Skip to main content

Scenario Analysis for Arctic Marine Resource Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Arctic Marine Resource Governance and Development

Part of the book series: Springer Polar Sciences ((SPPS))

Abstract

Future changes in Arctic marine ecosystems will depend as much on global climate change as on our ability to regulate and manage the exploitation pressure at sustainable levels. There is a lack of integrated, cross-sectoral ecosystem-based analysis of the Arctic marine management. The analysis would ideally include both the choices for implementing regulatory tools and how they will affect the many ecosystem-dependent values derived from them. The ability to maximize these values depends critically on the ways in which the dynamic bio-economic properties of the resources are impacted by the human behavior induced by the regulations (or lack thereof).

In this paper it is speculated about likely changes in the future Arctic fisheries based on a scenario building approach. The underlying changes to ecosystems are the climate changes which is also one of the drivers and the likely impacts in the Arctic. Other drivers can be identified but by selecting two main drivers it is possible to map four scenarios to be further analyzed. The drivers are the sectoral development of important marine sectors (fishing, shipping, mining etc.) and governance structure development. The development in each of these driving force’s dimensions is uncertain and central in the analysis are risk and uncertainty. The results indicate that the future climate changes might involve relatively large changes in the ecosystem and hence fish stocks, but also that the economic outcome of fisheries depends critically upon our ability to adjust the regulatory regime to capture the values of the ecosystem services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The current blue growth initiative by the EU has as a central policy recommendation to integrate and coordinate the marine and maritime policy of different sectors. The same policy approach is needed for the Arctic marine ecosystems. How this is done in practice is another question.

References

  • Alcamo, J., & Henrichs, T. (2008). Chapter two towards guidelines for environmental scenario analysis. Developments in Integrated Environmental Assessment, 2, 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anon. (2015). Declaration concerning the prevention of unregulated high seas fishing in the central Arctic Ocean, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, S., Lebow, R. N., Stein, J. G., & Weber, S. (2000). God gave physics the easy problems: Adapting social science to an unpredictable world. European Journal of International Relations, 6(1), 43–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S., Bennett, E., & Peterson, G. (2006). Scenarios for ecosystem services: an overview. Ecology and Society, 11(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, W. W., Lam, V. W., Sarmiento, J. L., Kearney, K., Watson, R. E. G., Zeller, D., & Pauly, D. (2010). Large-scale redistribution of maximum fisheries catch potential in the global ocean under climate change. Global Change Biology, 16(1), 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, J. S., Mecklenburg, C. W., & Karamushko, O. V. (2014). Arctic marine fishes and their fisheries in light of global change. Global Change Biology, 20(2), 352–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, C. W. (1990). Mathematical bioeconomics: The optimal management of renewable resources (2nd ed.). New York: J. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrichs, T., Zurek, M., Eickhout, B., Kok, K., Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Ribeiro, T., van Vuuren, D., & Volkery, A. (2010). Scenario development and analysis for forward-looking ecosystem assessments. In Ecosystems and human well-being: A manual for assessment practitioners (pp. 151–219). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollowed, A. B., Barange, M., Beamish, R. J., Brander, K., Cochrane, K., Drinkwater, K., Foreman, M. G. G., Hare, J. A., Holt, J., Ito, S.-i., Kim, S., King, J. R., Loeng, H., MacKenzie, B. R., Mueter, F. J., Okey, T. A., Peck, M. A., Radchenko, V. I., Rice, J. C., Schirripa, M. J., Yatsu, A., & Yamanaka, Y. (2013). Projected impacts of climate change on marine fish and fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 70(5), 1023–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsted, S. A. (2000). A review of the cod fisheries at Greenland, 1910–1995. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science, 28, 1–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, B. A., Fernandez, L. M., & Vestergaard, N. (2016). The future of the marine Arctic: Environmental and resource economic development issues. The Polar Journal, 6(1), 152–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, M. M., Dalpadado, P., Drinkwater, K. F., Godø, O. R., Hobday, A. J., Hollowed, A. B., Kristiansen, T., Subbey, S., Loeng, H., Murphy, E. J., Ressler, P. H., & Hofmann, E. E. (2014a). Krill, climate, and contrasting future scenarios for Arctic and Antarctic fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 71(7), 1934–1955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G. D., Cumming, G. S., & Carpenter, S. R. (2003). Scenario planning: A tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology, 17(2), 358–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swart, R. J., Raskin, P., & Robinson, J. (2004). The problem of the future: Sustainability science and scenario analysis. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden, K. (1996). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Notten, P. (2006). Scenario development: A typology of approaches. In Think Scenario, Rethink Education (pp. 69–84). Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van’t Klooster, S. A., & van Asselt, M. B. (2006). Practising the scenario-axes technique. Futures, 38(1), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatsov, M., (2017). The EU’s failed attempt to innovate with Regulation 1026/2012. Marine Policy 84, 300–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, P. A. (2012). Growth, degrowth and climate change: A scenario analysis. Ecological Economics, 84, 206–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilhjálmsson, H., Hoel, A. H., Agnarsson, S., Arnason, R, Carscadden, J. E., Eide, A., Fluharty, D., Hønneland, G., Hvingel, C., Jakobsson, J., Lilly, G., Nakken, O., Radchenko, V., Ramstad, S., Schrank, W., Vestergaard, N.,Wilderbuer, T. (2005). Fisheries and aquaculture. Arctic climate impact assessment (pp. 691–780).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassmann, P., Duarte, C. M., Agusti, S., & Sejr, M. K. (2011). Footprints of climate change in the Arctic marine ecosystem. Global Change Biology, 17(2), 1235–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, D., Booth, S., Pakhomov, E., Swartz, W., & Pauly, D. (2011). Arctic fisheries catches in Russia, USA, and Canada: Baselines for neglected ecosystems. Polar Biology, 34(7), 955–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niels Vestergaard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vestergaard, N. (2018). Scenario Analysis for Arctic Marine Resource Policy. In: Vestergaard, N., Kaiser, B., Fernandez, L., Nymand Larsen, J. (eds) Arctic Marine Resource Governance and Development. Springer Polar Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67365-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics