Sinai, T. (2013). Superstar cities.American Economic Journal-Economic Policy, 5(4), 167–199.
Gyourko, J., & Molloy, R. (2015). Regulation and housing supply. In G. Duranton, J. Vernon Henderson, & W. Strange (Eds.),Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 5b). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Gyourko, J., & Saiz, A. (2006). Construction costs and the supply of housing structure.Journal of Regional Science, 46(6), 627–660.
Gyourko, J., Saiz, A., & Summers, A. A. (2008). A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets: The Wharton residential land use regulatory index.Urban Studies, 45(3), 693–721.
Hwang, M., & Quigley, J. M. (2006). Economic fundamentals in local housing markets: Evidence from US Metropolitan regions.Journal of Regional Science, 46(3), 425–453.
Popper, F. J. (1988). Understanding American land use regulation since 1970: A revisionist interpretation.Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(3), 291–301.
Quigley, J., & Raphael, S. (2005). Regulation and the high cost of housing in California.American Economic Review, 95(2), 323–328.
Saiz, A. (2010). The geographic determinants of housing supply.Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1253–1296.
Saks, R. (2008). Job creation and housing construction: Constraints on Metropolitan area employment growth.Journal of Urban Economics, 64, 178–195.
Shoag, D., & Muehlegger, E. (2015). Commuting times and land use regulations.Procedia Engineering, 107, 488–493.
Taylor, J., & Williams, N. (2009).American land planning law: Land use and the police power. Eagan, MN: West Group.
The American Institute of Planners. (1976).Survey of state land use planning activity.
Tolbert, C. M., & Sizer M. (1996).US commuting zones and labor market areas. Rural Economy Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Staff Paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shoag, D., Russell, L. (2018). Land Use Regulations and Fertility Rates. In: Lehavi, A. (eds) One Hundred Years of Zoning and the Future of Cities . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66869-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66869-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66868-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66869-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)