Skip to main content

Analysis of Benefits for Knowledge Workers Expected from Knowledge-Graph-Based Information Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems: Research, Development, Applications, Education (SIGSAND/PLAIS 2017)

Abstract

The paper raises the issues of Knowledge Workers job and the Knowledge Management Information Systems (KMIS) that support it. The first objective of the paper is to define the notions Knowledge Worker and KMIS - in the form of concept maps. In the paper, the knowledge actions conducted by the Knowledge Workers are also analyzed and the most frequently performed actions are distinguished. The two actions - analysis and information organization, are used as the basis for examination of KMIS quality in terms of Knowledge Workers support. A case study of Moodle platform as a KMIS supporting actions of Knowledge Workers in higher education justifies the conclusions of the support quality of traditional KMIS. With the objective to suggest improvement of the KMIS the authors introduce a design approach for Knowledge-Graph-based Information Systems (KGIS) and describe the general benefits of them, again referring to such knowledge actions as analysis and information organization. The paper also covers the limitations that might relate to a broad implementation of KGIS, connected with infrastructure, technology, organization, and media effects. At the end, the authors present another small case study dealing with the expected support quality of a semantic IT service catalog, prototypically implemented in a German higher education institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Working Knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sajeva, S.: The analysis of key elements of socio-technical knowledge management system. In: Economics and Management, pp. 765–774 (2010). ISSN 1822-6515

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hoq, M.G.K., Akter, R.: Knowledge management in Universities: role of knowledge workers. Bangladesh Journal of Library and Information Science 2(1), 92–102 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohanta, G.C., Kannan, V., Thooyamani, K.P.: Strategies for Improving Productivity of Knowledge Workers - An Overview. Strength Based Strategies, India (2006). http://strengthbasedstrategies.com/papers.htm

  5. Laha, A.: A Theoretical Foundation for Building Knowledge-Work Support Systems. SETLabs, Hyderabad (2008). http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5386

  6. Drucker, P.F.: Managing in a Time of Great Change. Truman Talley Books/Dutton, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reinhardt, W., Schmidt, B., Sloep, P., Drachsler, H.: Knowledge worker roles and actions – results of two empirical studies. Knowl. Process Manage. 18(3), 150–174 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Morello, D., Caldwell, F.: What Are Knowledge Workers? What Makes Them Thick? Gartner Group Research, Note SPA-12-7780 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davenport, T.H.: Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performances and Results from Knowledge Workers. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Figurska, I.: Knowledge workers engagement in work in theory and practice. Hum. Res. Manage. Ergonomic 2(9), 43–59 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Serrat, O.: Managing Knowledge Workers. Asian Development Bank, Washington (2008). http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/intl/146/

  12. Skrzypek, E.: Creativity of Knowledge Workers and Their Impact on Innovativeness of Enterprises (in Polish) (2009). http://www.instytut.info/Vkonf/site/32.pdf

  13. Rizun, M.: Moodle platform as a knowledge management system: results of a questionnaire research. Econ. Stud. Sci. J. Univ. Econ. Katowice, Inf. Econometrics 296(6), 49–63 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Probst, G., Raub, S., Romhardt, K.: Wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen, 6th edn. Gabler Fachverlag, Wiesbaden (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maier, R., Hädrich, T.: Centralized versus peer-to-peer knowledge management systems. Mastering Knowl. Organ. Challenges Practices Prospects 13(1), 47–61 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wikipedia Deutschland Analyse (2017). https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analyse

  17. Allemang, D., Hendler, J.: Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist: Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, Boston (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stokman, F.N., de Vries, P.H.: Structuring knowledge in a graph. In: van der Veer, C.G., Mulder, G. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction: Psychonomic Aspects, pp. 186–206. Springer, Heidelberg (1988). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-73402-1_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Pujara, J., Miao, H., Getoor, L., Cohen, W.: Knowledge Graph Identification. In: Alani, H., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8218, pp. 542–557. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41335-3_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Blumauer, A.: From Taxonomies over Ontologies to Knowledge Graphs - The Semantic Puzzle (2014). https://blog.semantic-web.at/2014/07/15/

  22. Miao, Q., Meng, Y., Zhang, B.: Chinese enterprise knowledge graph construction based on Linked Data. In: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Semantic Computing, IEEE ICSC 2015, Anaheim, California, pp. 153–154 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Galkin, M., Auer, S., Scerri, S.: Enterprise knowledge graphs: a survey. In: 37th International Conference on Information Systems (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Paulheim, H.: Knowledge graph refinement: a survey of approaches and evaluation methods. In: Semantic Web, pp. 1–20 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meister, V.G., Jetschni, J., Kreideweiß, S.: Konzept und Prototyp einer dezentralen Wissensinfrastruktur zu Hochschuldaten für Mensch und Maschine (accapted to: Workshop Hochschule 2027 im Rahmen der 47. GI Jahrestagung, Chemnitz) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gartner: Gartner’s 2016 Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies Identifies Three Key Trends That Organizations Must Track to Gain Competitive Advantage (2016). http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3412017

  27. Meister, V.G., Jetschni, J.: Umsetzungskonzepte und Nutzen von IT-Dienste-Katalogen für die IT-Versorgung in Organisationen – Eine Fallstudie im Hochschulumfeld. In: Angewandte Forschung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik. 28. Jahrestagung des AKWI, Luzern, pp. 141–151 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Saaty, T.L., Vargas, L.G.: Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Springer, New York (2012). doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariia Rizun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rizun, M., Meister, V.G. (2017). Analysis of Benefits for Knowledge Workers Expected from Knowledge-Graph-Based Information Systems. In: Wrycza, S., Maślankowski, J. (eds) Information Systems: Research, Development, Applications, Education. SIGSAND/PLAIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 300. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66996-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics