Skip to main content

Abstract

Do we need new terms?—Coevolution or sustainable development—The rate of the innovative process and the speed at which “natural technologies” are formed—“Human activities mean one thing for the biosphere—disruption”—Questions for which there are no answers—Evolution of the biosphere “in a human direction” of humans “in the direction of the biosphere”—What is really behind the term “noosphere?”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Examples of destroyed ecosystem restoration, such as putting down forests in place of tree farms, clearing obstructions from springs, etc., naturally do not belong to this category, since they are based on the application of natural, biotic means rather than technological ones. These more likely demonstrate to us the possibilities of “natural reconstruction” through the power of nature itself, in cases where humans abandon natural objects instead of engaging in ecophobic activities.

References

  • Danilov-Danil’yan, V. I. (1998). Is “Coevolution” of nature and society possible? Voprosy filosofii, 8, 15–25. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpinskaya, P. S., Liseyev, I. K., & Ogurtsov, A. P. (1995). Philosophy of nature: Coevolution strategy. Moscow: Interpraks. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Moiseyev, N. N. (1997). Coevolution of nature and society. The path to noospherogenesis. Ekologia i zhizn 2/3. Retrieved from http://www.ecolife.ru/jornal/echo/1997-2-1.shtml [in Russian].

  • Odum, E. (1983). Basic ecology (p. 518). Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodin, S. N. (1991). The idea of coevolution. Novosibirsk: Nauka. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ursul, A. D. (1998). Russia’s transition to sustainable development: The noosphere strategy. Moscow: Noosphera. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernadsky, V. I. (1988). Philoshophical thoughts of a naturalist. Moscow: Nauka. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernadsky, V. I. (1993). A few words on the noosphere. In Russian cosmism: An anthology of philosophical thought. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernadsky, V. I. (1997). Scientific thought as a planetary phenomenon. (B.A. Starostin Trans.). Moscow: Nongovernmental ecological V.I. Vernadsky Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yosef, R. (1996). Eilat, Israel: Avian crossroads of the old world. Living Bird, 15, 22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yosef, R. (2002). Pollution in a promised land—an environmental history of Israel. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Danilov-Danil’yan, V.I., Reyf, I.E. (2018). What About Coevolution?. In: The Biosphere and Civilization: In the Throes of a Global Crisis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67193-2_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics